About Me

Name: CyberMom
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

A Bailout by any other name...

A new play for the ages... enjoy!! (I'd animate it - but I'm broke.. deal with it! HAHAHAHA)

[The Oval Office: Date ????]

[Obama is sitting in his chair, when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac walk in the door with 5 people in tow, each one wearing a shirt with a label: Ford, Toyota, Kia, Nissan]
Obama:
How good to see you guys, what's up?
Fannie: Well, we know we sort of messed up the whole, 'mortgage,' thing, but we've got a way to turn it all around!
[Fannie throws up a trifold stand and chart with an arrow pointing upward]
Freddie:
That's right! And, we've brought in our friends, representing the 'economy,' to show you how it works!
Kia: I thought we were here for a bailout...
Freddie: [elbowing Kia in the head] shutup!
Fannie: Um, yes, you see, well, we've decided that in order to stimulate the economy, is for people to take out car loans!
Kia: But aren't people broke? [Freddie kicks Kia] ouch...
Freddie: Heh, heh, that's right! By having people take out new car loans and give up their current cars, the banks will have loans out, earning interest and the economy will be turning around!
Kia: Yeah, right... like it did with your mortgage loans?... [Fannie spins and whacks Kia in the head with her purse, knocking him on the ground] OOF!
Obama: I see! That makes perfect sense! But, how are we going to get them to spend money on new cars?
Fannie: That's where the Ford bailout... erm, um, I mean, stimulus money comes in!
Freddie: That's right! We know people already have cars, but we want them to buy new ones.
Fannie: And, the stimulus money is supposed to create jobs, so....
Fannie & Freddie together: We'll have them buy hybrids!
Kia: Well, guess I'm out... [Ford slaps Kia] Ouch!
Obama: [stands up, raises his arm to the sky] That's brilliant! What'do we do?
Fannie: It's simple! Just have them bring in their old cars... their "clunkers," as I like to call them, and we'll let them "trade," it in for cash down on their new car!
Toyota: Um, I thought we already did that? [smacked on the head by Fannie]
Freddie:
Um, yeah, but you see, rather than have them 'trade,' in their cars and the retailer take a 'loss,' in their price...
Kia: Um, it's not a loss, that's why we overprice the cars in the first place... [Freddie swings chart around, whacks Kia upside the head, sets the now demolished chart back in place as it slowly spins around and arrow points down]
Fannie:
We will, instead, um, use the 'stimulus,' money, to reimburse the retailer!
Obama: Bottom line - how much?
Freddie: That's the beautiful part!
Fannie: Yes! It will only take about $6 billion!
Freddie: But, if people are REALLY taking advantage of it, Congress may have to issue out a little more, like $2 billion.
Fannie: And, if people are STILL excited about it, we'll need to issue a little more again, like another $2 Billion!
Obama: $2 billion? That's not a lot! I LIKE this plan!
Kia: [Counting on fingers to self] 6+2+2.. um, isn't that how much Ford asked for in its bailout request... [Freddie hip bumps Kia into the wall, breaking a table where a vase breaks over his head] Aaauurrggghhh!
Freddie: Great! We're SO glad you like it! You WON'T be disappointed sir, we promise!
Fannie: That's right! Unlike last time we promise these loans won't be overpriced!
Freddie: Of course, not! By reducing the prices by up to $4500 per car, people won't be in possession of cars that cost more than what they're worth!
Fannie: And, the best part is, we’ll call it a ‘trade-in,’ value!
Kia: Don’t we already call it a ‘trade-in….’ [stops and cringes when Freddie whips out a bat and threatens to hit him].
Obama:
But, what happens to the old cars?
Nissan: Let us sell them?
[Freddie jumps over to Nissan wrapping his arm around him and keeping his hand over his mouth, laughing nervously]
Freddie:
heh, heh, um, I mean, after all, we’re trying to support a ‘new’ economy, so we should.. um.. destroy them!
Fannie: Yes, you see, that way, if people can’t afford their mortgage..um, I mean, car loans, instead of being able to go back to the old cars, they’ll just have to learn to pay for the new ones this time instead of defaulting!
Freddie: Yes, you see, a win-win situation!
Fannie: And salvage yards can pick up the broken vehicles!
Kia: Why not give them to poor people who can’t afford cars, but now can use them to get jobs they couldn’t get before… [Fannie punches him in the gut, sending Kia doubling over] OOF
Obama: Excellent, so who's in!
[Ford steps forward]
Freddie:
Well, since GM/Chrysler's gone, and nobody else really has a valuable hybrid like Ford, we were sort of hoping you would support them above all others...?
Obama: C’mon now guys, I don't want this to be special interest - this IS about the people after all...
Fannie: [Smiles, leans over and puts her arms around Ford] His son went to college with you...
Obama: Really? Awesome! You're in! Wanna see a magic trick?
Ford: Um, okay, sure?
[Obama presses a button on his desk, 3 secret service agents walk in. He whispers in the ear of one, who relates orders privately to the other two who go stand on either side of Kia]
Obama:
Okay, you're gonna love this, I call it my: Amazing disappearing trick - Now you see him, Now you don't!
[Service agents throw a bag over Kia's head, knock him down and drag him out of the room kicking and mumbling]
[Everyone in room "oohs," and "aahs," as they look around, trying to see where Kia went]
Toyota:
It’s like he just, ‘disappeared…’
Nissan: Cool…..
Fannie: [turning her head left and right looking around] Wow... how - how'd you do that?
Obama: It's a national security thing! I'm working on the national debt right now! Just cover it up with so much money, nobody can see it anymore - but don't tell anyone - 'cause, magicians never tell their secrets!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the land of Oz, there lived a wizard...

   And, this grand, old and wisened wizard could only be found at the Emerald City. There, deep within the guarded walls of his crystal palace, those few, brave souls who came to call upon the wizard, were met with his terrible and fiery rage that had intimidated them into submission and agreement. In fact, stories tell of a girl from a star named Kansas who agreed to commit theft from another, simply because the wizard demanded it. He wanted her, to take away someone else's strength and power, so that he could make his own, and thus, the collective's power, even greater..... And, you know the rest of the story. Of course, the information spoken of within the central chamber where the wizard resided was safeguarded, and those who entered were told never to tell of the information they learned, for it was, "secret." Starting to sound more and more familiar? Makes you yearn for that simple, farm life, where you worked hard and gave up your search for wealth and accepted your lot in life. Not really a fairy tale ending either way you look at it.
 
Now, some of you... most of you... if any of you are out there.. lol... may take serious offense to what I'm about to write. In fact, I warn you now - don't judge till you reach the end - for I have another tale to weave that will offend. You see, there once was a young Senator named Barrack Obama, who was well off, well provided for and lacked for nothing. He knew he had the backing to overcome the odds, but also he knew, that the government was corrupted. He knew the politicians could be bought off, the police force acted with prejudice and without a sense of justice and that the law had so many holes in it, that truth leaked right out onto the floor every time you tried to use it. So, he decided one day to follow his dream. It wasn't to be a President, it was to make a change. He wanted to fix everything. But, he knew, as President, he was going to have limitations. For you see, in the land where young Obama resided, the President was to be a symbol for the people, but had become a patsy for Congressional and special interest. So, he began his career by appointing Czars - heads of departments, staffs and operations, who were above Congress. The only people they had to answer to was: Obama himself.
 
Should he make an office and leave it to Congress to run? How had Congress fared over the last Century or two? No, he had to change the rules - even his own rules - to supercede their authority. Obama knew that while the FBI will investigate a U.S. Soldier's background to the day of their birth, confirming where they lived and with whom they communicated in order to prevent anti-American sympathizers from gaining power (based solely upon their associations growing up), he would have to reposition himself and hide his past contacts the best he could. After all, if the FBI was that strict against top secret military personnel, wouldn't they be even stricter against him? So, Barrack fired the head Inspector General and hired a new one, who only answered to him. But, Barrack not only mistrusted Congress, he didn't trust the people. He knew they could be lead like sheep and be dangerous to his goals. So, he began drawing up bills for Congress to pass, that he would try to force through without having them read, so that the people didn't rebel.
 
Understand, Obama wanted change. He wanted to make things better. Rather than health care as it is now, he wanted the extreme opposite - because he had learned that "baby," steps, would get him nowhere. Rather than run out of money, he decided to authorize mass spending of money. And, there were problems in the land of Oz. When Jo the Plumber came to the Emerald City Gates, the gatekeeper wouldn't let him in. And, because Obama couldn't trust anyone, and was so afraid of trusting his own Government or turning to people for votes, that soon he was passing laws without the people - and without Congress. He was so afraid of his own Government, that he began he began passing votes without them and positioning people into power who would support his goals.
 
And, just maybe- Obama's not trying to destroy America. You see, this is a fairy tale ONLY because: We don't know what Obama's really thinking. But, then I stepped back and looked in again, and I saw exactly what I just wrote. Obama wants change - but Congress - good luck. Obama wants reform, but trying to get things passed by the people - heck - they voted for him, how could he trust ANY of them?! His only choice to save us is to do it his way, and that means over-riding the government and the people. The only problem, where Little Red Riding Hood's grandmother told her daughter what path to take through the forest, it seems that Obama's willing to follow one that has warning signs posted all over it.
 
Of course, I'm not saying this is what's "really," happening. I'm just playing Devil's Advocate here, and giving you a view into another, possible alternate to consider. Because, if we want change, what would you have Obama do, trust Congress to get it done? Would you have him rely on the legal system as it's designed now? Would you have him put it to vote? What course of action do you want him, to take? On the other hand, we mustn't forget what Mr. Bush Jr. told us: Once Obama was in the Whitehouse, regardless of whatever platforms he stood upon or principals he proclaimed, he would know what the President knew; the terrible secrets of "what's coming," that we, the people, don't know, and he would have to act upon it. And, what have we seen? We've watched Obama even go against his own party's desires with this health care bill now. What possible future could he have been shown - what truth could have been revealed to him, that he would do this? What fear of of his own government could give him cause to act as he is now? So - ask yourself - is it really a "totalitarian," attitude that he has, or is he really, "afraid?"
 
Oh well, enough of our fairy tale for today. Let's get back to reality now. What's on today's agenda - a four thousand page health care bill? Now THAT'S a fairy tale.....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dangerous Obama-isms

Evidence that the Democrats are lost.. really, really, really... um... REALLY lost, lies in the Obama-isms, that they support:
 
On this website, the individual used one of my most favoritest (bad grammar fully intended) quotes of Mr. Obama's:
 
We are not a people who fear the future. We are a people who make it.”
 
Really? Is that so? I know I've referenced this line before, but please, let me expand. First off, those who stand fully behind the President's Fourth of July speech, do so by also reminding us about all the people we should be thankful to, for our independence. Let me first ask - does anyone else here believe that thankfulness to those who have sacrificed on our behalf; appreciation to those who gave up, that we might move forward to a brighter future; requires a bit of humility? Does acknowledgment and appreciation, in its truest form, not require a sense of understanding that there are great forces at work - some terrible, some fantastic - but all great? Does understanding the sacrifice of our forefathers not bring to mind the realization they had of the future we were bound for? If not - then maybe this little ditty isn't for you. However, for those of you who can see the extreme fallacy in Obama's quote - please - read on!
 
We are not a people who fear the future? You mean, people who are too pompous, too arrogant, too self-centered and stubborn to recognize that our actions today could have potentially disastrous effects on future generations, right? Well, I buy that. In fact, I believe that's one of America's TOP problems. But, let's start with the man who authorized the stimulus bill, bankrupting our great, great grandkids. Sure - he doesn't fear the future - he makes it - just that he makes it COMPLETE garbage that he's not going to be around to see - so HE doesn't fear it. Obama acknowledges through his words and actions, that he is "acting," in a way that shows no humility or concern of consequences for our futures..
 
But, what about the humility? What about the fact he said this ON THE FOURTH OF JULY? Did our forefathers DIE and sacrifice themselves, their families, their existence and their happiness, because they felt our futures were okay? NO! They saw the writing on the wall! They saw the fallacy of a government that DOESN'T fear the future, that plans on bankrupting future generations, and felt CONFIDENT in its absolution of CONTROL over those future generations. They saw that the government didn't fear the people would ever retaliate, and didn't care about whether or not their futures would be good or bad. Guess what? Obama has not only shown his TRUE colors and abandoned the ENTIRE premise of humility - which he so often proclaims to possess in abundant quantities - but he did so on the Day of Celebration of Our Independence, in COMPLETE defiance of our forefathers and the freedoms they fought and died for, when he said we don't fear the future. Oh yes I do. I fear the future. I fear God. And, in that fearful state, I find humility, sacrifice, love and caring. What do you think people who don't fear consequences find.... hmmm?
 
But, there's another, even deeper aspect to consider. We don't just tread into the future with full confidence and assurety that there's nothing that can stand in our way (sort of Hitler/Stalin/Caesarish if you ask me), we MAKE the future! Well - that's profound. Of course we MAKE the future. Every action we take - or don't take - makes the future. But, on the obvious point of this (which is to say, Obama really is a terrible narrator and I don't understand how anyone EVER thought otherwise), I'll digress. Instead, I'll move to this upcoming "Health Care," package - that he doesn't want read in full. How do WE, do anything? How do WE, make the future? WE WON'T be voting on it! And, somehow, I don't see how creating a disaster for future generations is "making," their future. If anything, it's "unmaking," it (again, bad grammar, fully intended).
 
Listen carefully to Obama's speeches and you'll find little "caveats," just like this one. You'll find a speech of his from June 15, 2008, with the following:

"But if we are honest with ourselves, we'll admit that what too many fathers also are is missing – missing from too many lives and too many homes. They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men. And the foundations of our families are weaker because of it."
 
Now - maaaaayyybee it's just me - but I tend to be honest with myself about... 90% of the time (where I know for a fact that I try to intentionally be dishonest with myself 10% of the time when it comes to going bald, getting fat and getting old.. hee hee). The rest of the time, I don't have a problem with this - which Obama is SPECIFICALLY saying... we ALL do. However, I WILL agree that too many fathers are missing from family lives, and their children's homes. But, have they abandoned their responsibilities? And, what's this b.s. about them acting like little boys? Wait a second - he's talking about, "deadbeat dads." Ohh... I get it. Rather than SAY, he's talking about deadbeat dads - he generalizes in a way that would include EVERY father missing from their family's home. And, he goes on to say that when a father is missing from their family's home, that the family is weaker because of it. Taking ALL of that into account: Are military families "weaker," because dad is serving the country? What about Fathers who were ILLEGALLY forced out of their homes and away from their families by the inept Department of Human Services under the false color of law? Isn't then, the Government, through Constitutional, Federal and State violations of law, weakening the fabric of American families? He wants deadbeat dads held accountable, but who holds Uncle Sam accountable?
 
You see... every speech of his - every one - has some little catch in it. There's some little hint at Obama's true position. There's always a little "warning," sign - always. Sometimes, there are HUGE ones. And, those who post web sites specifically quoting these lines to show: What a great President Obama really is, are pointing out to America, the ignorant and dysfunctional mentality that encouraged them to vote for him in the first place. It shows how today's President doesn't need basic, public communications skills, only a brain dead audience that cheers at anything. Let's start at the beginning - let's force Mr. Obama into a "non," specialized, set-up media interview where he will have to answer for these questions. Let's have it run as a potential interview for impeachment and see just how he'll answer then. Of course.. while it seems this will never happen -
 
Let's at least get this recorded down in the history books somewhere, so future generations can mark where we went wrong, and have "indicators," of what not to do and who not to vote for!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When the wealthy are taxed, so are the poor

   I hear a lot of criticism of Obama's stimulus packages, health care packages, bills and the entire left's attempts at "governing," the country. A lot of this criticism frequently refers to the wealthy having to be the ones to pay for all the spending going on in Washington. I've even heard it said that it will "be" the wealthy paying for all this spending simply because the poor don't have it. But, I'd like to expand upon the topic for an issue that I feel should be noted by everyone:
 
When the wealthy pay - so do the poor. The wealthy don't get their money because they live in some different dimension than everyone else. The wealthy get their money by owning businesses, property, stocks and other such investments. When money sits in a trust account, the lending institution earns "interest," on that money by investing it (as a loan) in fields like construction. When developers take out that loan, they know how much they expect to make from the sale of the property, how much they want to spend, and from there, hire contractors who hire sub-contractors and so on. The bottom line, at the bottom end of that list of individuals hired to do the work, are the minimum wage folks. When the wealthy purchase property and "rent," or "lease," it out, it's usually those who can't afford to buy property, (aka, the "not" wealthy), that take up contracts with the wealthy, paying out a certain amount of money each month to rent or lease that business or home. When stocks go up and down, businesses survive/don't survive, we mustn't forget that in the production warehouses for GE (for example), that real people work there, making a minimum wage. While John Doe may have the millions to purchase ten thousand shares of GE, Joe Smith, working in the production factory, only makes enough to support his family. Of course - there are countless levels of income in between - but for the sake of this article, I'm focusing on the two extremes of "rich/poor."
 
What happens when John Doe, our millionaire, has to pay more in property taxes? Joe Smith, the guy making $28,000 per year BEFORE taxes, will see his rent go up. It's not because John Doe's being "mean," or "greedy," but if John Doe has to pay more, he has to be able to make up the difference. When the banks tighten their purse and John Doe's trust account is no longer earning what it did, Joe Smith is offered $10 per hour less than he was before. So, when the wealthy get taxed, so do the poor, and the middle class, and everyone in between. It's a cascading effect that rolls downhill, and if "upper" management/corporate executives don't give up their salaries, guess who's giving up their jobs? That's right - our Joe Smith. And, this problem continues to perpetuate itself. Unfortunately, it gets far worse than this. Because, the same thing happens in reverse. Now that Joe Smith is making $10 per hour less in wages, is paying hire rent and can barely afford to survive as it is, along comes socialized health care, stimulus taxes and other insane laws passed by the all-loving and all-caring Obama administration, and Joe Smith is now paying 3 - 4% more in taxes. May not sound like a lot to some people, but if Joe Smith makes $25k (now that he's lost $10 per hour), he's just added on $875 to his current $3000 tax rate (12% in Oregon avg). Is $21,125 enough for Joe Smith to survive on with a wife and a child, paying $1,200 in rent (the $200 increase being a trickle down effect of John Doe having to raise rent), an additional $200 in food (because the various businesses have now been hurt from these laws and have to make up the difference), and on and on?
 
It's impossible. Joe Smith nets about $1768 per month at the above tax rate. After rent and the increase in food, gas and other expenses, Joe is going in the hole around $500 per month, easy. Now, either John Doe has to lose his renter, or lower his rates. If he can afford to lower his rates (which, in the new Obama economy, he can't), he and Joe might be able to keep going. However, Joe has to move out with his family and find rent that is at least $500 cheaper, and start cutting back on his spending and other activities. With so many homes coming available for rent, the developers slow down, and the banks are no longer providing John Doe as much in Trust earnings any longer. With Joe's spending down, John's stock portfolio isn't looking so good, and he has to start thinning out what he has to be prepared for the worse. Suddenly, the trickle down effect has become the trickle up effect, and no matter how you look at it, everyone, in every tax bracket, will be taxed two or three times for the same thing, just in different ways.
 
Now, I don't doubt that all of you know this. I have no doubts that you're all already thinking about how all of this plays out. But, I just felt it important to add this in, in a time when the news media has lost focus of the outrageous spending just to manage the outrageous health care and supreme court decisions. If we keep everything in perspective and don't lose sight of reality, we will have a better chance at coming through this whole mess!! :) Cheers!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Empire revisited - freedom lost

Quite some time back I discussed America as an up and coming Empire - An Empire being:
 
1. The region over which Imperial Dominion is exercised,
2. A group of countries under a single authority (which, Great Britain, and America, both qualify as),
3. A monarchy with an Emperor as the head of state,
4. conglomerate, a group of diverse companies under common ownership and run as a singular entity
 
An Imperial Dominion - a supreme ruler over all nations. Look at what America is - is it a Republic? Well, a Republic is a conglomerate, but the people have influence over the government through some form of Democracy or similar political structure. I'm not really sure that America completely qualifies as a republic any longer, given the limitations on freedom, passing of laws without representation and misrepresentation in the passing of certain laws which place dominion and control on the people. Of course, as we are on the path to a Marxist Socialist way of life, the definition of an Empire becomes more clear for America. Actions in our economy such as "the New Deal," by Roosevelt, most certainly took us away from being a Republic and began instituting solid foundations in Imperial Dominion.
 
As I discussed in my last article, "The New Deal '2'," the investment of the government into overpricing is most certainly tearing our economy apart as it's replaying the events that helped lead up to the great depression. A loaf of bread that was $2 is now $100, and box cars that were $75,000, are now $2,000,000; and the government won't back those items at those inflated prices, or else the currency, it's "I.O.U.'s," would devalue the gold that backs it. If you read about what happened with Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac, GSE's that bought overpriced Mortgages/home loans (that the people couldn't repay, driving home prices through the roof), and how AIG created insurance policies to back these overinflated mortgages, you begin to see more and more of how the government, with a power/rule that far exceeds a standard "Republic," committed an act which helped contribute to the dramatic economic difficulty we're in now. The problem is, AIG is holding onto insurance policies that the government won't back. Amtrak's holding onto boxcars that the government won't back. But, because of their being in bed together, because of GSE's and special interest and Wall Street, the government creates bail outs and stimulus packages that do what? Bail out the government - NOT the people. Is that a Republic? Is that representing the interests of the people? Does that even INVOLVE the people, or were the people just pawns in this big, game? It's GSE's... bailing out GSE's, and in the process, gaining MORE control of those companies, such as AIG (as they already had Amtrak), and suddenly, the definition of an Empire as a conglomerate, run as a single business, begins to be made even MORE clear.
 
Roosevelt's "New Deal," and all of the sham government controls over things like "social security, housing and civil works," would crash if the government crashes. They are inflated as it is now, and as economists have warned, will become hyperinflated. The government won't back them. That's why, when you heard that AIG had to be saved to protect companies and GM had to be saved to protect jobs - it did NOTHING. the same jobs were all still lost. The same bonuses were all still given. The bailouts and the stimulus have nothing to do with protecting the people - only the GSE's - the government - and its special interests. If jobs are saved along the way, then great - but that's only a "secondary," to the main goal of government covering their own actions. See, if AIG failed, the banks would need to collect on the debts. Who do they go to? The same GSE's that purchased the overinflated mortgages in the first place ... Uncle Same (through Freddie Mae and Mac). But, Uncle Sam can't back the bank's demands without devaluing the gold. If the dollar's worth 10 pieces of gold instead of 1 - think about what that would mean to the rest of the world and their wanting to collect... we'd be in a world of hurt.
 
This has been seen in history where an Empire overspends. Julius Caesar was spending left and right, building his armies, catering to the poor (through entertainment, not actually "solving," their problems...) to make them "believe" he was cool, then turning on them. His power was becoming absolute and he was ruining the country. He had to be stopped. Hitler originally invested in a lot of programs that supported a lot of jobs, until he began internalizing his power to become an Emperor. He began spending on government only projects - increasing his military's strength, specialized weapons projects, funding internal government sources to be his personal regime to maintain absolute authority, and this got him in trouble with his fellow leaders and the people. Jobs declined, but the government got wealthier. He had to be stopped. The British Empire had stretched its arms out to the world and spent a lot of money to do it. In fact, in all its spending, it sold itself short. It soon began to lose hold of its colonies. In America, where the King of England was lavishing his own with monies, it created dissention and chaos, even with their neighbors, France. The point is - everywhere overspending has been an issue, the value of the economy and currency declined, nothing good came of it. This includes the Great Depression and America. The government helped march us there, and rather than march back out, they somehow convinced us to let them keep going.
 
Are we a Democracy? That's a question you have to answer for yourself. Are we free? I certainly hope you don't think that getting to print a few words on the internet is freedom- because I can assure you - even though another is typing these words for me, both they and I do so in fear of retribution from our government. Have you control in voting on how YOUR tax dollars are spent? A republic would. Do you have control in what laws are passed? A republic would. Do you have control of who's in the primaries for you to vote on in an election, or who gets to be president without the electoral college's special interference OR who the next supreme court justice would be? A democracy... would. This isn't even a representative democracy. People were angry about the AIG spending, but would the government take the hit for what they did and represent the people? Nope. They said, "Bad AIG, no more really, really big, personal bonuses for you - only little ones." Is that... representing what you wanted?
 
Your stimulus monies have gone mostly to law enforcement for the streets and justice for the courts and special interest for the government, while the jails and schools suffer. Is that what you voted on? I mean, after all, you know that when there's no money left, you'll have to join in on the rioting to get bread to feed your family, so it's good there's more law enforcement to stop you, right? Hmm....
 
Are you even getting a say so in the legalization of marijuana? HAHAHAHAHA - I don't care to comment on what I think about it - but we're talking about a very OLD and very SENSITIVE issue - and you get NO voice. Especially, if you're NOT for it, and it gets passed - did your 'elected official,' do what you elected them to do (or vice versa)?
 
A republic, this is not. Not anymore.
 
A capitalist country, this is not, not under the conglomeration of private business to government say so and control.
 
A democracy, this is not. Not with the voice of the people fading into the wind.
 
So, what are you left with? Do the math people. Not too many choices out there. There's socialism, and marxist socialism. There's communism, monarchy's and dictatorships. There's aristocracies (which America has been for a long time now) and fascism (which also defines America's political structure perfectly).
 
Sure - there are a few other choices. But, once you've passed by a republic and a democracy, and capitalism has declined - so has freedom. So, whatever your equation ends up with - freedom is not going to be a part of it anymore.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Deal "2" - Death of an economy

Okay, if you want more background on this, please read my last post: Economic Forecast Follow-up. Be forewarned, what I'm about to give you is not a "prediction," an "estimation," a "best-guess," or a "conspiracy." I can promise you, it is not paranoia or any personal agenda that prompts me to write this. The foundation of what I'm about to present to you is the title of this entire blog: When Governments Lie - the people suffer. And, it's true. When our elected officials no longer represent us, act on our behalf or care whether or not their actions are hurting the people, then the control spire which was there to make sure that our "Government," in the land of the free and home of the brave, is no longer functioning. The government is no longer of the people, by the people ....
 
or for the people.
 
The Democratic Party - the party in control of the White House, in control of the Presidency and in control of the Economy, under the leadership of President Obama, is taking a dangerous position that is counter-productive to our economy and our stability. I usually hate taking sides folks, but this time around, the actions from the Government and the media being lead by them cannot be attributed to any other source. I'm not saying the Republicans are the only right ones - because our party has not done its job in cleaning house when this is the PERFECT time to do so (because we don't have influence in Washington, we might as well spend this time getting our party straight). But, the Left is in control, and it is under the direct leadership of the Left, no bleed-through from any previous administration, which is misleading the people. How so?
 
Obama has been encouraging investments in the Stock Market, and under this article, perhaps you will take as much delight as I did in the first sentence: "It's official. Obama thinks you're an idiot." I'll let you read that article to fully understand all the little quirks of Obama's "invest in the stock market to prove to America we're doing okay" plan. But, I'd like to draw your attention to another point of the stock market known as GSE's (government sponsored enterprises). These are not new, and have been around since the early 1900's. However,  GSE's started out as a different purpose than what they are today. You should note the following: The government possesses warrants with 79.9% ownership in these companies that would allow them to walk in and take full control at any time. With more recent companies like Freddie Mac and the banking/mortgage institutions, the government has several TRILLION $$'s in assets on record. What are those assets? Our HOMES.  The GSE's include ownership of companies - and stocks in the capital market - including WALL STREET (ie. their ownership of ... oil stocks.... :).. cool, huh?). This was "supposedly" to help raise long-term funds. But, let me simplify this:
 
If you invest in Wall Street - and help raise that number - there's a good chance that you're going to be investing in the government (ie. AMTRACK - who -- don't forget - was given $18 million in stimulus funds, in Delaware, for NINE box cars to be renovated, and yet, it is OWNED and controlled by the government, NOT free enterprise...). Of course, if the government wants to encourage your spending, they can simply do something as simple as... oh wait... give stimulus monies to the GSE's that are reflected in the stocks and it makes the stock market go up! So.. wait a second... let's pull all this together...
 
Could it possibly be, that the "increases," in the stock market (which some of you may have been watching what I have), seem to occur in sync with the issue of stimulus monies (and/or spending of it)? Could it possibly be that consumer confidence in Wall street IS down, and Obama, is just trying to do what he said he would BEFORE the election, and back in February? That is, to convince the American People to invest more money into the stock market? So - what does this mean? Would the government really do this? Would they issue out "stimulus" monies that mostly protect only the government and its investments and create a "false" sense of security in the stock market to encourage you to invest knowing that you're really just helping fund the government more?
 
The answer you're looking for is YES. This is EXACTLY what they're doing. If the stock market fails, multitudes of the government fail - because they get some of their monies through the stock market. AIG and others failing - was NOT about the American people, it was about the GOVERNMENT. See, no one's been telling you this. They've all said (even me), let them fail - if they're private enterprise, then let capitalism work. And, while that's true, the government's been operating quietly in the background not telling you that it's their own backsides they're trying to cover!! This is a complex issue folks, and I wish I had the space to detail this ALL for you (if I had a radio talk show - I could do it - but I know that reading LONG blogs is difficult).
 
The point is this - they're lying about the stock market and the economy. They want people to invest, or else it's the government that could collapse, and all the bogus, money-scams they've been running with it! The lie will cause you to give up your hard earned money into stocks that they own 79.9% of - and can reclaim in FULL, during times of an "economic crisis," (hmm....), and you will lose everything. This is NOT the great depression we're heading towards. Oh no, that wouldn't be as bad as what we're heading toward. Back then, when stocks dropped, it took wheelbarrows full of money to buy a loaf of bread. But, you won't have wheelbarrows full, or loaves to buy, because the government's going to reclaim its ownership of your stocks, and your money, and it will shut down the borrowing capacity to farmers and agriculture who were growing the wheat that can no longer afford to do so. THAT is the real danger. THAT is the big collapse we are heading toward. I'm not an "economist," and I don't know all the "ins and outs," of financial trade. But, I do know this:
 
U.S. currency - whether paper or coin, is an I.O.U. It is an object whose value is based solely upon the ability of the signer of that I.O.U. to reimburse you for it. I buy bread from you - I don't give you anything of value, because I have nothing. I give you an I.O.U., and the point and purpose of the Federal Reserve System, the F.D.I.C. and others, who are ALL government run - NOT privately (I say this, because you might remember that Obama just broke the law and fired the inspector general - one of the "peoples'", controls over the government... so yes, be afraid, be very afraid), is so that you can take your I.O.U. note to the bank and get reimbursed. During the great depression, why then did it take a wheelbarrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread, did the gold that backs those I.O.U.'s disappear or its international value drop to zero? No -
 
People lost jobs, couldn't spend, and their BORROWING capacity was reduced to nil and repossessions occurred galore! The stock market crashed because banks were forcing collection on debt (remember, they're the ones backed by the gold - but for some reason, this didn't seem to matter?? oh yeah - PBS that aired that - sort of left that out... guess who owns PBS... yep - Uncle Sam). If you read Ohio's take on the cause, it's because stocks were sold for more than what they were worth (hmm.. didn't Uncle Sam's I.O.U. notes help dictate all of that?). What's the ultimate conclusion of all this: that when the government was causing the U.S. Dollar to no longer have the value it did (and yes - regardless of what you'll read in some places, the banks set that dollar standard, and they were taken over LONG ago by the government, and Uncle Sam is the one who pulled his backing of the currency), and people realized that selling an item for $1 no longer meant $1, but $0.20 cents. Now bread was worth a wheelbarrow full of money. The gold's still there, but the value of the dollar dropped because those governing it wouldn't back it up at the same level anymore. And Hoover, the President in charge in 1929, said: We don't believe in helping the individual people. Sorta' sounds like... the whole thing was the fault of a selfish/capitalist government.. but maybe I'm just guessing here...
 
The lie - and how it hurts us? Back to my blog on the $18 million that saved 9 box cars for renovation... think about this... a new box car is worth: $75,000 max, and that's with a lot of the amenities. Just like buying a loaf of bread for $100 in 1929, we're buying a $75,000 box car with $2 million dollars. See the correlation? Understand how the lie is beginning to undermine this economy? No - it's not greed that will be spawned (oohh.. my box car's worth $2 mil), because the government OWNS Amtrak. It's a failure for the stock market, because the stocks the government owns are getting undermined, and the issuance of tens of trillions of dollars that are bottoming out our economy. Who cares if it's going to take 50 years just to pay back what the government spends in 2009 alone? That's ASSUMING the dollar's value goes back up! We need to be concerned about abuses with the stimulus money, falsely reporting to people that they should be investing in the stock market, "or companies will fail," and begin understanding that the lie will cause our stock investments to bottom out and crash our economy - again! Buying stocks in Amtrak... well... you just bought $18 million dollars in box cars, that MAY be worth.. AT BEST... $900,000. Remember the 1929 crash? Stocks being sold for more than what they were worth? The government saying - hey - we're not gonna' back your stock, we can't get more than $900,000 for those box cars in international trade and we MOST CERTAINLY, can't devalue our gold! The banks saying, um - you need to give us money now, because Uncle Sam's pulling his value out of the dollar?
 
If you can see the writing on the wall.. or even if you can't.. you need to read the Top 10 New Deal arrangements made by Franklin Roosevelt. What you're going to see is that we did NOT fix the problem. We didn't even band-aid it. The government reclaimed control of those GSE's I mentioned in the last article - and the results are what you see today. What was broken, got worse. In 1929, they LET the people and the businesses fail because there was NO way to bail them out. What the New Deal REALLY did - was to make sure that Uncle Sam doesn't take as much of a hit if it happens again (yes, I know, there were a couple of good things in it, too - but not enough).
 
The next, "New Deal," is upon us - and it will HAVE to be even MORE restrictive than last time and require an even GREATER failure for the people than last time. Are you ready? I'm not...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Economic Forecast Follow-up

Folks, a short while ago I posted a blog on: How not to read an economic forecast. Without having "all" the details or being an "insider," but being someone who follows the NEWS and pays close attention to what the media and government is feeding us, I boldly stated that the economic forecasters were either lying to us, or were just downright wrong in telling us retail was up because there were higher, 1st quarter earnings. For those who read it, you may remember that I stated that companies like Toyota, would definately report higher, 1st quarter earnings without GM dealerships to compete with, and stores like Walmart would report higher 1st quarter earnings with the littler, mom and pop stores having been driven out of business.
 
The brief report at Newsalert stated that on June 4th, Walmart was no longer going to report its monthly earnings because it "knew" that it was causing the economic forecasters to have an incorrect view of consumer spending behavior (and good for Walmart - maybe letting China own it was the best thing that could happen for that store!). What happened? The economic forecasters showed a dramatically sharp "drop" in retail spending from consumers (I believe the number was 24%+/-) from their previous forecast, when Walmart's individual stores were included. TWENTY FOUR percent is a HUGE number. Walmart accounts for nearly 15% of the U.S. retail economy with over 4000 stores! But, let's also consider that Best Buy has over 1,000 stores, and Home Depot has nearly 2,000 stores! The list goes on - and please check these numbers for yourself as I don't have an "economic" analyst to confirm them for me, but I know they're pretty close. What does that mean? It means - I was right. What I was telling you about the economic forecasters painting a false picture was dead on the money. People, please understand, I'm NOT boasting! In fact, it would be better if I WAS wrong. I would be much happier, because that would mean things WERE getting better - but they're NOT!
 
It was reported that Oregon's $175 million dollars in stimulus monies saved approximately 3,000 jobs. Set aside more recent reports that the so-called, "saved jobs," reports from the stimulus fundings are grotesquely over-exaggerated, because those 3,000 jobs equate to salaries of more than $58,300 PER PERSON!! The average income in Oregon in 2007 was $38,000+/-. It has NOT changed much in two years (especially with layoffs and a bad economy). Currently, the unemployment rate state-wide is 12.5%, or about 250,000 people!! What does all that mean? It means that the average person in Oregon, you know, the common workers, the little people like me (and maybe even you), are not seeing their jobs saved. The people who make this economy run - working in retail, fast food, gas, factories, production lines, and the "pleasures" of life that the wealthy community's money is supposed to give them access to - are not being helped by the stimulus package. What it also means, is that in order to save everyone's jobs, it would take $14 BILLION dollars. Unfortunately, the jobs that were "saved" were all government funded - ie. direct employment through the government or contracted labor to privately owned companies. So, the stimulus package, in the end, even if we received that $14 billion dollars, couldn't actually save everyone (oh yeah - this was the most RECENT stimulus package - you don't wanna know what we did with the rest.. hee heee hee).
 
Folks, I was right on with my concerns about economic forecasters by a government bought media (for those of you who read the TownHall magazine and know about the government's control over the media that I've been crying out loud about for a LONG time), and you can trust me when I tell you that this broadcasting of the "jobs" being saved by the stimulus money is B.S.!! And, like it or not, I can point the finger directly at the left - because they're in charge right now - so they get to bear this shame, not any "past" administration. Under President Obama, the media is providing FALSE numbers that are meant to stimulate "hope," and try desperately to save the stock market by encouraging MORE spending. The Democrats are committing one of the MOST DANGEROUS acts in this country's history - and I'll tell you how in the next post; but in the meantime, now you know just how bogus ALL of this "economic" forecasting and these numbers really are. You've been given sufficient knowledge know with which to head out into the world.
 
What will you do next?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sonia Sotomayor - the race card

This is a mixed issue for me as I believe there are important issues surrounding the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice, but only the most pointless of debates - as it was with Clarence Thomas - are underway (so far) - and while I have no doubts that she will be elected to the Supreme Court (nobody says no to Mr. President!), there are a few issues that I feel are worthy of addressing. The first issues are not conspiracy theory or some 'corruption' of justice, but issues brought forth by her supporters that need to be re-evaluated:

Mrs. Sotomayor's dealings with diabetes - DO NOT matter to her being on the Supreme Court. That is a human-sensitive issue meant to gain sympathy in her favor and is inappropriate in the Judicial system when evaluating a person based on qualifications - not who feels sorry for her. This is not Mrs. Sotomayor's fault, but the fault of the President, and others, who have felt it was a point of consideration for appointing her.

Mrs. Sotomayor's "Hispanic" origin as a point of consideration for appointing her is both disgusting to me as a fellow brother under the Lord, and appalling as an advocate of equal rights for all people WITHOUT discrimination. But, I suppose that Obama played the African American card like it was an Ace, why not have racial issues in the selection of a supreme court justice, too? And yes people - it is a racial point based on the same 'human-sensitive' platform that I discussed previously.

Mrs. Sotomayor's saving of baseball is another, blatant abuse by her supporters (the President amongst them, who felt that was an important addition to his introduction speech about her - when he couldn't even REMOTELY pronounce her name right - George bush anyone - calling her Sadamiyer (sounds like sodomizer without the z??) - which truthfully degraded every other good thing he had to say by bringing 'baseball,' in as a key point of electing judicial officials to the Supreme Court?) - this point should not even be brought up. She did NOT "save" baseball. She is not a "hero," and saving baseball is not a hard hitting issue that really equates to something such as... the death penalty. And, if you don't get that - and aren't on death row - you don't get to comment.

Mrs. Sotomayor's subtle attempts at dismissing appeals court experience was an example of her lack of experience in a formal, public setting. The truth is - the Constitution does not stand. Contentions to the Constitution do NOT come from those trying to break the law - they come from PROSECUTORS, pushing past the boundaries set by the Constitution to incriminate anyone they can for money, and it is the responsibility of appeals court justices to rule when brought to their attention. It's vital - VITAL to note - that the justice system does NOT rest upon the standards of the Constitution, but upon caselaw and precedence. I was actually glad to see a judge with this type of experience, available to replace the same judge on the Supreme Court (and from the news said - I have no verification on this- the ONLY one) with that type of experience. For Mrs. Sotomayor to dismiss it and try to ease into it with, "I know..." was not wholly appropriate. Yes, we "know," you "know," the truth is that the Constitution is being negated - but that's not what you were being asked!! ARGH!

Enter: America's Worst Media Reporters.

Robert Lovato: "Sotomayor should remember it's not she who is on trial, but the Republican party." He goes on to say that it will be a test of the Republican party to see if they're ready to renew the fundamental principals of justice. WHAT?? What principals? The ones whereby Sotomayor has experience as an appeals judge and the Constitution does not need to stand as law? I'm pretty sure, that's NOT a fundamental principal of justice. Maybe he's talking about pre-constitution times when English Jurisprudence still ruled the land and we had things like the Salem Witch Trials? Of course.. that's what's going on in the justice system today for those who have had the whereforall to watch the news....

Well, thank goodness the Democrats who are in control of Congress have something reasonable to say, like Senator Patrick Leahy, who tells us that it's good that Sotomayor is Hispanic because that will better reflect "equal justice under law." WHAT?? So - are you saying that Sotomayor being Hispanic means she will better handle the Hispanic community? Does that mean that the Supreme Court is expecting a lot of Hispanic people to now be brought before them (and is therefore a racist comment)? Does that mean the other judges, white, oriental and black are racist? Wouldn't that mean that Sotomayor as a Hispanic would be biased against a white? See how this is a STUPID issue that does NOT belong here. And, yet - it IS the consideration of many in Congress, for Sotomayor's appointment. Sorry to say, but even if she is qualified, she now has to be discounted or else we continue to push the issue of segregation in America further.

Perhaps Jennifer Donahue has offered valuable insight by stating that Justice Thomas' statement that he was a victim of a 'high-tech lynching' was the end of a miscarriage of justice against poor, Clarence Thomas? Perhaps, Ms. Donahue's very first coverage of a Supreme Court appointment was about as worthless to her career as 'valuable insight,' as her current article on the Sotomayor debate is to ... um.. reality? Justice Thomas' statement was a racist slam in his favor. There was no, "high tech," involved, he was playing the race card, in hopes of saving face, to "lynch," the Supreme Court and the GOP into a forced appointment lest they now become biggots. She believes the Republicans are only putting up a fight to, "keep the base happy," and maybe she's right. But, then again, maybe Clarence Thomas wasn't playing the race card and was really being threatened with a good, ol' fashion, southern-style lynchin'!! And, maybe - America can quit acting like stupid sheeple and recognize stupidity for what it is - stupidity.

The point is this: while it's been stated that Sotomayor has more experience in her pre-Supreme Court Justice status than any of the others had who currently serve when they were in the same position, less is being said about her qualifications and more about playing a race card, a human-sensitive/sympathy card and a pressure card against Republicans. Why? It would be a waste of space to repost the many concerns here, so I'll reference them for your reading:

The Case Against Sotomayor

Sotomayor's Judicial Record Could be a Battlefield for Critics: "Judge Sotomayor will need to reassure the country that she will set aside her biases, uphold the rule of law and interpret the Constitution as written, not as she believes it should have been written.." (didn't Senator Leahy state that he supported her equal justice stance???? doesn't that seem like he has NO CLUE what he's doing either??)

Sotomayor and Race

Why these issues? Why not just flat out attack Sotomayor, or support Sotomayor for her judicial qualifications? Because, these are the cards that a race-card President and race-card, Democrat President played, and they know it worked. The people voted for it, gave it support like ignorant sheep, and now they're seeing the fruits of their ignorance. Why race? Because I HATE race topics. Race topics SEGREGATE this country, and our people, and are NOT AMERICAN. What to do now? Again, I'll re-emphasize, that I have no doubt that the non-Constitutional issues - NON CONSTITUTIONAL - standards - upon which Sotomayor is being judged, will pressure the Senate into supporting her. I have no doubt that YOUR elected officials (not mine - I DIDN'T vote for them), will fail you, as representatives of YOUR best interest. However, there will be consequences from this decision as well - and we won't get to see the full ramifications of those consequences, I'm afraid, until it's too late. Remember - the Supreme Court is a LIFE position - who we put on now - will be there FOR LIFE - not 2 years, not 4 years - but more like - THIRTY OR FOURTY! We can't make half-cooked decisions from half-summed up information. The vote for a Supreme Court Justice official is a vote of grave importance. What I feel should have been addressed:

  • Her support for or against the Constitution (especially as an appeals court judge).
  • Her support for or against (or knowledge or lack of knowledge of) the 30% of prison population being INNOCENT and not being afforded their rights.
  • Her support for or against (or knowledge or lack of knowledge of) the failure for effective, indigent defense, the failure to hold prosecutors accountable or responsible, the corruption running rampant in law enforcement.

These would have been worthy issues upon which Sotomayor could have stood. Now, it's too late. Now, we're going to see this happen, and we - the people - the ones who make up this country and will be affected by EACH AND EVERY decision this woman makes (including decisions supported by pressure from special interest groups such as the Latino group), will realize, too late, what segregation will do to our Country.

A house divided CAN NOT STAND.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's all about the control...

More hypocrisy and communistic totalitarianism from the Pacific Northwest...

Oregon state to join in the ban on the sale of novelty lighters.
 
Why? According to the city of sandy's fire marshall, "kid's brains aren't equipped to understand their curiosity with fire and the inherent danger in playing with lighters or matches." (Paraphrased in part). In other words- because kids can start fires with them (don't worry- the government's not including matches, gasoline or regular lighters because obviously THOSE can't be used to start fires, too... Right? Wait a second...)

In reply to this, others have argued that it is the responsibility of parents, not the government, to control what their kids' do. However, the fire marshall explained that the item that kills more kids per year than guns should not be made to look like a toy (irregardless of the toy grenades and semi-automatic police gear that looks real...). The fire marshall went on to explain that the ban will be intended to protect children whose parents are irresponsible...

Sounds fair in the bigger scheme of things, I suppose. Protect children from parents who don't bother to teach them about fire safety and just let them wildly run around starting fires.

But, why novelty lighters? If the kids' aren't taught the difference between right and wrong, it doesn't matter if it's a matchbook, a regular lighter or a lighter that looks like a car- they're going to play with it. But, did the novelty lighter makers design them with the intent to harm children? Obviously - no. Just some person with an entrepeneural spirit figured out a way to sell a .99 cent lighter for $4 bucks- and good for them!

When- not if - this law passes, the entrepeneurs will pay the price. The stores that already show the responsibility to only sell lighters to adults-will pay the price. Adults who purchase novelty lighters or collect them (as the fire marshall admitted to doing herself), will pay the price. But, that's not even the bad part.

You see, the parents who are responsible and teach their kids that because something looks fun, doesn't mean it is, will pay the price. Why? Water looks fun, doesn't it? Are we going to ban lakes and rivers? Several people, every year, die in the local lakes and rivers, ignoring the laws and not being skilled enough to swim!

What about driving? Cars look cool, don't they? but, do parents 'let' their children drive their cars before they are trained? For the most part, 99% don't. But, where do we draw the line between curiosity and accident? Where do we draw the line between neglect and sneakiness? Worse- when mom and dad are no longer the authority figures, how do children's fragile minds distinguish between following what their parents say and just doing whatever they want, believing the government has removed all of the obstacles?

Do we want our children hurt, I say, no! But a lego is a toy, and I have to teach my child not to swallow it. The plug outlet on the wall 'looks' like a toy to the mind of a child and I have to teach them not to touch it.

Is it a problem that the government can tell us, as adults, what WE get to enjoy and not enjoy? I'm sorry- no more drinking glasses with cute sayings because you're too irresponsible to teach your kids it's meaning!! Where does it end (because, now we know where it begins)? Did making toy guns look less real stop kids from liking them or using real guns? Maybe statistics say 'yes,' but I'm not a big believer in so-called 'statistics'.

When do we, as parents, stop worrying about our children's well being because uncle sam has us covered? Do we, as parents, have a right to raise our children the way we see fit (within obvious, appropriate boundaries)? Our we Constitutionally protected to be secure in our homes and families?

When do we have a right to tell the government, 'no,'? You see, this is the problem with our government- no representation. Either congress does as they please, or minority groups with the monetary backing fight to make themselves look important, not caring about the consequences of their actions.

But, hey, half the people on Obama's staff aren't being held accountable for breaking the law, so why should anyone in congress have to be? Our tax monies are going wherever the gvt. Chooses without our say-so, so why should they represent us anywhere else?

There it is, folks. The exemplification of Democracy's failure in America. The breakdown of moral standards and ethics. I wonder when the first court hearing will take place for the person who shows the gall to buy a novelty lighter... Or maybe decorates their own? I wonder when the laws will be expanded by the next minority group to ban bar-b-ques because they present a danger?

Remember, it's NOT about protecting our kids. We, as parents, work hard to protect our kids everyday, including protection from corrupted gvt officials and law enforcement. It's about the systematic decline of your individual rights, the long-term harm to your families and the effects on your children.

For those of you who still support this move, maybe you'd like to also encourage the minority group that tried to ban the pledge of allegiance from schools? Or, maybe you're glad that the boy scouts of America were punished for firing a scout leader who wanted to teach children about gay sex. Think they're different issues? Think again, because-

It's about control. Pure, totalitarian authority that otherwise ONLY existed under monarchies, communist regimes and the like. Heck, maybe tomorrow instead of oregon just banning 'books' from school (which they do, including American classics nationally accepted elsewhere), we can burn them, too? At least we'll have a use for all those left-over, novelty lighters....

*sigh* land of the free... Home, of the brave? 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Poking fun at the media

Yes, I know this is off topic of governmental conspiracies, and I apologize for that - but I couldn't resist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5rejhaYDOI
 
CNN Caption: Obama on Marijuana
 
and:
 
(where in the same speech Obama plans to) Smoke Out Terrorists

What does all this mean?
For a President who has so ADAMANTLY spoken against the legalization of marijuana, if left to himself and the media (and the fallacy of the American language), one *might* assert that Mr. Barrack Obama has a public relations issue that rivals George Bush Jr.
 
So.... the next time our so-called 'responsible' media people, (aka the liberals), rag consistently on Bush for his "mispronunciation" of the American language, they might want to consider Mr. Obama's "misuse" of the American language. Because, quite frankly, I'm not sure what's funnier - a President whose accent gave him trouble with the word 'nuclear,' or a President who is On Marijuana and smoking out terrorists.
 
Silly - yes. Worthwhile... maybe not. But, fun nonetheless!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why CAN'T the economy be fixed? (and a solution!)

The answer starts at the bottom end - with the people. No - not the work ethics or morality (although, that plays a HUGE part in it - and I 100% blame.. TOTALLY hold accountable, the media for setting the trends, status symbols and selfish standards that govern our world today). What governs our lives at the bottom end, through governmental injection into our daily lives, controlled by Capitalist demands on Democracy -
 
Equifax, Transunion, Experian, Check Systems, CLUE, et. al.
 
Ooohh... I'm just a person with bad credit who's complaining, right? No need for you to read on, right? So go - go away. Stop reading - now! I mean it! You'll just be poisoned by some whiner like me, won't you? What's that... you are at least 'interested' in what I have to say? Could that have something to do with the fact that the totalitarian authority of agencies like the ones I listed above, concern you, too? Even, if only, on an unconscious level? The truth is - that's why, you're still reading. Not because you're whining about a credit score (heck, maybe you're one of the lucky few with a HUGELY AWESOME credit score); but because you have come to understand that certain agencies, supposedly 'not' in governmental control, have had laws passed, without the vote of the people, allowing these agencies to govern our everyday lives. How is that possible? How can it be that private enterprise was allowed to take hold of our lives? These reports are used to not only control our eligibility for obtaining loans, but rental contracts, employment opportunities, car insurance, military eligibility, legal representation and a myriad of other, daily elements of our lives are CONTROLLED, by what's on the reports kept by these agencies.
 
Worse - it's already a well known and somehow, ACCEPTED, fact of life that the majority of these agencies have WRONG information, and it costs us, dearly! It's already an ACCEPTED fact, that we live in such FEAR of identity theft, and how it will affect our CREDIT scores, that a whole new industry, profitting from us and taking our hard earned money, is designed to keep bad guys from getting bad things on our credit reports. But wait.... here's the REAL KICK IN THE BUTTOCKS: It's the crediting companies, that have given good people such BAD scores that they can't qualify for loans, or to shop or to live... that has FORCED the identity theft industry!!!!!
 
Hold on!!??? Wait a second? Let me get this straight.... the CAR MECHANIC, supposedly, who was given the total control over OUR vehicle, at OUR cost, has intentionally yanked out the spark plugs so the car won't work, so that he can charge US MORE MONEY, to fix the car?
 
Yup, that's what it is. Try complaining.. go ahead. Did it work? Haven't tried yet... I'll wait. Any luck? Nope. Don't worry - I already knew you wouldn't get anywhere. You see, the authority by which these agencies have been given control, is through Capitalists urging Congress to forcibly pass bills, without our being aware these bills were even on the table, and then allowing the Capitalists to run wild with it. ....... This has been another fine example of Democracy in its most corrupted and polluted form... brought to you by... your Political representatives, who YOU voted in and trusted... living to make your life (well.. actually THEIRS'), a better place.
 
But, it doesn't stop there. The 'credit' scoring method (which I won't try to explain in here since it's so dang convoluted, corrupted and based, primarily, upon the rich vs. the wealthy.. but I digress.. go look it up for yourselves), not only governs our loans, it tells landlords who is 'rent' worthy and who is a 'risk.' It tells mortgage lenders who to trust and not trust. No - not YOU, not YOUR character, YOUR personality, YOUR dedication to having a better life - YOUR money is what defines you.  And, not by how much you have.. make no mistake.. by how much you spend, how much interest you're willing to incur, how quickly/well you pay it back, and thusly - how much money THEY will make off of you. Yes... that is the ACTUAL definition of revolving credit (in my humble opinion only). If you have TONS of credit.. you're a risk 'cause you might go out and spend it and incur more debt than you can pay. If you have NO credit, you're a risk because nobody knows how you'll spend your money. If you have too much debt, you're a risk because you may not be able to pay it all back. If you have an equal amount of debts, spending and expenses and an equal amount of credit.. then... you're okay. Hey - you're a GREAT person! Because each debt you have is interest that someone is making off of you!! Lenders think that's awesome - being able to determine who's eligible based upon who will profit them the most.... neat, huh?!!!
 
We do NOT live in a society where cash means anything. Why do you think this identity crisis thing is out of control? Because it really is? Yeah right - just look at the news and what they're telling you is happening - and maybe you'll see between the lines.. maybe not. But, they WANT you off of cash. They WANT you in a bank. But, be warned... if you screw up... even once... even slightly... you WILL suffer. Your employer can look at your credit report... and determine if you're a thief or unreliable. Car rental companies look at your credit report to determine if the 4 hour car you want to rent, that you pay for the insurance on, that you paid for in full, is a worthwhile 'risk' to them. Car insurance companies judge whether or not you're a safe driver by what your credit report says. No - NOT you. NOT your DRIVING record! Heaven forbid that we judge people's driving based on their driving records!!! It's all about the money. The cash. The dough. The greenbacks. The almighty, all powerful, uncontained.... AMERICAN CURRENCY!
 
Without it - you're nothing. Got TONS of money in the banks and are extremely wealthy? Doesn't matter.. what does your credit report say? (thus.. the fear instilled in you about identity theft... ooooo.... guess what?.... all your money means NOTHING). What about courts or law? They look at your credit reports... so do the police. Maybe Joe Blow down the street stole your credit card, or you dropped it and they picked it up and used it... and now YOU'RE responsible. No... NOT the money.. don't be SILLY! You can PROVE you were off on your yacht, sailing the world, not in Nevada, buying up millions in property. But - the law will still hold you responsible - because it WILL stay on your credit report. In England, the child pornography sting that sent hundreds of people to jail, included a report from the AMERICAN FBI, about credit card purchases for the unlawful materials... that were STOLEN cards. And out of the hundreds who were in danger or who went to jail, that didn't know what to do - DOZENS!! killed themselves. But, hey.. that's England, right?
 
In America... the land of the free and the home of the brave, where individuals were captured and placed in jail and tried in courts for purchasing child pornography with their credit cards (why? Because.. the FBI created a "crisis" and passed another law, without WE the people... and continues to use the media to make us believe we are being attacked on our own soil - playing on our fears an issue that is NOT out of control - bad, and must be dealt with - but in a legal and controlled way - not the way it is now), were later determined to be INNOCENT because their identities were stolen with their credit cards!! Unfortunately, that didn't matter for many, because the marks were on their credit scores and they had permanent arrest records/rap sheepts - and killed themselves. Go read about Mr. America, the U.S. Marine who served ALL OF US with DUTY and HONOR and COURAGE, who put a gun to his head during Mardi Gras because of the same, identical situation of identity theft I just described. Yeah - that's justice for you. He defended you - kept YOU and YOUR children safe, STOPPED terrorism, and had to go out with a gun to his OWN head, leaving behind those HE loved and would never get to see again because YOU people (well, some of you) are TOO ignorant to do something or say something about this. (sorry for the tangent - but HAD to be said)
 
What does it all mean? It's the credit bureaus that put us on alert for the use of credit cards. It's the credit bureaus that act WITHOUT regulation and can put false information on our reports and destroy our lives, that answer to the IRS EVERY TIME they SCREW UP (and they DO - ALOT!!!!!!!!!! AND WE PAY FOR IT!!!), that is our unConstitutionally, unDemocratically, accepted standard for judging us as people, that CAUSED this in the FIRST PLACE! It's the capitalists that are banking off of this system that are laughing at us in these hard, economic times. And, WHY, can't the economy be repaired?
 
The banks were told: here's the money - go lend. And they said, okay! All better, right? Homes saved. Jobs kept. Businesses still running, right? Nope. All gone. Why? BECAUSE - the credit bureaus, check systems, even CLUE, all have us - without our knowledge, our permission, our signing off on anything - without our being informed - EVER - in THEIR systems. And, if we DON'T meet the credit scoring standards - we DON'T get the financial help. So, what did the banks do with it all?
 
HAHAHAHA - they POCKETED it! And, thusly, they needed MORE MONEY to bail them out! AIG - TONS of money, right? All gone in corporate loans? Nope - it's in their banks to spend and play with, because they agreed to hand out insurance to everyone... WHO QUALIFIES. Have you NOT read the stories.. the TENS OF THOUSANDS... not hundreds...not thousands... TENS OF THOUSANDS of stories, in the past 5 YEARS ALONE (that's 4000+ stories every year for those of you keeping score), of people who thought they were doing great, went for their loans, went to refinance, went to get a mortgage, went out to do business as usual, but found themselves suddenly at the losing end of the battle because of the CREDIT BUREAUS, "lending index?" If you haven't - then you're BLIND. If you're ignorant to the subject - then it's time NOT TO BE ANYMORE!! These tens of thousands of people included individuals ranging from the middle class (as the poor usually don't waste their time.. think about it people), to the filthy rich. And, what happened? BILLIONS OF DOLLARS were lost. Taxes couldn't be paid. Businesses hit the dirt.. and guess what?
 
Here we are today. Sure - spend $785 BILLION... hey, why not spend 140 QUADRILLION? It won't matter. The money is NOT trickling down to the people, because Capitalism sank its claws into the people, THROUGH the government, and because of the GOVERNMENT, we are screwed. And, who's going to fix all this? The GOVERNMENT? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... no wait, sorry about that... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... no really, it's not funny... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - okay, okay - yes it is. It's HILARIOUS!!! Why? Because - the government's NOT STUPID. And, don't you believe for one second that they are. Don't you be fooled. Don't be hornswaggled by the media. The Government knows EXACTLY what they are doing. Even as I write this, Obama is meeting with "small business leaders" (which of course, means a few of the wealthiest... since small business is the WHOLE country and big business are the few who can meet in one meeting...), to discuss a bailout portion for them, to stimulate the economy through incentives for their hiring people.
 
Wait... won't the businesses CONTINUE to rely upon credit reports, check systems, CLUE, etc.? YES!! They will! Won't the monies that are being offered to them.. THROUGH THE BANKS... be dependent on their credit scores? YES, it will!!! So, how are the businesses that are struggling and don't have high enough credit scores going to profit? How are the people who have lost out from this economy going to be hired when their credit scores are too low?
 
Wait.. that's STUPID. It DOES NOT WORK! YES!! And, Uncle Obama, KNOWS it. So, why is he doing it? The equation, while I don't have it totally down, is, in its basic form, pretty straight forward: the politics of 'looking good,' keep the people stupid, is what it's all about. It keeps us from realizing the underlying truth of what's killing us financially, morally and ethically - governmental injection of capitalism and control into our very lives. It keeps people having 'hope,' where NONE is to be found. And, when .. NOT IF... WHEN... it fails, the government will be able to sink their OWN fangs in deeper. The only real IRONY, of ALL of this, is that when the government DOES... they'll turn on those creditors who use and instituted the credit bureau lending/renting/living score systems, TEAR them apart (and then they will have to realize the effects of their greed and selfishness WAY too late...includign the gvt. placing the blame on them totally and accepting no responsibility for their own actions), and then take control of the scoring system databases - and our lives - with ALL of our information - right OR wrong - and of course, we all know just how well kept government databases are, accuracy wise, that is. I pray I'm wrong - but I know I'm not.
 
The solution - simple: equal out everyone's credit scores to zero. Equal out Check Systems to zero. Equal out Clue to nothing. END clue, END check systems and limit the 3 credit bureaus to reporting of lending, not credit cards, change the scoring system to include income, give higher presidence to good than bad, remove all other reporting methods, withhold the ability of any lender to report anything for 1 year, then set a new standard that bases lending scores upon good credit to mean people who are maintaining their finances, not people who are out borrowing and making others rich through exorbitant interest rates. (btw - for those of you arguing against this - credit bureaus don't help lenders reclaim their money.. they are.. in truth.. the only known "legal" method that creditors have to THREATEN you to get back their money by "threatening" to ruin your lives with your credit reports [and thus, the truth in all that I've said thus far] .. and they DO this... IF they want their money, they can go to small claims court and get it back through a solid paper trail.. NOT threat or FEAR tactics). Base it upon a person's life, not the almighty, dollar bill. In fact.. take it a step further - and remove it altogether!! Now, everyone qualifies for a loan based on: do they make enough money to pay for the loan? See? Isn't that simple? Isn't that easy? If a person defaults on a mortgage, what does the bank do? They repo the house, then resell it, and make MORE money than if the person had paid it all themselves. I don't see anyone being hurt except the people who couldn't pay for their house? And, it wasn't because they were lied to or jerked around with interest rates, it was based on: do you make enough money now, and will it be enough in the future, to continue to pay for this loan? Why is that SO HARD? Hell, I couldn't get a loan until I get back to work - but as soon as I did, I could get enough of a one to quit paying $10k a year in rent (I know- I get lucky with such low rent), and pay $10k a year on a home. A standard 20-year loan - $150k home, that's it (the other $50k in the outrageous interest rates that HAVE to drop.. sheesh!). Simple. My car insurance - NOT inflated because of my credit score. Why? I would be judged based upon a GREAT driving history - not how much MONEY I make. Otherwise, the insurance companies.. hey.. JUST like AIG, get to be rich by helping to SCREW the American economy, and violate our rights, in States where insurance is legally required, to be given insurance without bias of age, income, race, religion, etc.! Let's fix it, shall we? Even poorer folks, like myself, can qualify for rentals without living in fear! Maybe, we can EVEN get jobs. And, this time, if we screw up - IF - it is no longer a matter of 'risk' - which is to say: WE ARE CURRENTLY BEING ASSUMED GUILTY FROM THE BEGINNING AND HAVE TO PROVE OUR INNOCENCE REPEATEDLY TO EVERYONE AND ARE BEING PUNISHED FOR SIMPLY "LIVING" IN THIS SO-CALLED 'FREE' AND 'GREAT' COUNTRY; but we can be held accountable IF we screw up, and have a chance to succeed - JUST LIKE our FOREFATHERS INTENDED. And, that system, hurt Nobody except those who couldn't pay their debts, for a VERY long time in this country; and it WORKED. There was no reason for the credit bureau change EXCEPT to support corporate greed and wealth. It's simple, folks... see? Not that hard, is it? Even the stimulus - would suddenly work, because the banks would FINALLY make the loans demanded of them and [unfortunately] continue to charge their outrageous interest (that they never pay back to their investors..... you know... the people... oddly enough... for those of you with a checking or so-called 'savings' account.. you understand what I'm saying), and people can afford to live, the economy can prosper, and hey - we'd all be in a better place financially than we are now!! Think about it...
 
There is a terrible storm coming... will you build your house from bricks.. or continue to live in straw huts?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We don't need Mary Poppins - we NEED the TRUTH (pt 2)

Continuing on... you see... one of the very, most precious gifts that the Lord has seen fit to bestow upon me is: vision. You can call it prophecy, strangeness, illusions, delusions, dreams, whatever. Personally, I don't care what you call it. When you read the following, perhaps you'll see what I mean:
 
You see, I saw this army. They were slothful and fat. They were dumb and lazy. They fought amongst themselves, hurting each other. They stayed in their armor, dirty, smelly, constantly stuffing their faces, falling asleep in between everything they had to do and so on. Why? Because, the government that commanded them, that ordered them to kill and commit corruption and help them get away with anything they wanted, that government knew, that the BEST way to control these people was to keep them happy - all the time. Keep the wool over their eyes. If these people weren't fat and eating themselves to death, they were tired and asleep. If they weren't doing either of those, they were doing what the government told them. If one of them got injured and complained (as I saw two of them fight, the bigger one cutting off the smaller ones' arm and the smaller one running around for help), nobody listened. Nobody responded. They let him bleed to death and die. Everybody was too preoccupied with themselves to care. They wore their 'armor' like it was some kind of security blanket. They believed their personal power and authority to be absolute because they were given whatever they wanted.
 
Meanwhile - the people suffered. That food did not come for free. It came from the starving homes of children. They were fed sweets and candies and all sorts of "goodies", that were, in reality, very, very bad for them. Their sense of 'justice,' hurting the innocent, even one another, without consideration for morality, lef them to self-indulgance. Their constantly falling asleep simply kept them busy and out of the way. Whenever someone cried out for help, there may have been a spark.. an inkling of interest... but it soon faded. How does this relate to our current society?
 
Simple: we have been lead into self-indulgance, greed and desensitization by the very authorities we trusted to be the shepards. Think I'm being an 'extremist?' Maybe you haven't noticed the cars on the road - the people who pass by the starving and homeless, desensitized to the fact that there REALLY ARE quite a few people out there in need, even if they appear not to be, and instead, pay CASH to 'beautify' the hunk of INANIMATE steel that they call their vehicles - as it's their status symbol. Maybe you haven't noticed your dependence on radio and television. Maybe you haven't noticed that when a news story comes up and we all get excited, it disappears and switches to the next topic before it's ever done and we don't even remember what the last one was! Still don't believe me? How many of you remember who Terri Schiavo is? C'mon - how many? What was the case about? Hey - doesn't matter that the media should have stayed the hell out of it and the law was wrong to intervene in the way they did - but the truth is - who remembers? Who knew about the thousands and thousands of OTHERS who are in hospitals, at the same time Shiavo was, suffering from the same fate? Or, about the millions who have been suffering that fate for the past 30+ years?
 
Here's the one truth above all others I can COMPLETELY assure you of:
 
You don't want to know the truth.
 
I mean that. Not as a 'warning,' but as a 'matter-of-fact' statement. You, personally, would rather NOT know the world is ending, NOT know the economy is failing, NOT know that bad things are going to happen. And, the media KNOWS it! They've been training you, at the order of the shepards (government), for countless years now. They've been masterfully convincing you that death, gangs, violence and such factors are not really, "that big of a deal." Well, that is, unless the Feds suddenly 'want' it to be, and suddenly, there's a "crisis!" Remember the 80's? Remember the stories that made people live in fear in big cities, that you would be carjacked, at gunpoint, at every intersection? You don't? Either you're too young... and it's time you realize that you NEED to be educated for YOURSELF... or you were trained to ignore it and move on. How many of you remember the "AIDS" epidemic? Where did that go? The "Killer bees?" The "Bird flu".... people.. "ANTHRAX?" Where have these things gone? Go ahead - take a sealed, manilla envelope to a courthouse, with documentation to turn in, stand in line and try to open it up in front of the court clerk. Know what he/she's going to tell you? GO OUTSIDE and do that. They're not allowed to let you open the envelopes in the courthouse because of the Anthrax concern. You can't bring sealed documents into a courthouse for that reason!! But... where'd the story go? Since when did we ALL become the terrorists?
 
It's simple. Mary Poppins... isn't real. Sorry. Hate to spoil it for you, but she's only the representation of the good within each and everyone of us if we ever chose to look for it. Her umbrella is love. Her smile is charity. Her gift was not profit, for in truth, it came with a price. If we want things to be better in our lives, we have to WORK for it. No, I'm NOT talking about the daily, grinding, boring, unrewarding and unrelenting job you have simply so you can pay off some debts and continue to incur others, hoping against hope to stay in that "comfort" zone; I'm talking about yourselves, your friends, and your family.
 
This isn't a 'cheery,' lovey, make you feel all warm-hearted turn around. It's the truth. In the vision I was given, the one person who watched all of this pain could sit by no longer. They began to fight back. Sure, the guards... the people... who had been kept in limbo, were gong to suffer and be hurt. They were going to find themselves at the ends of boots and fistacuffs, not out of anger, but out of love. Something HAD to break their routine. Unfortunately, in the world we're in, there's only one 'wake up' call that can be severe enough to aid the vast majority now:
 
War. Not even natural disasters work anymore. Look at South west America. What happened to the south? What happened to the people? Do you even know? A tsunami SO powerful, that it flooded multiple CITIES, wiped out homes and destroyed lives... but... the media, who capitalized on it when it happened, quickly buried it to keep you from caring. What about the flood that hit asia and killed over 100,000 people? The orphaned children? Have you heard about them? It profitted the media... and then *poof*, just like magic, it went away. You see, when the media tries to be "mary poppins," they swoop in, make everything look good, take their money and then leave. But, unlike Mary Poppins, they don't actually fix anything. In fact, just the opposite. They end up making things worse because we never had time to deal with the original problems that were there and are suddenly encountering newer, even more devastating problems! Be afraid folks.. be very afraid. And if you aren't now.. you will be ... you will be. (no... I'm not paying Lucasfilms for that either.... nor am I getting paid, so we can call it even).
 
We need the truth. we need to know everything sucks. This isn't because we 'need' a downer. We're ALREADY in a depressed state. This is the most depressed nation of people in the UNIVERSE.. at any given time in all of HISTORY! But, when a person's down, what do you do? Do you sit in there and tell a manic depressive, "hey bud, it's gonna be okay,"? Do you look in at the person sitting in the bath tub, getting ready to slice their wrists open or drop a hair dryer in the water with them and say, "Don't look so glum, buddy, things are gonna work out!"? YOUR positivity makes people MORE depressed. Maybe things WILL work out. Maybe they'll just work out for YOU. But, by pretending everything's beautiful - we are only MASKING the truth. By ignoring the problem, we are only letting it GET WORSE. You have to step up to the people, you have to take 'em by the hand and say, "HEY - YEAH - things SUCK - things are BAD - and probably, they are going to get WORSE! AND, I can't promise you I can fix them, or they'll EVER get fixed, but sitting here sulking, sitting here getting ready to give up... even sitting here PRETENDING that your house is NOT on fire will ONLY BURN YOU."
 
What is it the President said that the news jumped all over? (now remember... I'm NOT an Obama supporter... but here's the truth): He said: People, the economy's bad. Things don't look good. We need change NOW. We need to do something immediately or we're all going to fail.
 
So, why did the government (aka controllers of and via the media), slap down the request for positivity. People WERE listening to the President and WERE trying to get prepared for the worst. They WERE watching the news and saying, "hey - we're all being cheated and lead like lambs to the slaughter - we NEED change." But, it wasn't the change the President wanted. The government didn't want us involved. Instead, they realized their mistake. Rather than us just accepting their totalitarian authority, we were going to rebel, and in order to appease the masses, they are filling our plates with "goodies," they are shrouding us in "armor," and they are trying to quietly separate themselves from us. The results?
 
Those "goodies," these "incentives", the "stimulus package," and other factors... are actually NOT good for us at all, and we will suffer for indulging in them.
The "armore," the 'protective blanket,' that tells people to spend, spend, spend, people to be okay with the idea their nest egg will return, people not taking action against AIG, believing the government is doing it for them, will wake up from their slumber only to find their armor was cheap ol' plastic and aluminum, and when the sword comes down, we will be hurt... badly.
And, their separation... well... you've read George Orwell's, 1984, haven't you? What about Ayn Rand's, When Atlas Shrugged? (1984 is on video for those of you lazy people.. like me :)... don't know if atlas shrugged is.. you can look it up if you want). If you have.. then you've been warned.. you're just ignoring it. If you haven't... then you're the ones who are going to suffer doubly, unaware that the tsunami will hit.
 
It takes one person, folks. A guy from Texas told the IRS - "I'm not paying taxes. You can't make our elected officials do it.. who are NOT above the law... you can't make me do it." Another gentleman followed after a senator and caught up with him in the white house, on camera, and video tapped his attempts at forcing the Senator to answer the question, "Why are YOU not being held responsible for your actions and how can YOU represent the people if you're cheating them?"
 
But, do you hear about them now? Nope. The news doesn't want you to hear that 'negativity.'?????
 
Finally... let's not forget one, important point. Mary Poppins - the REAL story of Mary Poppins - wasn't the kind nanny who 'shielded' anyone from the truth. She was adamant that the solution to the problem can only come when we face the REAL problem. She didn't tell the children the banks were corrupt or deceiptful. She didn't tell them their father was just another corrupted bureaucrat. She told him the truth about the world around him. The little old lady who feeds the birds really COULD use their support. THAT was a worthy cause. She didn't diss on the banks. She didn't tear into "father." She let them destroy themselves, but cound only do so by EDUCATING the children with the truth. You cannot defend yourself if you are not equipped. You need the truth. You need to believe in what's right. You need to stand up. You need to not let the few who have tried be the only ones. No one rose up after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. fell, and because of it, his dream was corrupted (referring back to the post regarding the boondocks and segregation). The impoverished CAN'T do it alone. YOU - ALL of you - must fight. Think you're going to risk what you have? What have you got? Really... what is it? What is so valuable to you that you don't believe in freedom? Your stuff? ... too sad for me to comment on.... Your family? Sure.. till they get hit with the 200 - 400% tax increase, and money will tear everything apart.. war will tear it apart....
 
Maybe your wealth? What you profit from today, will have to be taken away tomorrow - when you'll need it the most - to pay for everything you were given today. Your life? What life? What are you here for? What are you working for? What are you doing? Don't be afraid to be the one. It has to be a chain.. it has to continue.. and only when our voices raise.. only when one.. after another.. after another.. fight.. die and care MORE about the future then themselves.. does change happen.
 
Just look at Christ. If it was good enough for the Son of GOD, to die as a mortal, to save the people; and His disciples to do the same, then should we not quit inflating our egoes and also stand up?..... think about it... not today.. not tomorrow.. but soon....
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We don't need Mary Poppins - we NEED the TRUTH (pt 1)

It's all over the news; the media has been having a feeding frenzy on the issue: positivity. Barrack Obama needs to be more 'positive' in his speeches. The media needs to be more 'positive'. There are articles being published, calling for the media and press to start reporting 'good times,' not negativity.
 
But, does trying to transform the President and the media into a virtual 'Mary Poppins,' come with a price?
 
The answer is: yes; a very, very steep price. Here's the truth:
  • The economy has failed.
  • Democracy has failed.
  • Capitalism has failed.
  • Greed has led us down the poophole.
  • Churches have quit offering the truth.
  • The government's level of corruption is at an all-time high.
  • Government spending is out of control.
  • Our future generations are about to be totally screwed.
  • We NEED change NOW - not tomorrow or in a few years, NOW.
  • IF change doesn't happen, all of us alive today, WILL feel the terrible effects before it's over - and we WILL suffer too.
 
Sound very positive? No? Let me "Mary Poppinize" it for you in the way the media would like to see it:
  • Hey, the economy will get better, don't worry.. spend, spend, spend!
  • The Government's not responsible... past government's were, and this is a brand new day and age of honesty and integrity!
  • Don't blame corporate America, corporate greed is a good thing, it stimulates fair growth for small businesses and all of us.
  • You have every RIGHT to DEMAND MORE money... and we SHOULD spend more.. it's a good thing...
  • Separation of Church and State is an 'old school' philosophy, we need to do it Rome's way, where the government commands religion and policies exist to FORCE specific variations in faith...
  • Our politicians are there for US! They love us and care! They won't do ANYTHING that we wouldn't want them to do!
  • Don't worry about the 'free' money, we'll print more. After all, if you still have checks in your checkbook, are you REALLY broke?
  • The future generations don't know what's good for them. We do. We'll fix it.. just wait it out and see.. and if it's too late to fix it later, well, then we can all look back and laugh at this, right?
  • Change will come, just keep trudging away in your lives, and you'll see... aren't things getting better right now?
  • It's our job today, to care about tomorrow, and we can make the difference, we'll just add the taxation later on... and of course, there's no need to concern ourselves with a 400% tax increase on future generations... they'll have TONS of money, won't they?
Hmmm.... well, I don't know about you, but I feel SO much better! Whew! What a relief! Things are looking GREAT! I'm not gonna worry about unemployment, failing small businesses or HUGE government spending bills. I'm not gonna let AIG or the banks get me down! I'm going forward now! I'm preparing for my future! I'm... what's that? What do you mean I didn't have the money to spend? What do you mean the stock prices are still falling and I've lost everything? What do you mean I have nowhere to live? What do I do now?
 
What do you mean you have no answers because we wiped ourselves out? Didn't Mary Poppins save us? Didn't her umbrella of protection against the storms bring us new hopes? Didn't the bank hire back the family head that they fired so brutally and unjustifiably (as he finally stood against their greed), and give him a raise and higher rank and position? WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE MOVIES AREN'T REAL???
 
Folks, it's called the primrose path:
Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,
Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven,
Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine,
Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads
And recks not his own rede.
 
Hypocrisy. It's pure and simple. The doctor is dedicated to healing people... which is to say, 'he cares about people,' .... but only those who can afford it, which is, in contrast, to say, 'he doesn't care for people.' The politician is dedicated to representing the interests and needs of the people who elect him, which is to say, 'he is there to serve the people,' .... but passes bills without them, generates money for the government and his own raises, which is, in contrast, to say, 'he serves himself.' The police officer is dedicated to enforcing laws against lawbreaking citizens, which is to say, 'he serves the interests of justice for the safety of the people,'.... but instead, matlock isn't real, the detectives constantly attack and berate innocent people, shoot innocent people, imprison innocent people, stalk the people assuming their guilt and constantly lie because they don't care about hurting the innocent majority to get a few bad guys to get their money raises and exert/show off their power, which is, in contrast, to say, 'they serve their personal agendas.' This list goes on...
 
Congress just announced that they are going to, "end this foolish, automatic, cost of living increase, which, in these hard economic times, is ridiculous and unfair to the people." [They are now going to require a vote to pass cost of living increases]...
 
.... okay... stay with me on this one... (trying not to laugh out loud here)....
 
Congress did NOT, just announce, that they are going to stop giving "themselves" continuous raises, but rather, they are going to stop seeing to it that the American public, the PEOPLE, stop getting cost of living wage increases unless it is voted upon. Wait a second.. wasn't it... "we the people," who voted in to have the cost of living increases? Who remembers this? C'mon --- I know YOU do! YOU remember that YOU WANTED your employers to be forced to adjust their minimum wage levels for cost of living increases!! But, it doesn't MATTER what YOU want. YOU'RE JUST the PEON voter who means NOTHING in a Democracy. Now, Congress will vote on it.. FOR YOU. In fact, the cost of living increase vote also helped limit the old, Congress-giving-themselves-automatic-raises-whenever  the heck they wanted to, procedure. But, now, Congress will get to reinstate that. Fix the "old" Bush ways that were so screwed up.. you know... the ones that said the people's wages have to be adjusted for the cost of living increases? Remember that now?
 
When we are LIED to - when we are lead to believe that everything's 'beautiful,' we are NOT dealing with the Mary Poppins' of the world.. oh no... we are dealing with the Bernie Madoffs. We are dealing with the Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's. We are dealing with the CORRUPTED, GREEDY, SELFISH people that are trying to get their OWN agendas by you by "snow-jobbing" you. Why do they want you to be happy? Well... let me 'splain.... in part 2.. hee hee hee
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop, Obama Time! The Changer pt. 2

It's time for the Barack Obama miracle hour. In this (third) article in this series, we'll take a fairly thorough look into how this amazing man will reform the country and bring us peace so that we can all live happily ever after...
 
Yes - that was sarcasm. Just in case you missed it - go back and re-read it, thanks!
 
In New York, in September of this year, Mr. Obama said the following:
“I believe that America's free market has been the engine of America's great progress. It's created a prosperity that is the envy of the world. It's led to a standard of living unmatched in history. And it has provided great rewards to the innovators and risk-takers who have made America a beacon for science, and technology, and discovery…We are all in this together. From CEOs to shareholders, from financiers to factory workers, we all have a stake in each other's success because the more Americans prosper, the more America prospers.”
 
First - thank goodness he clarified that our free market has lead to our progrress. I'd hate to think it's a war-driven, all-powerful nature to build bigger and better weapons of mass destruction..... hmmm? Envy of the world... his dad is from Nigeria, right? I'm pretty sure in Nigeria, they might have some envy. Of course, 60% of the other world thinks we're idiots and 2% is trying to kill us and 10% wants us to stay away. Not sure that amounts to envy. Wasn't it Nixon who said America should be respected? That the loss of that respect is what needs to be regained? Not sure Nixon was so concerned about televisions and cars as a sign of success, but family, integrity and freedom. As far as our standards of living - let us make no mistake on what that means (even if Barack is clueless): that is a personal choice. Setting one's standards higher and higher is based on a system of greed, wealth and corruption. Not entirely sure if he meant that - or if he really is that crude. Of course, you might be lead to believe he DID mean that when you realize the risk-takers that made us a beacon for science and yadda yadda are not Americans. In fact, the majority are other countries. So, to that regard, he is right - they have benefited tremendsouly. But, of course, all of us Americans are in the same boat together. Obama, the politicans and the elite wealthy are on the upper part of the Titanic with access to the life rafts, and the rest of us are shoved in holes in the bottom of the ship unaware of the locking doors waiting to prevent us from being able to flee as well. And, while Obama lists CEOs down to financiers and then is kind enough to include factory workers - which includes upper management, this does NOT include (again) the rest of us on the bottom of the boat who make up the labor force of America upon whose shoulders the others in that list - stand. And, I'm not too sure about that last line. Let's see, Forbes has the largest list ever of billionaires in the U.S.A., and yet, we are at the highest unemployment and poverty rates, ever. Somehow - I don't really see the focus of money as a way of life having done us much good - but let's see what else he offers:
 
Fortunately, Obama has determined what the problem with the economy is, today:

Wages are Stagnant as Prices Rise:
While wages remain flat, the costs of basic necessities are increasing. The cost of in-state college tuition has grown 35 percent over the past five years. Health care costs have risen four times faster than wages over the past six years. And the personal savings rate is now the lowest it's been since the Great Depression.
FACT: So, essentially, what he could have - or SHOULD have said is: The cost of living is increasing while wages, are not. Pretty sure, this is right on the money.

Tax Cuts for Wealthy Instead of Middle Class:
The Bush tax cuts give those who earn over $1 million dollars a tax cut nearly 160 times greater than that received by middle-income Americans. At the same time, this administration has refused to tackle health care, education and housing in a manner that benefits the middle class.
FACT: Ah, see now, in my last article, I was wrong. Obama didn't want to give the wealthy bigger tax cuts than the poor, he wanted to make the tax cuts uneven across the board. While the wealthy receive a greater margin, it's because they make MORE money. But, that's okay... we can ignore this for now. There does need to be more equality. Of course, we've seen no change in health care reform - in this, or the PREVIOUS administration, education OR housing. And, for whom? That's right - the middle class. Isn't that indicative of where Obama was at BEFORE he began running? I wonder - would we benefit MORE from someone who was in the poor class, so that way, we can ALL benefit? But no - forge the poor - they aren't part of the problem, they're the dirt to clean up later. The rich are the problem - although his new plan is... well... you'll see:

Enact a Windfall Profits Tax to Provide a $1,000 Emergency Energy Rebate to American Families:
Barack Obama will enact a windfall profits tax on excessive oil company profits to give American families an immediate $1,000 emergency energy rebate to help families pay rising bills. This relief would be a down payment on Obama's long-term plan to provide middle-class families with at least $1,000 per year in permanent tax relief.
FACT: NOBODY READS what this man has to say - otherwise, someone would have tried to eat him by now. An immediate, $1000 emergency rebate - to THOSE who qualify by cutting into oil companies, increasing gas prices and doing nothing to control the rising prices offered by power companies who can now pocket their $1000 bucks and raise prices, hiding behind the rebate. And, of course - this rebate - which isn't really to us - as it is a TAX to help jumpstart the economy (um, really - is anyone home out there?), is part of the down payment to the GOVERNMENT to build a long-term fund to make a $1000 kicker. Betcha the rich aren't going to fund this - so I guess that leaves.. the middle class, who will then, be essentially, getting nothing for giving the same amount, and the poor who will lose overall.
 
Provide $50 billion to Jumpstart the Economy and Prevent 1 Million Americans from Losing Their Jobs: This relief would include a $25 billion State Growth Fund to prevent state and local cuts in health, education, housing, and heating assistance or counterproductive increases in property taxes, tolls or fees. Obama’s relief plan will also include $25 billion in a Jobs and Growth Fund to prevent cutbacks in road and bridge maintenance and fund school re­pair - all to save more than 1 million jobs in danger of being cut.
FACT: YOU NEED TO READ THIS CAREFULLY. $50 billion - in MORE taxes. half goes to states - that's $20 billion (no - NOT $25 once Federal overhead is accounted for), to 50 states, meaning $4 billion per state. Is that the issue in health, education, housing, assistance or added property taxes? Nope. That will touch the tip of most icebergs, property taxes will still rise along with this tax - and we're really in trouble. But - there's hope! The other $25 billion is to prevent job cuts to.. um... what? Road and bridge maintenance and school repair? Isn't the Department of Transportation, a government funded business in charge of roads and bridges? So - it's saving the government money - costing us and saving jobs for government employees - not us? Wow - segregation has reached an all-time high. How about shool repairs? I'm pretty sure, that's not the biggest of issues - but funding chidlren always makes people look good. Of course - that's USING children for personal gain - but he's a candidate for President, so it's okay, right? After that $20 billion is broken down with a heavy side going to the government, the schools will see a little, and prevailing wage jobs will see a lot. Thank goodness we ALL work for the road department and are in commercial construction!
 
Obama will cut income taxes by $1,000 for working families to offset the payroll tax they pay.
FACT: Forgetting the losses from his health care program - that income tax money has to come from somewhere. So - the other classes pay for it. How AWESOME! This isn't a kicker, either - don't be fooled. This is a reduction in the amount you have to pay - if you're a 'working,' family and qualify, not a middle class family with special conditions... hmmm?
 
Provide a Tax Cut for Working Families: Obama will restore fairness to the tax code and provide 150 million workers the tax relief they need. Obama will create a new "Making Work Pay" tax credit of up to $500 per person, or $1,000 per working family. The "Making Work Pay" tax credit will completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans.
FACT: 150 million americans getting the tax relief they need versus 10 million americans not paying income tax DOESN'T COMPUTE. I have no more to say on this - if you can't read this and see the problem - you're too rich, too dumb - a government official - or something else I won't say because it's too crude!
 
Eliminate Income Taxes for Seniors Making Less than $50,000: Barack Obama will eliminate all income taxation of seniors making less than $50,000 per year. This proposal will eliminate income taxes for 7 million seniors and provide these seniors with an average savings of $1,400 each year. Under the Obama plan, 27 million American seniors will also not need to file an income tax return.
FACT: Obama is a SAINT! After all, we know about ALL THOSE old folks who are making bank on their social security! WOOHOO! Wait, um - no they aren't! And, where in the heck does this money come from? Well, I see - it will eliminate taxes for 7 million seniors. So, out of the 85 million + seniors in the country - 7 million just got a complete break. Guess he was thinking of his parents for this one! Of course, 27 million other seniors won't need to file a tax return because they're so dang poor, he'll finally quit draining them into impoverishment. Now, those bed-ridden seniors in homes who can't move can finally quit eating only pudding and not what the other get because their money won't go to feed the government! I wonder though - without taxing the middle class, or seniors.. where is all this money coming from? Let's move on, shall we?

Simplify Tax Filings for Middle Class Americans:
Obama will dramatically simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes. Obama will ensure that the IRS uses the information it already gets from banks and employers to give taxpayers the option of pre-filled tax forms to verify, sign and return. Experts estimate that the Obama proposal will save Americans up to 200 million total hours of work and aggravation and up to $2 billion in tax preparer fees.
FACT: Barack Obama is from Mars - because he doesn't operate within the functionality of reality that is EARTH! No - no - we are NOT being mean here. We are being factual. We are NOT saying that we will move to a simplified form - we will move to a pre-filled out form by the IRS - who operates in sheer perfection and without ANY error, via his new on-line, electronic filing system that stays under one, singular, government control and monitors all communications, to save us up to 200 million total hours of the aggravation cause by whom... the IRS and their current system of complicating everything and messing it all up. Thank goodness, those people that have been paying out $2 billion in tax preparer fees won't have to anymore. From now on, the tax accountants are going to be without jobs, not part of the job-saving program and you won't get to take advantage of every possible deduction or out you have for the government to take what THEY want. (of course.. 200 million total hours is spread across 220 million adults, meaning less than 1 hour per person - to give up complete control the savior - Obama-son!)
 
Fight for Fair Trade: Obama will fight for a trade policy that opens up foreign markets to support good American jobs. He will use trade agreements to spread good labor and environmental standards around the world and stand firm against agreements like the Central American Free Trade Agreement that fail to live up to those important benchmarks. Obama will also pressure the World Trade Organization to enforce trade agreements and stop countries from continuing unfair government subsidies to foreign exporters and nontariff barriers on U.S. exports.
FACT: Good American jobs - abroad? How is this an economy issue if he is spreading labor and environmental standards around the world? Oh, I see - we won't buy from those really cheap-o countries that use forced labor! HA HA! We'll spend tax payer money to ignore them, increase the cost of goods by bringins it here to America and then increase taxes again to fight for our overseas trade and force our way into other countries. That's liberalism and Democracy for you in its purest form! Well, that is - if liberalism and Democracy looked more like Communism and an empire.
 
Improve Transition Assistance: To help all workers adapt to a rapidly changing economy, Obama would update the existing system of Trade Adjustment Assistance by extending it to service industries, creating flexible education accounts to help workers retrain, and providing retraining assistance for workers in sectors of the economy vulnerable to dislocation before they lose their jobs.
FACT: If you aren't reading this and you find yourself standing in the street unemployed - too late. Did you understand this? His new plan WILL cause tens of millions of Americans to become vulnerable to lost jobs. We fix this by retraining everybody for all the jobs we're going to eliminate. That should only require an additional $120 billion or so - thank goodness the tax breaks will exempt certain classes....
 
End Tax Breaks for Companies that Send Jobs Overseas: Barack Obama believes that companies should not get billions of dollars in tax deductions for moving their operations overseas. Obama will also fight to ensure that public contracts are awarded to companies that are committed to American workers.
FACT: Wouldn't it be neat to live in a world where the government was stupid enough to send away American jobs, and then, try to rectify it by no longer offering them 'tax breaks.' I'm sure that will hurt.. um.. nobody. And thank goodness there are going to be public contracts to American only countries. That's the way to ensure that an elite, select group, just as it is now, continues to get those contracts.

Invest in our Next Generation Innovators and Job Creators:
Obama will create an Advanced Manufacturing Fund to identify and invest in the most compelling advanced manufacturing strategies. The Fund will have a peer-review selection and award process based on the Michigan 21st Century Jobs Fund, a state-level initiative that has awarded over $125 million to Michigan businesses with the most innovative proposals to create new products and new jobs in the state.
FACT: Sorry charlie, unless you're one of the 'cool,' guys in the green sector - this doesn't mean you. Don't get excited.
 
Invest In A Clean Energy Economy And Create 5 Million New Green Jobs: Obama will invest $150 billion over 10 years to advance the next generation of biofuels and fuel infrastructure, accelerate the commercialization of plug-in hybrids, promote development of commercial scale renewable energy, invest in low emissions coal plants, and begin transition to a new digital electricity grid. The plan will also invest in America's highly-skilled manufacturing workforce and manufacturing centers to ensure that American workers have the skills and tools they need to pioneer the first wave of green technologies that will be in high demand throughout the world.
FACT: Money doesn't drop magically from the sky. $150 BILLION? For biofuels? Folks - I'm in that industry - and the government spends globs of money on research, time, research, time, research, and then when it comes down to it - um, sometimes a project or two. And, what kind of research? Let's see - the renewable energies industry is already solid - so, maybe we should check and see if wood burns in a fire place more effeciently than out in the open. Think that sounds stupid? Don't. Several states have funded this research with YOUR tax dollars ALREADY! Hybrids. Well - solve the gas crises by supporting an industry of $56,000+ cars that only the higher middle class can afford, give them to the government, forge the rest of the country, and, oh yeah - the electric companies make bank on a new grid that we DON'T need. And, of course - again - no dude, this isn't you. You have to be the HIGHLY skilled workforce to get the added training to create green technologies for the... wait... world? What about helping America? Something's strange...

Create New Job Training Programs for Clean Technologies:
The Obama plan will increase funding for federal workforce training programs and direct these programs to incorporate green technologies training, such as advanced manufacturing and weatherization training, into their efforts to help Americans find and retain stable, high-paying jobs. Obama will also create an energy-focused youth jobs program to invest in disconnected and disadvantaged youth.
FACT: Whenever you see some neat, new idea that includes 'Youth,' beware! This is using our sympathies for children for his gain - meaning that his efforts aren't completely on the up and up. Let's see - a federal workforce.... not public... hmm... green technologies to be incorporated, not focused on - meaning government controlled power companies... for the public to find and retain stable, high paying jobs. But, aren't government jobs funded by the public? How does ... that ... work? No public jobs - no gvt. jobs?
 
Barack Obama believes that it is critically important for the United States to rebuild its national transportation infrastructure – its highways, bridges, roads, ports, air, and train systems – to strengthen user safety, bolster our long-term competitiveness and ensure our economy continues to grow.
FACT: These are government jobs. This is money for the government. This does not improve our safety. These tasks are multi billion to multi trillion dollar tasks. Here's the goofy part - this ensures our economy grows because of rebuilding all the roads? Um.. what? why? Aren't we constantly maintaining them now? How does this bolster 'our' competitiveness? With whom? Who are we competing with - not fully knowing who 'we' are in the first place - that new roads will make us better than them? What happens if we win? If we lose? Make no mistake - I have researched this topic - and it will cost us severely. Try to look up the maglev train projects - for instance, in the Pacific Northwest - and see how many hundreds of billions this takes for one state. Then, you'll get the tip of the iceberg.
 
Barack Obama will increase federal support for research, technology and innovation for companies and universities so that American families can lead the world in creating new advanced jobs and products.
FACT: YES! More money for more college students to find neat, new ways of doing things. Not too many new ways that the worker at McDonalds can serve that burger though. I suppose they won't mind paying for this though...
 
Invest in the Sciences: Barack Obama supports doubling federal funding for basic research and changing the posture of our federal government from being one of the most anti-science administrations in American history to one that embraces science and technology. This will foster home-grown innovation, help ensure the competitiveness of US technology-based businesses, and ensure that 21st century jobs can and will grow in America.
FACT: Let me tell you this is a bald-face lie. We are not anti-science. Our colleges are doing awesome. We do NOT support the little guy who may or may not have a good idea. Back-yard inventors, the kinds that have REALLY changed this nation, are being pushed away. This is because of federal policy. His increase in business funding - does NOT fix this, offer an education that will get these companies to listen to the back yard inventors and is VERY dangerous. It takes money for what will be known as black-box projects that we will never see. Conspiracy? no - it actually says otherwise if you read it carefully.
 
Deploy Next-Generation Broadband: Barack Obama believes we can get broadband to every community in America through a combination of reform of the Universal Service Fund, better use of the nation's wireless spectrum, promotion of next-generation facilities, technologies and applications, and new tax and loan incentives.
FACT: This is expensive. Broadband really isn't the problem - the problem is that the government plans on doing this by taking full control of a centralized location for this. After all - how do you think his health care reform package, centralizing the nation's medical information would otherwise, be supported? Better use of the wireless spectrum? Well - that WOULD be nice. But, spending more money or giving cause for companies like Sprint to build new technology buildings means that its already garbage customer service - GETS WORSE!
 
Provide Tax Relief for Small Businesses and Start Up Companies: Barack Obama will eliminate all capital gains taxes on start-up and small businesses to encourage innovation and job creation. Obama will also support small business owners by providing a $500 “Making Work Pay” tax credit to almost every worker in America. Self-employed small business owners pay both the employee and the employer side of the payroll tax, and this measure will reduce the burdens of this double taxation
FACT: Now the middle class is getting $1000 per person for those involved in this. But, Obama has finally fixed the double taxation issue! Now - the employee and business no longer BOTH pay on payroll taxes! The business alone pays BOTH their share and the employee's share! Wait.. hold up, maybe I'm wrong here, but something seems amiss. If both taxes are still being paid, isn't that.. double taxation - still? I wonder.. if Barack said one of the problems is stagnant wage increases, how businesses will be able to increase wages if their paying BOTH taxes? I also wonder - if wages won't be forcibly dropped after 3 years of this program? Think it's still cool to vote for Barack Obama?
IT'S DOWNRIGHT DANGEROUS TO EVERYONE.
 
Create a National Network of Public-Private Business Incubators: Barack Obama will support entrepreneurship and spur job growth by creating a national network of public-private business incubators. Business incubators facilitate the critical work of entrepreneurs in creating start-up companies. Obama will invest $250 million per year to increase the number and size of incubators in disadvantaged communities throughout the country.
FACT: Don't be confused by the word incubators - it really does mean middle man that supports the government, and has limited funds to the entrepreneurs. That $250 million a year - isn't for the entrepreneurs - re read it - it's for the middle men. Sheesh. This is too stupid to have even said! What's wrong with this man?
 
Obama will strengthen the ability of workers to organize unions. He will fight for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. Obama will ensure that his labor appointees support workers' rights and will work to ban the permanent replacement of striking workers. Obama will also increase the minimum wage and index it to inflation to ensure it rises every year.
FACT: Now we're really hitting the nail on the head! More unions! YES - that SO HELPED THIS COUNTRY the first time the government did this. Of course.. what it did, was help us into tremendous debt and unemployment. Wanna know more? Go ask Lee Iacoca! What an idiot. We need to abolish unions that belong to say (for example) - the police workforce, that SUCK OUR POCKETS dry with too many cops - too many dirty cops and a nation in fear! Go unions. I thought he was a liberal? I thought he was intelligent and knew .. oh.. maybe .. SOMETHING about history! How about this - quit screwing us with union garbage - taking MORE from our wages, and create workplace laws that WORK - and governing authorities that FUNCTION! Oh yeah - and he'll increase the minimum wage. Thank goodness for all those businesses paying both theirs and their employees payroll taxes.
Still gonna vote? Then you're a college student with the I.Q. of a squirrel and you're more into what's cool, than what works.
 
Obama will crack down on fraudulent brokers and lenders. He will also make sure homebuyers have honest and complete information about their mortgage options, and he will give a tax credit to all middle-class homeowners.
FACT: Usually, only the middle class can afford to buy homes - so this, again, REALLY dumps on the poor. I wonder, how a democrat who supports welfare, made it this far without his party burning him? Oh yes - honest and complete information about mortgage options? I see - so - don't lie, show them that if they don't pay, they're screwed. Um, so - what's different? The government sets the rates and can control it - so DO something right, don't displace the blame!

Create a Universal Mortgage Credit:
Obama will create a 10 percent universal mortgage credit to provide homeowners who do not itemize tax relief. This credit will provide an average of $500 to 10 million homeowners, the majority of whom earn less than $50,000 per year.
FACT: Sounds neat, until you realize the credit of $500 million comes out of other pockets. But, ONLY to those who accept the IRS pre-filled out tax sheet you sign and agree to - not those who seek to itemize their tax relief and not pay exorbitant taxes.
 
Obama will establish a five-star rating system so that every consumer knows the risk involved in every credit card. He also will establish a Credit Card Bill of Rights to stop credit card companies from exploiting consumers with unfair practices.
FACT: Obama doesn't have credit card debt, lest he not say something this stupid. Sorry to be so upset folks, but there's no nice way to say this. So - now, credit card companies have to list the risks... you mean.. all that small writing no one reads and an additional 50 sheets of paper in the mail and 20 minutes on the phone for the operator to read through the fine print? Okay.. pointless.. but whatever. Ah, a bill of rights.. .let's see that work!
 
Establish a Credit Card Bill of Rights to Protect Consumers: Obama will create a Credit Card Bill of Rights to protect consumers. The Obama plan will:
  • Ban Unilateral Changes
  • Apply Interest Rate Increases Only to Future Debt
  • Prohibit Interest on Fees
  • Prohibit "Universal Defaults"
  • Require Prompt and Fair Crediting of Cardholder Payments
FACT: This is the FIRST good thing I've read. Unfortunately, it doesn't cap the ceiling on interest which will now increase - thus the laws on disclosure. See how that works? At least there's no interest on fees... only the money you owe - so expect that to be higher. It wasn't that issue which was hurting the people in the first place, it was the fees. This no longer seems to be so awesome, but still - decent.
 
Cap Outlandish Interest Rates on Payday Loans and Improve Disclosure: Obama supports extending a 36 percent interest cap to all Americans. Obama will require lenders to provide clear and simplified information about loan fees, payments and penalties, which is why he'll require lenders to provide this information during the application process.
FACT: Inclusive in this is a plan to stop all those unscrupulous lenders that lead to bankruptcy. Thank goodness 36% is the cap - cause, after all, owing $100 bucks means I only owe an additional $36, the first month. Then the next. Then the next. - um, somehow - at a $200,000 home loan - this doesn't seem to belong in the bankruptcy assitance programs but the 'another way to help business and take from the people' section!
 
Obama will double funding for after-school programs, expand the Family Medical Leave Act, provide low-income families with a refundable tax credit to help with their child-care expenses, and encourage flexible work schedules.
FACT: We need it, we have it, we have it, and it exists. Hmm... wow - this was.. pointless?
 
In conclusion:
Complain about the rich and how Bush did nothing about their tax breaks - and then do nothing as well. Get upset and give the middle class more tax breaks to make it more 'fair.' DON'T do anything for the poor, because we need money to keep coming in from somewhere. Increase jobs and spending (and thus taxation for everyone), but make it for only an elite group. Encourage more honesty in lending by spending MORE billions of dollars of tax money, but do nothing to assist with lending or housing using that same money. Encourage unions, higher wages, more time off, but somehow make this equate to businesses being able to afford it with 'tax cuts.'
 
Essentially - he's acting half Republican, but screwing it up by being a Democrat - and we see why bi-partisan matters should be handled by two, separate parties, not one idiot... er, um, person! His goals are as realistic and effective as the term 'quality television....!'
 
Next article: Education. He has a lot of good ideas, has addressed failures in the previous programs (like no child left behind) - but are these goals realistic?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop, Obama Time! The Changer!

Onto article two of Stop, Obama time! Where I (through assistance thanks to our wonderful system) will list some very interesting issues regarding our Presidential hopeful.... and without further ado, let us take a deep look into how Barack Obama will change this country for the better starting with health care:
 
Here is an excerpt from Barack's speech in Iowa in May of this year:
“We now face an opportunity — and an obligation — to turn the page on the failed politics of yesterday's health care debates… My plan begins by covering every American. If you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is the amount of money you will spend on premiums. That will be less. If you are one of the 45 million Americans who don't have health insurance, you will have it after this plan becomes law. No one will be turned away because of a preexisting condition or illness.”
 
And, how does the great and powerful Wizard of Oz.. er, um, Mr. Obama plan to effect these changes? Let's see:
 
Guaranteed eligibility. No American will be turned away from any insurance plan because of illness or pre-existing conditions.
FACT - most employer paid or partially funded insurance packages do not suffer from the pre-existing illness issue. It is those who must get insurance privately that suffer. And, the truth is - they are usually not turned away. The prices are jacked up and they can't afford it. So - did Obama offer ANYTHING in this little diddy about any functional reform? No, not at all.
 
Comprehensive benefits. The benefit package will be similar to that offered through Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), the plan members of Congress have. The plan will cover all essential medical services, including preventive, maternity and mental health care.
FACT: The same plan Congress has? Does that means that premiums can expect to jump about a 1000%? And, most health care programs do focus on preventative care and are almost always stipulated for care for maternity that's not already government funded. As to mental health care - the truth is - Obama will offer no more than what exists now. Those who really need it, still won't get it, because mental health care has never been cheap, and never will be.
 
Affordable premiums, co-pays and deductibles.
FACT: Ahh... the easy thing to say, isn't it? Didn't someone say this at least 20, 30 or more years ago? In an article I recently wrote about the fictitiousness of Free America, one of the topics covered was advertising driven media. In my article, I quoted another who wrote: Since 1997 when the FDA opened the door to prescription drug advertising to consumers, prescription drugs went up in price 200% to 1000% to pay for it. Non-prescription drugs went up with them. They get away with it because industry public relations claims, and we accept, that giant profits are needed to "develop new drugs."
Hmm, so - what happens to those who need life saving drugs and can't afford it? Well, they die. So - affordable premiums, and yet Obama doesn't even address what is massively contributing to driving up the prices. Wonder how that works?
 
Subsidies. Individuals and families who do not qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP but still need financial assistance will receive an income-related federal subsidy to buy into the new public plan or purchase a private health care plan.
FACT: So, essentially what we're saying here is.... welfare? Okay - makes sense. But, those who don't qualify for the other plans. So, they have to meet a certain set of qualifications - but which ones and how 'real,' will this be to the masses?
 
Simplified paperwork and reined in health costs. / Easy enrollment. The new public plan will be simple to enroll in and provide ready access to coverage.
FACT: HAHAHAHAHA - everytime the government writes something like 'simplified,' it usually means that they're cutting out everything that could have benefitted you, or that it won't happen in this lifetime. Providing easy access to coverage is a government-based standard that's been around for 30 years or so. For example, if there's a doctor within, say, 2 or 3... hundred miles of you, you can certainly reach them in one day and get back. That's easy access; if you have a car; if you can afford the gas; et. al.?
 
Portability and choice. Participants in the new public plan and the National Health Insurance Exchange will be able to move from job to job without changing or jeopardizing their health care coverage.
FACT: Those in the new, 'public plan,' or those in the National Health Insurance Exchange,' will benefit. Those who chose the private option because the others sucked or were ineffective, too bad. Those who move from a job to.. no job... also - wonder if they'll even see COBRA type insurance plans exist anymore? This is getting better, isn't it?
 
Quality and efficiency. Participating insurance companies in the new public program will be required to report data to ensure that standards for quality, health information technology and administration are being met.
FACT: This does NOT lower costs. This creates added paperwork, time and cost. I wonder if Obama actually plans things out or just writes ideas sporadically as they come to him? Let's see, which insurance company is going to write that the doctors are doing a bad job? Hmm... none come to mind. Which doctors' offices or insurance companies are not already swamped under paperwork... wow, except for the kinds of multi-billionaire level docs that good ol' Obama gets, I just can't think of any. So a change? Yes. For the good - so far, NO!

Employer Contribution:
Employers that do not offer or make a meaningful contribution to the cost of quality health coverage for their employees will be required to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of the national plan. Small businesses will be exempt from this requirement, and will receive a new Small Business Health Tax Credit that helps reduce health care costs for small businesses.
FACT: If this doesn't scare the living bajeebers out of you, you're either too rich, too dumb or flat out not reading this! First off - let's think about 'large,' employers, such as Walmart, that are so cheap they overwork their employees illegally. When this law hits - many of these stores and/or their growth, will cease. Those individuals that are poor and need walmart's services, such as its pharmacy, will pay the price. But, let's REALLY read this, shall we? Notice that employers who do NOT contribute a meaninful share, will do so out of their PAYROLL. I don't know about you folks, but somehow, it seems to me, that if I was a big business owner, I'd just stop contributing a meaninful share and then forcibly take the money out of everyone's wages to contribute my share - forcing them all to make less and PAY FOR THEIR OWN HEALTH CARE. This is NOT a mistake. This is NOT an accident. This is in direct support of big business. Holy cow - this is NOT Democratic, but Republican in its underlying nature, although severly hampered by unscrupulous principals. Glad Obama DOES state SOME of what he intends to do. That way, when people who voted for him are getting screwed, we can go back and tell them how STUPID they are and that they CAN'T complain because he told us in the beginning he was planning on causing this type of havoc.
But wait - there's more! The little guy won't suffer this indignity. Oh no, employers who just can't afford it won't be forced to have to take away from their employees earnings to force them into it. The government will do it FOR them. This small business tax credit - guess what, that's less taxes, and it has to be compensated somewhere. No - the cost of the health care doesn't decrease, but their income increases, but now they have to dish that out into health insurance anyway. And, everyone is still forced onto the same system. But wait - it gets better! When taxes have to be compensated for, others will have to pick up the slack. So the employees of big business that just got their paychecks reamed, will have to start paying.... yup - MORE TAXES!
MAN - I LOVE THIS GUY! He is the exemplification of the very strategy designed to destroy a nation, but look so good doing it, that NOBODY notices until it's too late! How awesome is that? The Liberals - the 'for the people,' people, are strategically targeting the people and the economy for a fall.

Mandatory Coverage of Children: Obama will require that all children have health care coverage. Obama will expand the number of options for young adults to get coverage, including allowing young people up to age 25 to continue coverage through their parents' plans.
FACT: All health care plans (well, okay, almost all), offer child health care coverage. The reason kids are not covered - NOBODY can afford it! Let's see - $85 per month for you.... $95 per month for your spouse, and.. oh yeah, $250 per child!!??? But now - it's required? How does that work? Do states start saving money by not making mandatory coverage for children while parents are forced to dish out this $250, lest DHS/CPS step in and take their children away for being bad parents? This is not only bad people - it's (insert HUGE explitives here) dangerous! Who is this man? Satan's hand puppet? And, allowing children up to age 25 for coverage through their parents? Well thank GOODNESS he clarified that. Cause currently, it's children who are still enrolled in school. Now little jimmy can drop out, live off of mom and dad until he's 25 and get all that health care coverage he won't need until mom and dad finally kick him out and he's unhealthy for spending 24/7 playing VIDEO GAMES! Personally - it seemed dangerous to begin with to have a president with such young children (putting family first is important in my book - but as President, you can't; yet, putting Presidency first as an obligation, hurts families and lowers any respect anyone could have for him). But, it's even more dangerous when the man has the foresight of a bat with a blindfold on that's heading toward a big rock and can't use sonar!!

Expansion Of Medicaid and SCHIP:
Obama will expand eligibility for the Medicaid and SCHIP programs and ensure that these programs continue to serve their critical safety net function.
FACT: Yes, expansion of these programs is what we need, because people who need them like the retired and disabled are not getting the services they need like affordable prescriptions or health care.. wait.. that's NOT what he said. He said: eligibility. Oh, I see, the same screwed up plan, just a lot more people to screw with it! Awesome!
 
Reducing Costs of Catastrophic Illnesses for Employers and Their Employees: Catastrophic health expenditures account for a high percentage of medical expenses for private insurers. The Obama plan would reimburse employer health plans for a portion of the catastrophic costs they incur above a threshold if they guarantee such savings are used to reduce the cost of workers' premiums.
FACT: Let's get this straight - employers who now contribute so little that they can dock the wages of their employees to cover the difference, will get reimbursed (in this case - free money to the business as they aren't the ones putting it out) for a 'catastrophic cost' that goes beyond the insured amount ONLY IF, that added amount will reduce the cost of the portion the worker's pay. Okay - let's see: I, the business owner contribute $25 per month (versus the $100 I used too! HAHAHAHA), and now deduct an added $75 from payroll - no specific employee - per person to cover that amount (while the employees currently pay their own $50 premium), but the injured employee is suing for an added $50k above and beyond the coverage limits set for them - I have two choices. I can A) Now have to pay more and further hurt my employees payroll my taking more from payroll to have higher coverage, or B) I can take the Obama Plan $10k they'll reimburse, pocket $5k, use $5k to tell the employees I'm lowering their premium by $5 per month (so now they only pay $45), but because of the lawsuit, the $40k and the bottom line, I can no longer contribute the full $25 I was before and can only contribute $15, so I'll have to deduct payroll an added $10 per person to compensate.
Man -oh - man - okay, quick poll: how many of you 'obama' supporters just woke up and realized you weren't laying in a field of poppies over the rainbow, but in the big pile of doggy doo that's building up around you? Just wondering.. show of hands.. come on now - don't be afraid...
 
Support disease management programs. Seventy five percent of total health care dollars are spent on patients with one or more chronic conditions, such as diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure. Obama will require that providers that participate in the new public plan, Medicare or the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) utilize proven disease management programs. This will improve quality of care, give doctors better information and lower costs.
FACT: Mr. Obama says... spend more money on equipment that doesn't necessarily work but is now required of you because we don't give a darn about actually trying to cure conditions like diabetes or heart disease. Now, Mr. Obama says, only those insurance companies that want to be cut costs by forcing health care into a vacuum tube that doesn't work and screw people but raise your bottom line, jump in on these new national programs. Now, provide better services for the currently, government subsidized individuals who aren't employed, are disabled or can't afford health care and don't qualify for the Obama Plan support through businesses.... oooohhh.. obama didn't say! No fixing the REAL underlying situation of lack of money for REAL services via government funding for you poor dolts!
 
Require full transparency about quality and costs. Obama will require hospitals and providers to collect and publicly report measures of health care costs and quality, including data on preventable medical errors, nurse staffing ratios, hospital-acquired infections, and disparities in care. Health plans will also be required to disclose the percentage of premiums that go to patient care as opposed to administrative costs.
FACT: Yes - do JUST as the government does. Tell us everything. Come on now, be honest. How many of you big, bad doctors are really providing poor quality to your patients? Tell us how you're inadequately providing services to those with health care. Tell us all the mistakes you personally make, not the mistakes because the system's screwed up. Also, we want to know if you deserve less staff and are screwing up the care of your patients. Also - JUST like the government, our model of absolution and truth, we EXPECT those of you in charge to show us, honestly, that you're not stacking paper to the ceiling while the clinic itself is hurting. Especially you insurance companies. After all - we KNOW how honest you are...
 
Align incentives for excellence. Both public and private insurers tend to pay providers based on the volume of services provided, rather than the quality or effectiveness of care. Providers who see patients enrolled in the new public plan, the National Health Insurance Exchange, Medicare and FEHBP will be rewarded for achieving performance thresholds on outcome measures.
FACT: YES! You no longer have to make services available to as many people as possible through the public... health... care... plan? What? Okay, um, you just have to show that you're doing a good job... at... it, and we'll give you.. more.. of... our... tax... money? HUH? I'm sorry, did I miss something? I thought Biden said that Mr. Obama was one of the 'clean,' black people, not one of the heavy pot smokers that gets high before making decisions. Oops - that was egregious- my bad. I apologize. Mr. Obama made a perfectly, um, somewhat, um, kinda... logical decision here?
 
Comparative effectiveness research. Obama will establish an independent institute to guide reviews and research on comparative effectiveness, so that Americans and their doctors will have the accurate and objective information they need to make the best decisions for their health and well-being.
FACT: Obama cares. He cares SO much, that he's going to take OUR tax money, create an institute that will mandate additional government spending on the effectiveness of research - no, don't be silly, not government money to actually help people or perform research, or look at it - so that we are told what we will and will not get. Wait! Hold on! I thought Mr. Obama was a liberal? I thought he believed in less government intervention into the private lives and practices of our people and economy? How is it - that the government will now GUIDE reviews and research? Doesn't that mean that they can pick and choose as they want, and there will be no governing authority over them? Doesn't that mean that pharmaceuticals like Phizer, with a bad rep for eating smaller suppliers and potentially (this is only heresay folks) contributing to the FDA who monitors the drugs they issue, will be able to, for instance, be on the favorable side of an opinion of some person who can now declare that only Phizers' way is right - and they can jack the meds and corner the market? Isn't this the foundation of Capitalism and an Empire? Wow, maybe I'm just reading it wrong. Guide the research on what works best and what will be done - hmmm - somehow, I can't see any other way to read that.
 
Tackle disparities in health care. Obama will tackle the root causes of health disparities by addressing differences in access to health coverage and promoting prevention and public health, both of which play a major role in addressing disparities. He will also challenge the medical system to eliminate inequities in health care through quality measurement and reporting, implementation of effective interventions such as patient navigation programs, and diversification of the health workforce.
FACT: Ahh, here we go - let's rewrite this to be more accurate: New laws governing smoking, drinking, driving, living, breathing, eating and more of our personal lives. And, no more lying for those health care providers. Now they will have to report their statistics and be honest. Cause, when they harm people, we KNOW, that they always tell the truth. Of course, now it will be a WHOLE lot easier for them to avoid some silly, government trap, because patient navigation programs will tell the patients what they will do, eat, sleep, tests they'll be subjected to, added visits with added co-pay and transportation costs and... what's this? Diversification of the health workforce? Um, maybe I'm wrong, but as far as I could tell, doctors come in all shapes, sizes, colors, sexes and more. Does this mean that the Obama plan actually has an underlying, hidden message that will force the health workforce to remove its qualified people and lower its standards? Well - at least we're being more fair in equality, even if those lowered standards mean more people die.....
WHO IS THIS NUTBALL?
 
Insurance reform. Obama will strengthen antitrust laws to prevent insurers from overcharging physicians for their malpractice insurance and will promote new models for addressing errors that improve patient safety, strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and reduce the need for malpractice suits.
FACT: Ah, so less cost for malpractice insurance. So - the insurance companies get an out and doctors will be directly screwed more often. I suppose that holds them accountable. Of course, in law-suits and the current justice system, the doc didn't REALLY have to do anything wrong. After all - everyone's honest, aren't they? But, of course, we'll promote patient safety - and in doing so - with added forms, disclaimers and effective intervention into the doctor's ability to do their job, this will most definately strengthen that doc-client relationship! No need for malpractice suits now! Wait... does that mean new stipulations on what qualifies for those suits? Maybe - this will be less cost to insurance companies, more risk for doctors, and even higher risk for patients. Cool! That's the way to win 'em over. Screw their wages, their health care and THEN - screw up the doctors. This is getting AWESOME!

Lowering Costs Through Investment in Electronic Health Information Technology Systems:
Most medical records are still stored on paper, which makes it hard to coordinate care, measure quality or reduce medical errors and which costs twice as much as electronic claims. Obama will invest $10 billion a year over the next five years to move the U.S. health care system to broad adoption of standards-based electronic health information systems, including electronic health records, and will phase in requirements for full implementation of health IT. Obama will ensure that patients' privacy is protected.
FACT: Obama loves people and is dedicated to their privacy. Therefore, he's going to jack the costs to the clinics and hospitals, dramatically re-route any IT they have in place, dampen the need to have paper records and back-ups by dramatically increasing IT costs (and thank goodness, we ALL know just how RELIABLE the computer industry really is), and keep it all under HIS watchful care by the U.S. government. Of course, to those cynics who think this is a conspiracy to get around making laws that open up medical records to courts and governments to continue the assault on the American Public by corrupted law enforcement, I can assure you: it's.. um.. well... Obama can assure you, that HE will personally protect your privacy. Nobody but you, your doctor, and the U.S. government will have control of your records. Whew! Wipe that drop of sweat from your brow. After all, a simple search at the DOJ / FBI / CERT, regarding computer security will show you that the FBI has been breaking the law, repeatedly, anyway, and getting access to records that they are getting away with or later having to apologize for and are only hacked about 1 million or so times per year. That's ONLY, 1 MILLION opportunities for the hackers to steal your records. What.. could... go.... wrong? At least you won't have to worry about law enforcement breaking the law to illegally take your medical records. Now - they'll have unlimited access. Oh yeah - and notice the $10 billion. How come we didn't get an amount anywhere else? I suppose that he didn't want us to see the measley $1 million being used for a part of the Obama plan that's to help cover the ENTIRE NATION!!??

Lowering Costs by Increasing Competition in the Insurance and Drug Markets: The insurance business today is dominated by a small group of large companies that has been gobbling up their rivals. There have been over 400 health care mergers in the last 10 years, and just two companies dominate a full third of the national market. These changes were supposed to make the industry more efficient, but instead premiums have skyrocketed by over 87 percent.
FACT: Yes, government support of big business pharmaceuticals and the FDA taking bribes (although - that's only heresay because they were donations), will no longer be an issue. Pharmaceuticals will have to give up that power to the little guys. This will FORCE them to lower their prices. On the other hand, the first time the government got involved, they screwed it all up. Now, instead of addressing the other mistakes the government made and taking responsibility for it, like allowing the public advertising of drugs that drove the market up 800%, they're going to make the pharmaceuticals accountable, just like they did with AT&T. That worked WONDERS... didn't it?
 
Barack Obama will prevent companies from abusing their monopoly power through unjustified price increases. His plan will force insurers to pay out a reasonable share of their premiums for patient care instead of keeping exorbitant amounts for profits and administration. His new National Health Exchange will help increase competition by insurers.
FACT: Yes, those insurers that join in this national program [only], will no longer be money making mongers, they will become insurers that pay out of the premiums to the doctors! This should lower premiums! This should make things better! Of course... it will be somewhat "funny," (and I use that term loosely), when the insurance companies then INCREASE the premiums to continue pocketing what they want and insurance will become unaffordable. Wow. It's one thing to make open ended decisions that have possibilities. It's an entirely different matter to back yourself into a wall that will actually HURT the masses.
 
Lower prescription drug costs. The second-fastest growing type of health expenses is prescription drugs. Pharmaceutical companies are selling the exact same drugs in Europe and Canada but charging Americans more than double the price. Obama will allow Americans to buy their medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and prices are lower outside the U.S. Obama will also repeal the ban that prevents the government from negotiating with drug companies, which could result in savings as high as $30 billion. Finally, Obama will work to increase the use of generic drugs in Medicare, Medicaid, and FEHBP and prohibit big name drug companies from keeping generics out of markets.
FACT: Didn't I say that it was the stupidity of government intervention that drove prescription prices upwards of 800%? Isn't it also true that European and Canadian markets don't suffer the same thing because of a highly-reduced, advertising-driven media vs. government/public funded media? But, of course, now WE can buy our medications from other countries. Thank goodness he invented that - just like Dan Quayle invented the internet! But, instead of the current system that lets us do that, the drugs will suddenly become inaccessible due to 'safety,' and the element of pricing. I guess, that really does hurt those folks who don't have insurance and can't afford the high-cost of drugs, because for them - they don't "fit," into the perfect, Obama Plan. However, Obama will no longer prevent the government from also taking part of the lowered prescription drug cost program - just like they did in Oregon. And oh, how it's benefitted SO many people with higher taxes, a limited range of available drugs and a whole, whopping, 10% savings over the stores! Wowweee! Thank goodness for that generic drug market now. After all, that was SO foreign to us... but I wonder... oft times we don't see a generic version of a drug because one doesn't exist. Hmm... I suppose it looked good on paper when he wrote it, but in reality - it means nothing. Guess that's not much different from everything else he's saying.. now is it?
 
That's all for now. Stay tuned for the next installment of: Stop, Obama Time! This time, we'll address Obama's miracle cure for the economy. This time, we'll show how this strong-willed liberal has full support of his party because he believes in:
 
Tax cuts for the wealthy, not those middle class losers!
 
Think he really didn't say this? HAHAHAHAHA - stay tuned believers!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »