About Me

Name: CyberMom
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

How the media drives us with lies - pt1

Sure, I know what you're thinking - "Hey, I came here to learn about the truth of the government, not to hear conspiracy theories about the media!" But, what if.... I mean.... just - "what if" - a good portion of the government's lies and corruption include driving the media and leading us down the primrose path? Well, I mean - that's just insane - right? The media never lies. They never make mistakes. They're ALWAYS fair and balanced, aren't they?

Okay, fine, let's dispense with the idiotic mentality that we don't know that this is happening and get down to brass tacks, shall we? The commercial came on from the government sponsored 'protecting kids' campaign against 'online dangers.' Let me first repeat for you EXACTLY, ver batim, what the commercial states:

"You try to protect them. You want to keep them safe. You monitor what they watch. You set filters to control their content. But, are they really safe? ....... But, the truth is, you can't control your kids' exposure to sex, but you can control how they behave."

For those who MISSED it - let me point out the MAJOR areas of concern:

1. You - the parent, the role model, the guardian, the protector, the guidance counselor, the loved one, the creator, the provider - YOU - have NO control at all - YOU CAN NOT control YOUR CHILDS exposure to SEX because YOU can't stop the media - the ones broadcasting this commercial - from putting sex in front of them. YOU can't stop the abuse of the internet where idiots whose evolutionary basis for sex starts and stops at monkeys will post sex. YOU can't stop the kids at school from talking about it. YOU can't stop your own child's self-driven interest in it (aka their evolutionary development as you are NOT God).

2. But, you can control their behavior.

WHAT? Did I, um, miss something? Let me try this one on you: "Hey little Joey, I want you to say yes and no, sir and ma'am, thank you and please, never talk out of turn, always do your homework, do your chores, listen to every word I say, do as I say not as I do and behave...... But, what happens if they don't? Didn't the TV tell you that you could "control" their behavior? Oh, that's right - because the media is GOING to BLAST sex ALL OVER EVERY show they watch, every commercial they hear and do it so repeatedly that its effectiveness rivals hypnotherapy and subliminal messaging - you CAN'T control them. So, um, why... did the TV... tell me I could?

Because, in the face of Congressional laws coming out such as the "forced" community service, Congress wants to empower you to do as they say. You see - THEY CONTROL YOU. YOU - do not even control yourself. They DON'T need your vote. They DON'T need your approval. What they want - is your OBEDIENCE. But, you argue and say - "no, I'm NOT an idiot, I'm NOT your slave, this is a FREE country and I EXPECT the DEMOCRATIC process to allow me to put in my vote."

Now there's conflict. A resolution is needed. Congress says, "Well, we 'do' represent the desires of the people and we 'should' do what they want, but - naaaahhhhh - why do that? Let's scare them, weaken them, take away their power, screw with their heads - and when they're helpless - let's hit 'em below the belt!" You see, for those of you without children, let me 'splain.... no, wait, let me sum up (what movie? c'mon... you know which one 80's generation.. hahahaha):

We love our kids. We live in fear because we KNOW there are bad people out there, the police and court systems are inneffective and we don't want them hurt. Why? WE WENT THROUGH IT. The parents who are ignorant of what their kids are doing - didn't go through the hardships. WE KNOW. We do NOT want them to grow up. We want something DIFFERENT for them. We want a life of happiness and joy and one that doesn't involve strife and heartache. But, that's not always possible. We know that. And, we know that the media is just getting worse - and worse - and worse. I took my son to see a PG movie - and boy oh boy - what they get away with in PG movies is FAR more than I EVER wanted him to see. Learned my lesson.... And, what does the government do? They ENCOURAGE sex in media. The FCC throws a temper tantrum because Janet Jackson had a 'portion' of her COVERED boob pop out during the super bowl half-time because 'families' were watching - but.... it's okay to them that many of today's cartoons include kissing, sexual scenes, sexual jokes and the music videos that ALL the kids are watching include 'pimpin' the ho's' and the degraded value of idols such as Spears and Lohan.

Right, makes a TON of sense, right? I mean, why not let the SOURCES of the MAJORITY of children's media input include bare butts, skimpy outfits, pimped out sluts, superficial make-up jobs to attract sex, but SLAM down those FAMILY values because... oops... it happened at the Super Bowl in front of everyone? The answer's simple - mom and dad saw. They saw what the FCC was putting in front of their children. Anyone watching this season of South Park knows EXACTLY what I'm talking about. Only when mom and dad become aware does the FCC lay the SMACK down on anyone.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How the media drives us with lies - pt2

 (continued on from "How the media drives us with lies - pt. 1) -
 
Let's examine this in some detail, shall we? Quiznos Subs - their commercial "Dave, put it in me," as the guy looks down at his crotch and says, "Nuh-uh, I burn." Um, maybe in ANY other context, I might have laughed. Sure, I've got the 13 year old mentality that finds fart and sex jokes funny - I'm a guy - EVERY guy (even those who pretend otherwise) - has this mentality by nature. But, it wasn't. Why? For two reasons -
1. IT IS A SUBWAY SANDWHICH COMMERCIAL BROADCAST ON CARTOON NETWORK - THIS is in front of OUR children??? Dammit! My son's not so stupid to have caught the theme of it. They weren't even subtle about it! Sex and subway sandwhiches... gosh.... sex hasn't PERMEATED EVERY SINGLE FACET of hollywood, has it? But - the truth is - not even that was what REALLY peeved me -
2. The OVEN WAS A DUDE. They did NOT use a female voice for the sticking in of the 'torpedo,' sub, into its REAR entry. For anyone who missed it - go look it up yourself, 'cause I'm not gonna encourage it.
 
Is that to say that the subtelty of the absolutely GAY reference was wrong because it was a 'gay' reference? No. In fact, I'm not even sure that the company advertising for Quiznos thought it through. Hell - they STARTED with DEAD hamsters, modifying an existing internet song for their advertising career. What I am peeved about, is that THIS is the VERY issue I FIRST started with - the MEDIA - the people BROADCASTING THIS COMMERCIAL - are the SAME ONES - that told us we 'love our children, and because we do, if we WANT to be GOOD parents, we'll try to keep them away from sexual themes - but..... too bad, we can't.' And, why not? BECAUSE HERE IT IS - on the VERY channel my son watches, right in front of him. Not only is the sexual theme blatant, but the subtle theme is grotesquely exaggerated.
 
Now, in contrast, I absolutely LOVE the Burger King mini-burger commercial because the idea of a horde of hot, playboy-type chicks crowding around me, giving me full attention is actually kind of - cool. Of course, because I'm NOT an idiot and I know that no matter HOW many times I unwrap those mini burgers, women aren't going to flood around me - I try to find the 'subtle' hint - since SEX is the NON-subtle hint. And, survey says: Even overweight, fast-food eating, can't hook up with playboy models because they're not rich and sexy guys can get the rich chicks - they just gotta do what the commercial says. So - what does that do for kids? It LOWERS their standards. And, what's the problem? (and I quote) "You can't control your kids' exposure to sex." Well, not only that - but I am now faced with their lowered standards of what's beautiful, what the easy road promises (but in truth can never produce), and I, the parent - become the liar. SO HOW IS IT I CAN "CONTROL" their behavior?
 
Well - next comes the 'Osbournes' variety hour. No, that's not going to be the full representation of the degraded mentality and unevolved state of humanity, is it? Then what else? Another reality show that relies on the completely 'unrealistic' to survive? Bill Cosby's show in the 80's is considered one of the defining elements of the current troubled condition of the America Family based on media input:
 
The quick fix doesn't work.
 
Mom and dad fight, and in 30 minutes, are they back, kissing and everything is okay? Nope. Billy gets in trouble in school and in 30 minutes is it fixed? Nope. Hell - even today on shows like 'House' (albeit I LOVE that show and will otherwise speak no wrong of it): the people who lived in a way that screwed themselves up, at the end of 1 hour - everything's better. Can the kid's go out, get pregnant and do the same? Nope. Media REALLY took us away from the point of morality. And how, why? Here's something I LOVE - HULU!! I give these guys MAJOR props.
 
What do they offer? Cerebral, gelatinisizing shows.
Can you control them? Nahh... what are you gonna do, shut off your TV AND your computer?
What is their goal? An evil plot to destroy the world.
 
That's it. THAT'S IT! Right there - in black and white. It's not Quiznos or BK's openly sexual content that tries not to say the word, "sex," - it ACTUALLY says what they want. TV rots your brain. TV over the Internet rots your brain. And, what would be the eventual goal? World destruction. Simple. To the point. Heck, if our Government was THIS honest - we'd at least ALL be in a better place!! If we were this honest with ourselves - we'd be in a better place. "Hey, I'd say it's nice to see you today, Bill, but that would just be some empty form of flattery based on socially accepted norms, when in fact, I actually hate the way you treat your family, think your arrogant and stuck up and wish I never saw you."
 
But, will we do that? Nope. Why? FEAR. Yes, I actually sit up at night and wonder if Hulu IS really made up of aliens destroying us. Why? Because - that is WHAT they are broadcasting BECAUSE they KNOW we are SO far down the rabbit hole that we can no longer distinguish reality from fiction. We are the sheep that went to the other side, realized the grass WASN'T greener, and are now wandering around aimlessly. We are a greedy, selfish, "thing"-driven population. We DON'T want the truth. If it's given to us, we REJECT it. And, the point of ALL of this?
 
The government knows this. They feed us what they want us to hear. Obama received 100,000 questions to answer on-line? C'mon - let's NOT be stupid. They filtered out 100 MILLION to only 100,000. And, the majority were about legalizing pot? Yeah - SURE they were. The MAJORITY were questioning his budget policies. And, what did he answer?
 
Four. Four out of 100,000 (out of 100 million). Four questions based on "how will you help lower my tuition?" That is CRAP. Sorry for the foul language - but the truth is - his 'people' chose questions about 'children' to gain public support. It was a media campaign to get the public to like him because 'he cares about the kiddies.'
 
Yeah - but he can't stop their exposure to sex, right? Nope - but he can tell you that you can control their behavior, right? Sure - so long as Congress has a SLEW of pre-determined bills sitting on their desks that they will pass, one at a time, slowly, that will place GREATER control on us. And, they KNOW better than to start with the adults. While the majority of America's made up of the gooey-mush brained television watchers, there are enough people (aka Glenn Beck) who will talk about the truth and raise Cain. So, let's do what the Nazi's did - go after the kids. The kids are easy targets. FORCE parents to believe they're in control - create a RIFT between the kids and the parents - and you have a nation of children willing to turn in their OWN parents to the Nazi regime...
 
Sound stupid? Maybe... in fact... I HOPE and PRAY that you're right and I'm wrong. Because, folks, it's happened before - and it WILL happen again.
That which is, was once before, and that which will come, already has been. Ecclesiastes.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who watches the watchmen?

No - not the movie. If you came for that - go home. I'm talking about one of the government's REAL watchmen... one of their most dangerous watchment.... The department of human services - child protective services.

Oh.. but they save us... they help all the poor, abused children.

Sure they do. Kind of like bleach will clean your intenstinal track of any impurities (NOTE - DISCLAIMER - DON'T DRINK BLEACH OR YOU'RE A FRAKING IDIOT WHO NEEDED TO BE WORKED OUT OF THE BREEDING CHAIN ANYWAY BECAUSE IT WILL KILL YOU - This is a METAPHOR - for those of you too STUPID - to know the difference). Sure... bleach cleans out every last poison, toxin and impurity your body has. This includes most of your intestines, your stomach and heck, it will even get rid of YOU! Why? Because it WILL kill you. Not "May" or "Could" - it "Will."

Just like DHS/CPS WILL happen to you. Don't think that you're going to be free much longer. (and by much,  I don't mean minutes... just years... duhh!). You see, they are supposedly the "watchmen," who watch over our children, our future and keep us safe. But, when one agency has the authority of the attorney general, the district attorney, default laws that presume guilt and enforce punishment, the authority to order and control the police, and violate every facet of the Constitution - this begs the question - who watches the watchmen? Perhaps, it's the little known, "Office of the Ombudsman?' Yeah - try putting it to the test to see what happens. But, I've decided in this post, rather than waste my time writing endlessly to a mindless crowd (since no one reads.. heee heeee).... I'll let you see it for yourself:
http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid:666600   http://www.dhs.state.or.us/caf/safety_model/faq/comp_safety_assessment.html (see the titled Question:   Can a new case be opened when the only identified safety threat is #16?) http://educate-yourself.org/cn/susandetlefsenupdatesonemilylake20agu05.shtml
 
Would you like to see the full list? It would take approximately 2 days to read all the names - of just the websites validting the ever-growing concern!!
 
And, my case is even worse, because no one will help me. No one will listen, because I'm not a woman, and the suffering hasn't grown severe enough yet to warrant the attention. Media's not interested in the simplified concept of preventative care. Special interest groups don't care about stopping the abuse before it begins - and so - the cycle continues. We are still being crushed and hurt and abused by the watchmen, because no one is watching, only complaining after the fact.
 
I love you my son - always and forever, eternity and beyond - no matter what they do to me - I will always be in your heart!
(written by dd for one who can't)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Child Laundering

 The State of Oregon has been finding ways to force additional Federal Funds than just a recent threat of a Filibuster – Child Laundering

In a recent case with the Department of Human Services involving a child named, "S", a father’s struggle to have his child returned home has turned into a nightmare; but it has also provided him insight to disclose one of Oregon State’s dirty, little secrets. Due to a false allegation made by the State of Oregon and local Law Enforcement in an unrelated matter, DHS took his son and placed him into protective care. There have been no allegations that the father ever hurt or abused his child; nor any evidence presented that he was actually guilty of the crimes alleged by law enforcement, but DHS acted quickly, to ensure that his son, "S" would be, “safe.” That is, they improperly acted months after they began their investigation, leaving "S" with the allegedly, ‘dangerous,’ father, and then in a profit-making scam, abused the ‘Threat of Harm’ clause present in the Oregon laws to legally kidnap his child and give him away, in what is considered a non-abuse-based intervention. They removed a child from his home with the intention of permanently giving him away for profit and didn’t require any evidence of abuse to do so.

The Oregon laws are written to be very obscure for this purpose. There are many parts of the OAR and ORS laws that discuss returning a child to their home, but also returning a child to their parent, as the primary goals of DHS. The difference is that the ‘home,’ would be back with the parent from which they had been taken while the ‘parent,’ could be an absent parent who had abandoned the child years earlier, as was the case with "S", in which the mother abandoned him when he was 1, leaving he and the father alone for many years. These two terms are interchanged freely in the OAR laws without consideration for that distinction. DHS does make one thing clear though: they have now mastered the scheme by which they can legally kidnap for profit. This is not an exaggeration. By using the excuse of a, ‘threat of harm,’ DHS does not have to provide any evidence of a factual nature to a court, only that they believe the threat exists. It is not for a Judge to determine if abuse had occurred, only that DHS has jurisdiction to take a child. In fact, it would appear in many cases that the courts work with DHS to help support the State of Oregon in getting Federal dollars. And, considering Rep. Gordon Smith’s (currently replaced by Jeff Merkley as this article has been updated) recent threat of a filibuster, his failure to assist in these matters makes one fact clear: the State Agencies, starting with the heads of the Oregon Legislature, endorse using children as the shields for their monetary gain. The law, as it applies here is:

419B.506 - Termination upon finding of neglect
The rights of the parent or parents may be terminated as provided in ORS 419B.500 if the court finds that the parent or parents have failed or neglected without reasonable and lawful cause to provide for the basic physical and psychological needs of the child or ward for six months prior to the filing of a petition. In determining such failure or neglect, the court shall disregard any incidental or minimal expressions of concern or support and shall consider but is not limited to one or more of the following:
(1) Failure to provide care or pay a reasonable portion of substitute physical care and maintenance if custody is lodged with others.
(2) Failure to maintain regular visitation or other contact with the child or ward that was designed and implemented in a plan to reunite the child or ward with the parent.
(3) Failure to contact or communicate with the child or ward or with the custodian of the child or ward. In making this determination, the court may disregard incidental visitations, communications or contributions.
[1993 c.33 §141; 1997 c.873 §8; 2003 c.396 §86]
(http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/children/abuse/abuse_neglect.shtml - Abandonment is parental behavior showing an intent to permanently give up all rights and claims to a child - just like the 'ex' did in this case, the DHS gave the child, "S", to....)


Also - to TRULY see the problem for yourself: http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/abuse/publications/children/nrccps_report.pdf:

"This report has emphasized that a major problem in the CAF safety intervention system is the continuing confusion apparent in concepts, definitions, procedures and practice concerned with risk of maltreatment and safety threats. The concept of threat of harm as a category of abuse exists as part of that problem and likely perpetuates it. It is likely in Oregon, as in other places, that threat of harm (as a basis for decision making) is open to multiple interpretations, thus the term allows the worker’s decision-making to become less precise and accountable."


The catch in the Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR’s) that supports DHS doing this is the consistent referral to DHS’ first and foremost responsibility to a child being that they return them to “a” parent. By using this very strategically worded phrase, DHS seemingly fulfills the appearance of attempting to act in the best interest of a child and not to separate healthy, strong families. They manage to extend the Federal benefits they will receive by ‘reuniting,’ that child with an absent parent with whom they had not actually been with and could not technically be returned to; an example of this is:

413-010-0180 Basic Rights of Children in SOSCF's Custody. Each child placed in the legal custody of SOSCF has the following rights:

(7) To be provided services which will reunite the child with his or her own family except when there is clear evidence that the family will not protect the child's welfare;

Now, one might believe that the family in question here is the one in which DHS has removed the child from (as per the line regarding a family not being willing to protect the child’s welfare) the only family they have known. Consider the following:

413-040-0005

(5) "Conditions for return" mean a written statement of the specific behaviors, conditions, or circumstances that must exist within a child's home before a child can safely return and remain in the home with an in-home ongoing safety plan.

Would you believe that the only ‘returning,’ that a child who has been kidnapped from their home that can happen is to return them back to the family from which they were taken? Would you believe that the references to changes in that home would refer to the home from which the child had been harmed in which change would need to occur? You would be wrong if you inferred that from this clause; although it appears as if the Oregon Legislature had that intention when they first wrote the law. Here’s the catch:

413-040-0009

Requirements for Conditions for Return

(2) The conditions for return are documented in the case plan and must describe:

(a) The specific behaviors, conditions, or circumstances that must exist to develop an ongoing safety plan that assures a child's safety, as described in OAR 413-015-0450(2)(b)(A)(i) – (iii), in the home of a parent or legal guardian; and

(b) The actions, services, and time requirements of all participants in the ongoing safety plan in the home of a parent or legal guardian

Are these two sections (413-040- 0005/0009) different or do they pertain to any different situation? Sadly, the answer is no. If you look at the above OAR law, you’ll notice the phrase, “a parent.” This means, that an ‘ongoing,’ safety plan for ensuring a child’s safety to be returned to their home – does NOT mean that a child will be returned to their original home. The ongoing safety plan can be for the absent parent to do nothing more than attend classes that teach them how to keep the child safe from the supposedly, dangerous, other parent. And, DHS’ need to be involved to the point it costs them time and labor, ends with the awarding of custody of the child to the absent parent; and, no consideration at all is given for returning the child to the parent from which they had been kidnapped. (And I will digress on the PAS - parental alienation syndrome - issues which have begun to be more recognized in the last 5 years, that the child is being horrifically subjected to...)

What’s especially frightening about this, is that the laws also state that a child’s best interests are to be considered first, and the least amount of intrusiveness is top priority. The laws recognize that there must be some consistency. Unfortunately, the mechanism by which that consistency exists, doesn’t financially support the government, and will therefore, never happen. DHS does not receive federal dollars, nor any incentive for making any effort to reunite a child with the parent(s) from which they had been taken. You can refer to the report by Senator Nancy Schaefer on the findings from her office into the investigations into DHS operating in Georgia, and the Nation as a whole.

No courtroom hearing that allowed for evidence to be presented by both parties, took place. There was no need for the Constitution of the United States of America, in regards to due process and fair representation, to be upheld in a court of law. In the case of "S", the Judge questioned whether or not DHS had met its obligation to attempt to return the child home, and they "said" they did; but no evidence had to be presented in this matter, only their bogus statement that they felt the falsely, accused parent was just unwilling to try. The OAR laws specifically outline rules to the contrary, but without the parent being allowed fair representation or due process, the Judge made a one-sided ruling; going against every last principal of jurisprudence ever established, regarding the right of both parties to present evidence in full for the Judge to make a fair and impartial decision. In the recent Oregon Child Advocacy Project, in an Amicus Curiae Brief, Professor Leslie Harris shows that there is evidence that courtrooms who act presumptuously and do not consider all the evidence, sufficiency of counsel or the best interests of the children are bound to be more harmful to innocent children than good, and are evidence of failures in the legal system to abide by any of the existing laws of fairness and equality for the families.

In the case of "S", DHS circumvented the father’s rights to present evidence, awarding custody to mother from the custodianship they had lied to obtain. They presented mother with adoption paperwork the day the CPS Caseworker, not the permanency worker, gave her custody (which would go against all OAR and ORS standards for permanency plans, temporary shelter plans and other similar solutions in these types of situations). This allowed the mother to apply for full, legal custody within the Juvenile court system. The father will not have any rights in this matter – whether or not the charges against him in the unrelated matter are ever deemed true or not (and thus, whether or not DHS acted upon a false allegation and destroyed an innocent family because of a lie). Why? Because, "S's" new mom - the absend one who abandoned him, will continue to receive additional funds and monies from the federal government, and DHS will get a bonus for assisting. What DHS did, was to take the child away from his safe and healthy home because of a political structure that encourages law enforcement agents and District Attorney’s offices to help create false allegations against families that allow DHS to get involved. It is an intricately laid out scam that starts at the very top of a State’s, political infrastructure (and there is evidence to prove the Office of the Ombudsmen intentionally ignored this matter).

Because these allegations do not involve any forms of abuse, and cannot actually substantiate any threat of abuse other than to often times rely on inappropriate means such as having bogus psychological evaluations performed by low-end, so-called professionals, DHS has to make sure that a child is transferred from their custody as soon as possible. It is child laundering. Their temporary placement for safety pending the results of a criminal trial to determine the facts, are lost when DHS transfers the matter over to the Juvenile Courts, allowing the dependency case to ‘appear,’ to continue in light of any other pending cases while the custody case can go through without having to be set aside. In fact, in the case of "S’s" father, the Judge in the dependency matter asked the District Attorney why they would not wait until after the findings in the criminal case to make rash decisions. The D.A. claimed that they would, most likely continue forth with a civil hearing on the matter following the results of the criminal case; even if the father was proven, not guilty.

Ask yourself this – if the father can prove that the allegations against him are completely untrue, and DHS took his child based on those allegations, why would they bother with an additional trial, and for what? Then, ask yourself this – what purpose would a civil trial between DHS and the father have in the dependency matter if the parent’s rights had already been terminated and the State had given him away to his mother? It helps to know that the D.A. told the Judge, that they would go forth with a civil trial, even if the father was found innocent, after they had begun to work on the Juvenile case to ensure that the mother would have custody. What appears to be taking place in courtrooms across the country, is that the children are getting pushed through the cracks and the cases washed under the carpets, because the D.A. plans to pursue a criminal case that they have concocted and have therefore become quite proficient at doing so, knowing that they can obscure this child-selling, money-making scheme in the background, behind their money-making scheme to imprison innocent people. One system supports another, and it appears to be a well-oiled, giant machine designed around corrupt politics.

This same type of laundering takes place with money. But, children are not objects. They are not money, and this is America – the idea of laundering a child within the legal system for monetary gain is equivalent to a terrorist act, punishable by life imprisonment, or death. That is, unless you’re DHS or the District Attorney. As Rep. Gordon Smith, along with every other member of the Oregon Legislature were notified of this situation, they had an opportunity to respond. However, as the Representatives in Oregon all rallied behind Rep. Smith’s, filibuster threat, they have proven that they will allow any tragedy to occur in order to increase their profit margin. DHS has been exempt from lying in a court and disobeying a Judge’s, direct orders, while in a different court room, a young lady was berated and threatened for not informing the courts, one time, when she moved residences from a temporary shelter into her mother’s home, for charges that are also bogus.

How much do each of these non-abuse cases yield for the State of Oregon? Last year alone, the 5000 – 6000 children taken in a non-abuse situation, turned over about $12 million dollars …. per month. That number is only reflecting the amount made by the absentee parents and foster families and doesn’t even count the amount given to DHS itself. Now we understand how Representatives such as Gordon Smith, are going to guarantee their money; through abusive, criminal and terrorist actions. The State will continue to support trying criminal cases based on entirely circumstantial evidence, knowing that this means that people can lie and there’s a high probability of the innocent sitting in prison, making Oregon ever wealthier for the rich, while crushing the lives of innocent children to help continue to build their money-making empire well into the future.

What man or woman, can cast their vote, knowing that keeping any of the currently elected officials, means that more innocent children, will die suffer? Oregon’s welfare system received an overall grade in 2007 of “D”. This includes internal departments such as the Child Welfare system receiving an overall “D” grade.  Of the 12,000 children that DHS takes, half of them are based, continuously, year after year, upon the Threat of Harm, without any finding of fact. Psychsexual evaluations that do not meet the industry’s standards are abused by clinicians who may hold a Master’s Degree, but not the clinical, psychologists or psychiatric degree required to actually perform a legitimate test, and the courts allow this.

Of course, to some extent, there must be an excuse for the courts. They are overwhelmed, and when a Judge receives only one side of the evidence, and is instructed by the State that they WILL accept this, then they must act accordingly. The Judges rely on the reports they receive from agencies such as DHS and CASA, to the extent that they know these agencies were designed to protect children. And, when half of the cases coming through their courtrooms involve abused children that are battered or raped, the Judges will get to see that some good does exist within DHS. For this reason, they are shielded from getting to know that more than 20% of those battered, raped and murdered children, are also the victims of foster care that resulted from DHS taking a child from a home where they had never been abused and placing them into a dangerous situation. So, in some situations, the Judges must maintain the right to be exempt from the accusations of corrupt, profiteering off of the innocent.

However, the politicians must not be permitted to be exempt. They choose to represent the people, but their representation includes the blatant abuse of approximately 6000 children every year, and has not improved in over ten years’ time. DHS takes approximately 1.5% of Oregon’s children every year (in a state whose population is slightly less than 4 million people total; and only about 20% of those are children under the age of 14!). DHS claims that they are understaffed and underfunded. Rep. Gordon Smith claims that the Federal Government must begin to contribute more to the State of Oregon. The Oregon welfare system, the education system and other programs that involve children look to be cut once again this year because of underfunding. However, when the yearly, federal dollars given for children that are taken for reasons that do NOT include any form of abuse are around $200 million dollars per year, it raises the question over the potential abuse of Federal dollars.

The issue of protecting children from abuse is a very serious one and should not be taken lightly. There should never be any reason to not use tax dollars on both the State and Federal levels to ensure that children who have been subjected to abuse, are given the right to be protected. What we should be concerned with, is an industry such as DHS, whose entire success and future depends on removing children from what they label as ‘dangerous homes.’ If the Oregon, Department of Human Services were to stop taking children that they only ‘believed,’ to be harmed, than they would have their caseloads reduced to only slightly more than half of what they currently handle. This means that their supposedly strapped budget would also be significantly cut. Permanency workers, such as the one on "S’s" case, handle near 30 children at any given time, and must contribute a significant portion of time to each case. It has already been argued that a teacher in a classroom, whose responsibility starts and stops within the hours of school operation, cannot properly handle that many children; how can we expect a caseworker who’s responsible 24/7 to do the same?

The answer is simple: cut the caseload, by changing the priority status of DHS to managing cases of child abuse. Assessments can be done all day long for alleged child abuse, but cases that do not involve child abuse should never be a part of any case management. That would exceed the scope, reasoning and logic for child welfare. It should further be added, that in cases where evidence has not been established as per the law, that not only should DHS not be permitted to intervene, but that temporary shelter assistance, should remain in effect until such time as a child can be returned to their parent either following the establishments of the facts as untrue, or until such time as the parent can be retrained to get their kids back. Giving a child away, whether it’s to a foster family or an absentee parent, violates the principals of custody cases and individual rights. Doing so without any proof of abuse or legally established facts, violates the entire foundation of due process as included within the Constitution. To do so otherwise, would appear as a malicious, egregious attack on the innocent; especially the children. I wouldn’t suppose that our officials in Congress would do such a thing; so then comes the other fear – money. Let us stop selling our children and start protecting our families, shall we? This is, after all – America.

SOURCES:

http://www.law.uoregon.edu/org/child/docs/dhs.pdf

http://www.law.uoregon.edu/org/child/docs/jenkinsbriefexcerpt.pdf

http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A128226.htm

http://www.knightsindirtyarmour.com/ArrestWarrant.html

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341216.shtml

http://www.nkmr.org/english/the_state_is_the_child_abuser.htm

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/319814.shtml

http://suncanaa.com/2008

http://www.kids-right.org/shame11.htm

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Heartless Giant

There is a giant lurking in the background of our daily lives. It feeds off of the misery of others from its unseen hiding place. We see it every day, but do not recognize it. Our government has spent billions of dollars ensuring that the giant is well hidden, and even more money ensuring that it is well protected should it be exposed. And, like all creatures, this giant must feed. It is far more frightening than any terrorist or war we could ever face, and yet it still hides in our own back yard. If it is not draining the life out of an innocent person, or sometimes an entire family because none are being sacrificed to it, it will stretch out from its hiding place, carefully ensuring it is not seen, and grab hold of the innocent randomly to feed upon them. Unfortunately for those of us who are parents and seek to protect our children, while we may try to fight this beast back, we are no match for its awesome strength and power. And, since anything we’d say or do against it publicly, crying out for help would undo the billions the government is spending to keep the giant hidden, our cries for help go unheard. We contact the media, but they either ignore it because there is not enough money in the story for them to cross such a beast, or because they too, are simply, far too afraid of the giant. In a world where adults must grow up and leave behind fairy tales, legends and mythologies as stories from their past, once you have beheld the face of this giant, your entire foundation of beliefs is shattered. Your understanding of the world, from political conspiracies to everyday life is torn asunder. To look at the giant’s face and see that it is real, but that it is a horrible, grotesque thing woven from the fabric of the most vile parts of human existence is enough to destroy the soul itself.

 I speak, of course, of one of the most powerful organizations in our world: The Department of Human Services. Laugh not, disbelievers. For the story I have to tell is one that will leave you in such fear, that you will never be the same person again. Whilst many ghost stories and spooky tales are spoken around a campfire and carry through our entire lives, this is one ghost story that you never want to find out is true. This is one of those legends, that once you know about it, you can never go back to the state of innocence you possessed prior to reading it. I warn you: if you are weak of heart, then do not continue to read on. Where I thought I could go on and continue my fight against this beast, I have learned of its true power. It’s awesome fierceness is so great, that I fear death less than I do the grip of this monster. And, in truth, have prepared myself for my final days on this world, knowing that my child has been swallowed up by this monster, and without an army of people, money, press and others to support my struggle, he will, day by day, be broken down until there’s nothing left. There is no greater pain, or shame, that could befall a loving father than to have lost his son. This is not a battlefield of glory or honor, but of corruption and deceit. Where I would turn to the government for assistance, I find people ‘shutting,’ me up. Where I would turn to the law for protection, I find the highest levels of authorities quickly, ‘passing the buck,’ hoping not to upset the giant and themselves face its terrifying wrath. There’s an old adage that reads: The only things in life that are certain are death and taxes. While I’m sure the grim reaper doesn’t appreciate being brought down to the same level as the I.R.S., he should be quite thankful that it ends there. Where once the I.R.S. had ultimate authority within their own borders, they too, fear the reprimands that might befall them should the Department of Human Services turn on them. In fact, the I.R.S. will support the misappropriation of federal dollars to support the giant’s decisions and help hire it an army of minions and dark soldiers to do its bidding just to avoid a conflict of interest and be crushed.

 Sure, I know what you’re thinking. All of this sounds like a group of well-placed, misleading adjectives intended to scare you. Look around you though – do you see it? Can you feel it? Can you hear it? The answer you’re telling yourself right now is, ‘no.’ You don’t see DHS anywhere you look. You don’t hear DHS anywhere you go. But, that’s where we begin to break the surface of the greatest cover-up in today's world. Ever hear of, ‘welfare?’ That, is DHS. Ever hear of Social Security Disability? That too, ultimately goes through DHS. Whenever you hear discussions of health care, government supported family events, family planning, disabled services or child protective services, you are hearing of DHS. I’m sure you’ve heard of Medicare and Medicaid? Both, along with all services to the elderly, are a part of DHS. And, while DHS has its hands in everyone of our lives, affecting our tax rates, political campaigns, legislative laws, ballot measures, schools, and a wide-variety of other, daily factors, such as automotive, prescriptions, health care and so on. There are even darker actions this giant is a part of that remains completely unseen by the general public. In fact, it’s so important to the government that you not know one of the giant’s dirty, little secrets, that they have given the giant complete, judicial authority to do as it pleases, even surpassing Congress itself. That’s right, the giant is so big and frightening, that not even Congress or the United States Supreme Court may rule against it. If the giant wants to kill, it can. If the giant wants to hurt, it can. And, if the giant sees you and your family as its next, delicious target, a series of events will take place that will find you in the same place I have recently found myself: waiting for death to come and take away the irreversible pain the giant has wrought upon you and your innocent, loved ones. What’s really frightening though, is that the giant does want to kill, to hurt and to destroy. In fact, without specifically destroying the lives of as many people as possible, the giant cannot survive. DHS is the only organization in the world whose soul requirement to function relies on being able to vindictively hurt another human being. And, when there are not enough ‘bad guys,’ for it to hurt (since the government does at least try to convince the giant to focus on the bad guys, hoping to protect at least a few of the innocents), the giant will turn on the remainder of the population to satisfy its hunger.

 Not scared yet? Not sure what to believe? I was, right where you are now. The difference is, that I didn’t have the luxury of reading this in advance. I had to face the giant head on without warning, and watch as my little boy was drug away in its hands, kicking and screaming for me to save him, pounding with my fists against the soles of shoes so large that I couldn’t even be felt. And, as I watched helplessly, my son screamed, “Daddy, please save me. Please don’t let it get me. Daddy, please help me.” And, I screamed back, “I’m coming son. Hang in there, just a little longer. I promise, I coming!” But, those would be the last of my words he would hear with his ‘own,’ ears. You see, the beast does not feed as humans do. It must be fed with pain and suffering. As I mentioned before, the government has tried to circumvent this abomination, the best it can, by trying to focus the beast’s hunger on criminals and bad guys; but there just weren’t enough of those. In order to help sustain its appetite, and help control this ravenous hunger, the United States government has created initiatives and emergency bills based on fake premises hoping to hide their actions. Most recently, the Adam Walsh Act which was supposedly designed to ensure the protection of children against sexual exploitation and harm. And, yes, it contains clauses that have been determined to directly interfere with the Constitution of The United States; preventing the falsely accussed from getting access to records for forensics without first entering into the Giant's lair. And, there is no premise for either of these issues. The Government acted without proof or reasoning.

It is not an unknown fact to the mass public that when the government wants to gain the support of the people, even when the situation doesn’t support it, that they play upon the public’s, ‘fears.’ When the United States wanted to enter World War II, it was faced with a serious level of opposition from those who remembered World War I, and until the bombing of Pearl Harbor occurred, couldn’t convince the public to support its cause. To save time and space not discussing all they have done, this is one of the best, and most infamous examples of how the government obtains public support. Look at 9-11, and the need for the Republican party to thwart a nation’s dying support of our troops. It certainly did the job it was intended to do. So, in an attempt to ‘protect,’ the people, the President himself has overseen these laws (referring back to the Adam Walsh Act) and agreed to them unquestioned. You may ask yourself why the government would use anti-child predator/anti-pedophile laws to support the giant when there are probably easier, and much less unscrupulous ways? The answer is this: There is a sub-division of DHS called Child Protective Services. This was an agency originally designed to protect children who had been harmed. In the last decade or two, this has been mutated into a grotesque, boil and puss-filled leg of the giant’s. By using the child-safety, protection acts as a front, the government knew that no one would object to the recruitment of law-enforcement officials and accredited, psychologists to also support these ‘goals.’ The problem is, that unless a child is being hurt, CPS has no reason to exist. And, while it is sad that we live in a world where children are hurt, the transmutation of transforming DHS/CPS minions into committing criminal activities, has not functioned to protect those children, but rather give up their original goals to become feeders of the giant. Heck, in the last 10 years, the courts have allowed individuals to repeatedly commit malpractice and falsely represent themselves as doctors during trials. They have allowed laws, such as the OAR laws to be broken and force people to see these so-called, doctors, in lieu of real medical professionals, so they could hide the truth!

 If the giant went completely unchecked and was hurting our children in front of us, the government would not be able to keep it so well hidden. Instead, CPS has been given the agonizing souls of innocent adults to feed from as well. This is not just any adult though, but adults that the government has to ‘set up,’ to ensure that their actions remain hidden behind a wall of lies. It is true, that the general public in this country has become so desensitized to the cries of their peers, that a Capitalist nation has no financial support for the media to show care or concern for adults who are hurt while being falsely accused of crimes against children; that a blind eye is turned toward the situation; and the truth becomes a series of muffled, agonizing screams that will eventually stop once the life is fully bled out of us. The media will not admit their mistakes, because they'd also have to admit that they knowingly ignored the brutal abuse of the innocent. We are all concerned about the safety of our children, as it should be. Why would anyone of us question the government’s motives when we hear about these, ‘monsters,’ the so-called predators and pedophiles who live amongst us? In fact, many ‘soccer-mom,’ types blindly jump onto whatever caravan is passing by them, pointing fingers and screaming ‘witch,’ creating an insanely unacceptable, if not humiliating (to the justice system environment) abuse of the law; whereby the real, underlying issues are further lost and forgotten. Those who read the recent laws about stopping the sexual exploitation of children (not the finger pointing and quite ignorant soccer-mom-type moms and dads of our country who care less for their children than they do championing a cause so they can feel better about themselves), and are not a part of the government’s intricately designed plans to keep the DHS giant hidden, usually find themselves disgusted and appalled. But, they are not disgusted so much with the so-called predators/pedophiles. Instead, those who actually read through these laws and case files such as Matthew Bandy and Julie Amero, usually find themselves shocked and dismayed at the government. In fact, their ever-growing laws are becoming so frighteningly against the basic principals of justice and due process that even criminal attorneys are having a difficult time managing these cases. Based on common-law, English jurisprudence, a person is supposed to be, ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ However, there have been recent laws that have overturned Constitutional Amendments themselves, to punish a person before due process has taken place. For instance, a person accused of seeing child pornography online (which Congress has strangely, without justification or support and against an entire nation of screaming and protesting psychologists, deemed equal to sexually raping a child) who protests the accusations and is awaiting a trial, will be stripped of their privileges to use a computer, go outside at night-time and regardless of whether or not they’re a parent, may even find themselves with the same limitations in their everyday life as a fully-registered, sex offender. The constitution says that a person cannot be punished until found guilty through due process. The law disguises this punishment as ‘conditions,’ of being on bail. Not even murderers or rapists face the same level of limitations as the accused in this case.

 While we should be concerned for our children’s safety from predators and pedophiles, we should be even more concerned about the laws that are identifying predators and pedophiles for the sake of feeding the giant.  If we truly care about our children, can we justify the amount of innocent people being gathered up for the slaughter, when that is what our children see? Should we not start with the most basic principals of human rights and respect? The way the current system works, we are sacrificing our children’s futures and minds for the personal, selfish desire of the here and now. There is no need to provide evidence in these cases. In fact, the ‘smoking gun,’ policy of habeus corpus has been extinguished. This should scare every last person in America. It doesn’t matter if you’re the type of person that believes that your completely legal and above-board actions on the internet should make you exempt from false accusations. But, does that still apply when you can be tried without evidence? You can be tried on an assumption that you were the person to commit the crime because you own a computer. Only now is forensics just starting to recognize this, long after it is too late for tens of thousands who are either in prison for life or have already leapt to their deaths. I won’t go into that more, because that is not the focus of this article. Suffice it to say that in the end, the government has created a series of laws, special sources of additional funding  and taken other measures to ensure that every-day people are being hunted down, increasing the numbers into the tens of thousands in less than a few years’ time of supposedly guilty people, and all without any basic consideration for facts, evidence or whether or not a child has or has not been harmed. Yep, you read that write. You do not have to harm a child to be tried for the harming of a child. Could the situation get more dangerous in a country based on Liberty and Justice? Sure it can. That’s because not only have the police hunted down innocent people; finger-pointing and saying, ‘witch,’ just like they did over 300 years ago become an acceptable form of irrefutable evidence, but none of this is to actually protect children. The main point is to feed the giant. DHS uses psychologically accredited, evaluation institutions to act in unethical standards and find blame where there is none, using tax-payer dollars to support this activity. Their activities feed one another’s lust. DHS needs guilty people, evaluation centers need consistent business. It’s a perfect fit. And, people who have passed lie detector tests and claimed innocent with children who remain unharmed will still find themselves ‘guilty,’ of harming their own children, without due process while their criminal case ensues, now supported by DHS’ very unskilled and unqualified, ‘findings.’ This is where the giant lies. Hidden behind a now, ongoing criminal trial that sits in the public’s view, obscuring what’s happening in the background, where the minions are acting without a court of law, due process or civil liberties. In fact, in every other State or Federal department, when a decision is reached in any situation, the affected person is contacted and given the right to debate the findings. However, DHS does not believe in such a process. The government needs to satisfy the beasts’ hunger right away.

 After these so-called, 'criminals,' are released, they are placed on a sex offender registry list. This isn't a list that is kept by law enforcement officials, but given to the general public. No, it doesn't help them - it empowers them to become ridiculing, cruel bastards. The Constitution ruled out cruel and unusual punishments, and in America such s piblic humiliation- that has been a standard for well over 100 years. The Sex Offender list is more proof that the Government is trying to keep you distracted from the giant!

While DHS may eventually offer an individual the right to contest DHS’s findings (in an effort to keep up appearances and keep the giant hidden), it will be too late. By then, the giant has your child, and either you give up on the one you love, or lie and admit guilt to DHS, taking sex offender classes and get registered as a sex offender, adding to the prosecution’s case against you and getting you sent to prison where you will still lose contact with your beloved, little one [the perverbial rock and a hard spot]. Think this happens only to the guilty? Did I not write before that there just aren’t enough guilty people? While I will write a little later on of the guilty, for now I write of the innocent. Those who are thrust before the giant, helplessly and in pain, but are innocent of the crimes for which they have been accused. The government employs a system I call: The Hungry, Hungry Hippo technique. This technique sets up the police stations to receive additional funding for the more people they bust (trying to fill the giant’s quota). So, like marbles in a game of Hungry, Hungry Hippo, all the white marbles, which look identical represent the innocent and the guilty, and the police are attacking at whatever comes within reach. Sure, they don’t invade any private home they want because that would reveal their actions to the general public. Instead, the F.B.I. and local authorities work to set people up online. They financially back the media, supporting Dateline NBC’s series: To Catch a Predator, Oprah Winfrey’s campaign to stop predators and these mediums allow themselves to be used for money and out of fear. When all else fails, the officers change audio tapes of interviews and provide lies on police reports. But, in their attempts to disguise the giant, the government has actually revealed him to those who sit in the shadows and watch, and would use this knowledge for their own, corrupt desires.

 We call these people, Spyders! They are malicious hackers who do not necessarily live for financial gain, but to cause harm to another. Some intend to purposefully harm others, while there are those, much like terrorists at an airport who might sneak a liquid into your carry-on to avoid taking responsibility should it be discovered, who use your computer for their gain. Out of the 200 million+ adults in America that own computers, over 90% of them live in the belief that either their computer is completely secured, or that they have nothing of value for a hacker to steal anyway. What they don’t know, is that the security they employ may not be enough for someone directly attacking them, or that they do have something of value: the computer itself. While the government is increasing the penalties on those who view child pornography trying to make up the excuse that they just want to stop the child porn industry (hiding their underlying intentions of feeding the giant), they are inadvertently encouraging criminals with mal intent to join in the world of hackers. Where 20 years ago, hackers might have moved into the world of criminal activity, today, it has gone the opposite direction. Who wants to go to prison for 5, consecutive, life-time sentences? Nobody! Especially with the conviction of child rape (referring back to the mix-matched accusations of viewing child pornography being equivalent to making it or raping a child) and the dislike of those people in prison. It is actually easier and safer now, for criminals (much like it is terrorists in an airport) to risk losing the materials they were after or sought to transport, than to be the one accused of acquiring it. Terrorists don’t want to be caught transporting chemicals on airplanes, and that’s why airport security has increased, as has the risk of people actually asking you to carry items for them! Some pedophile, who may have had no interest in computer technology before (beyond the most basic use of it), now finds themselves with a laptop, in a strange neighborhood, hacking into the first open wireless account they see. In fact, many of these people will go to Youtube.com, blackhatproject.com, wardrivers.com and other internet sites to gain the software and minimal knowledge needed to be successful in avoiding detection by setting YOU up. And sure, while the D.A. can’t prove the computer owner committed the crime, the police and authorities, and even the jury, are purposefully kept ignorant of foreign IP addresses, computer hacking and similar activities that locally, wirelessly and remotely allow full access into your computer. Some have even become intelligent enough to create viruses to place pictures in ‘obvious,’ locations on another’s computer to make them appear guilty without a doubt, then self-delete themselves and leave much like a criminal who just shot a man, ran by, handed you the gun, and kept running; and there you stand, holding the smoking gun, in front of a group of cops who are playing a game of Hungry, Hungry Hippo. Why keep running? Why look anywhere else? They got their marble. They’ll just keep shooting until they get another marble.

 Not frightened yet? Are you amongst the many who have become mindless sheep, shrugging your shoulders and saying to yourself that it’s okay, you’re exempt and safe, because this sort of thing happens to only a few, select people? Well, before you get too comfortable, listen quietly to the howl of the wind, the falling run or the beating sun. What do you hear? You hear that the rest of the world is still going on without you. You are not lost in the mix or a celestial body that moves on its own, independent from all else. You too, are sitting at your computer now, reading this, like many others. And, you too are susceptible to the Minion’s ‘traps.’ What are these traps? Well, if the authorities aren’t supposed to wait around for the bad guys to come to them, and there aren’t enough bad guys out there, some of these authorities must answer the call of duty. They must become dark soldiers sent out to play games with your life, and support other, criminal elements in snaring you in their ‘trap.’  So, let’s say a missing parent, aspiring foster parent or just vengeful ex learns about this giant’s existence and decides to spite you with lies. They have learned there is financial gain in such actions, and join the world of Spyders. Ever wonder if you’ve wronged or upset someone who might seek to harm you? In order to help fill the giant’s hunger, the government uses and encourages these people to hurt you while also protecting them. Before you can protest these lies (if you even get that chance since DHS has authority over the State and Federal courts, preventing you from having a trial at all), you suddenly find yourself wrapped up in a criminal case, your child has been taken away in the hands of the beast, you are being followed and hunted by the authorities who guard the beasts’ secrets, and you must watch helplessly as the beast feeds not only upon your child’s pain, but your own as well. DHS/CPS can remove a child from your home, place him/her in foster care or in the home of another biological parent, and you get no say in the matter. You can’t even protest it; even if the other parent threatens to, has or does harm your child. Then, the I.R.S. sees to it that the child’s ‘new’, family gets a couple thousand dollars a month to take on what they consider and have proven with their words and actions an unloved, burden (which is your pride and joy and beloved angel), pays off CPS to ensure the giant is informed of their loyalty, and before you can even scream for someone to help save your child from the beast’s clutches, it is too late. They are now in the custody of a new family. That is to say that they have been swallowed up, and you are in the giant’s grip as it holds onto you, letting you hear your child continue to scream for help, to come home, for the only family they’ve ever known to bring them back. The giant derives pleasure from this. Should you try to fight the giant, the government will ensure that you are thoroughly humiliated, destroyed, financially robbed and emotionally ripped apart. That way, your screams for help are lost to the winds. The government makes sure that unless you can afford to buy it, you get no justice.

 But, there’s hope, isn’t there? While the minions working for the giant are constantly building up the small child’s hopes, telling him that soon the giant will release him and soon he will go home, knowing that the truth is that soon he will be swallowed up completely and all of those built-up dreams and hopes shattered, perhaps the parents can climb up the giant and shout the truth at their child, at least trying to prepare them for what’s about to come. But, no. Of course, we can’t do that. The truth, is not something we want to tell our children. We are forbidden from telling our children anything that might involve ‘adult’ matters. We cannot make promises, because the minions will tell you, that when you make a promise to see your child soon, or that you’re fighting for them to come home, that you are making an empty promise that you cannot fulfill. For those with their cerebral cortex intact and not tightly packed within their sphincter region, we know this to be the minions’ cryptic, yet obvious way of telling the parents that those promises are empty, because DHS, before any trial, prosecution or chance for defense, has deemed you ‘guilty,’ or even, ‘sick in the head,’ by (again) unqualified personnel with unlimited authority. And, it’s the job of these minions (the government identifies them as, ‘caseworkers,’ for DHS/CPS) to do this, increasing the pain that will feed the giant. So, instead, I sneak in, all ninja-style, and quietly hand him a note. It doesn’t bad mouth anyone else, it doesn’t indicate who might be hurting him, but it tells him, get ready son, they’re going to take you away, and I want you to be okay because I may not get to see you again. The note may tell your child to cry out to all who shall listen, talk to your attorney (if you are fool-hearty enough to believe that your child’s court appointed attorney has even met with your child or assigned a caseworker to check on your child’s health), trying to help your child fight, just before the very end. I know that it is something that will make my son sad, but alas, he’s crying out for help, and the minions are telling him, ‘sure, don’t worry, we’ll get you out of here and make everything all better!’ But, when the minions get ahold of the note, all hell breaks loose.

The giant is infuriated, and his other fist comes down upon you full bore, crushing you flat. Does it hurt? Not really. Now that his minions have already cornered you, gleefully laughing and telling you that you shall never see your child again, any pain beyond that is nonexistent. And what’s worse, is that the people you would hope could protect you and your child, the judges and the attorneys, see that you have upset the giant and suddenly run around scared and afraid. The Judges either fall to the authority of the Giant usurping their own, or turn against the parent, scolding them for being harmful toward their child, never questioning why one might tell their child the truth. Would that parent really want to harm their own child whom they’ve loved and nurtured for years and years? Aren’t there a myriad of obvious, other ways that a person can harm or scar a child? Since when does the truth become harmful? Of course, the reality is, that while we are supposed to have a safe-haven for our children, such as DHS (and I will be the first to say, that for 8 years of my own son’s life, until I was confronted with the giant, I believed that DHS was there to help), how is it that our children can ever again be expected to trust DHS/CPS or the authorities, when those people are lying to him and will only prove themselves to be untrustworthy? The minions are, in fact, working against their own cause (in which the truth would have been in their favor, if they indeed sought to actually protect children – thereby solidifying the true intentions of these monsters). They are nothing but mindless slaves, unqualified and unskilled in the field of psychology and are acting as such. Their malicious harming of another stems from their being hired to do a job where they must be hurting someone, or else they have no job. That is the worst type of work that has ever existed in this country, and yet, our own government fears the giant to such extremes, that they support the minions even when they’re purposefully working on hurting a child.

 But, what comes of telling this truth? While our children may profess to the minions (aka. caseworkers) that they love their parents, that their parents would not lie to them and do not make mistakes, DHS/CPS violates its own policies (for about the 100th time by this point in the process) and involves our children in adult matters, seeking to undermine us and cause pain and heartache for the giant to feed on. It’s not enough that the giant may feed on the misery of our children, he must also be fed their parents. Thus, DHS/CPS tells the child (who is still in the grasp of the giant), your parent lied, your parent is bad, your parent made a mistake and adults shouldn’t do that. Adults shouldn’t tell kids to keep secrets. Adults shouldn’t pass notes. And, as soon as your child, who has felt continuously betrayed by these people and has suffered months of indignities, lies and harassment and is terribly confused tries to argue with them, DHS/CPS tells the children they’re wrong and silences them. But, the minions know, the child is not suffering enough. The parent is not suffering enough. The giant is not feeding, and that is counterproductive to their goals. So the minions will bring you forth in chains, stripped and bare, taking away your rights or abilities to even bring your child food when they’re hungry or medicine when they’re sick, (or perhaps offering you the chance to surrender your child’s possessions into their custody, to be used during visitations, so that rather than your child getting to take their own items home with them, must know that DHS/CPS is now in possession of them, and you are the one who gave away their toys, further trying to hurt you in the eyes of your child) and try to force you to yell out to your child that you were wrong, that you are a liar and that you did make a mistake. Oh sure, you can argue this, but DHS/CPS has already done the damage. Even if you say nothing, a small, innocent child has now been forced to question everything he or she has ever known and will suffer even more. By not allowing you to share your emotions such as love or longing for your child in their absence, they are letting your children feel alone, and abandoned. This is the breakdown. It breaks down and shatters the souls of the parents who cry in court rooms and plead to deaf ears for help. It breaks down the children who look to the only source of trust they’ve ever known only to find emptiness where lips have been sealed (unbeknownst to the child that those lips are sealed under the threat that their parent will never get to see them again, even right before they’re lost forever, and unbeknownst to the innocent child that the parent only maintains their silence, not wanting to abandon their child) and become weak and afraid. It is a systematic series of actions that the minions have been trained in, and are hired for. It is the only skill they have; a process of pain and destruction.

 But, what of those who are really hurt by their parents? Is there hope and redemption for them? While many may argue yes, that does not offset the amount of deaths and rapes and permanent emotional scars that have been reaped upon the innocent by those DHS has selected as their ‘extensions,’ to help hide the giant’s presence in the public. There are those children that are probably being helped by a few foster homes, finding a new life, away from dangerous and harmful parents. Those are the stories that DHS ‘hopes,’ they’ll get enough of, in-between the devastation and death they otherwise leave in their wake, using the media to broadcast those stories and keep the giant hidden for a while longer. And while people such as those at Fightcps.com have tried to make the public aware, the only ones who ever find their way to these internet sites that expose the giant and tell the truth are those who are already wronged. Those who have suffered and bled and are bleeding some more, living with the echoes in their heads of their children crying out for help, hoping to make a change. But, does anyone else hear? Can anyone else see what’s going on?

 Certainly not the government. They are far too busy trying to hide the giant. And, because of their own, self-damning laws, they dare not speak out now against the falsely accused, lest they gather the attention of those around them to see what’s really happening. Do the parents who live in fear for their children’s lives hear the truth? I’m afraid, like many other parents who struggle to keep their children safe from predators and pedophiles, I too, did not hear the truth. For all the truths I have known, I had never seen the giant, and yet every day, I was looking straight at it. I could not hear the muffled cries of children, although every day I stood next to them. And, rather than just be shamed, I must be punished. It is selfish of me to have dreamt that I might follow all the rules of the land and obey the authorities blindly and be permitted to be a parent. It is selfish of me to have reveled in the sheer joy that comes from the privilege of loving and protecting my child. It is selfish of me to have wanted to protect him and care for him for the rest of my life. For that, I am proud. I am proud to have been selfish. I am proud to know I protected my son in every way.

But, a dark shadow has already cast out the light, and nothing but the broken, battered soul of a once, proud parent remains. The darkened soul who has seen the giant, looked into its eyes and felt its might upon his head, is all that I have become. Perhaps, if there was a way for all this to be repaired, things could go back to being the same (but never - completely). But, that requires having a bit of secret knowledge that surprisingly, most parents don’t know. Our lives are not linear. We alone, are not whole. For me, my child was the other half of my circle. For me, he completed me and filled in the gaps and struck down the burdens of the world, helping me to see the joy in the simplicities life has to offer. With my circle broken, I am not whole, and am therefore broken inside. Only when my circle is made whole, might that be repaired. And, yet, it would still be darkened, for we would live in fear of the great and mighty giant who lingers in the darkness, constantly aware that the authorities above us are waiting to snatch whomever they can to feed the beast.

 But, these things, will not happen. Have you ever wondered why, an attorney who has a constant retainer of over $10,000 per client (at minimum) and nets around $200,000 per year, will never represent anyone because the cause is just? After all, these folks became criminal defenders because they believed in their cause, right? That’s where we’re wrong. These folks are already well aware of the giant and its minions. They know the lack of knowledge the public have and what their client will be faced with. That’s why they require money up front. They are taking a risk, every time they defend a client, of upsetting the giant. And, they are so afraid of the giant themselves, that their only motivation for taking the risk is the money. If the money’s good enough, in a Capitalist country (which I won’t waste time defining here), any risk is worth the endeavor. But, what of the public defenders? Don’t they care, obviously working a non-profit environment where they are trying to support the innocent? While I hate to be so stereotypical as to rule out those who have, throughout history, shown a sincere concern toward their duty, shall we not look to the doctors who swore a Hippocratic oath to heal the sick and wounded, but turn you away without insurance or money? The world is not the way we had hoped. Those with the money turn a blind eye to this because they can afford the services, and dare not upset a giant and lose their status of security. Those without the money either remain quiet, in fear, or speak out and once again, have their screams of pain fall upon deaf ears. The government sees to it that public defenders get limited amounts of money to support their client. In fact, it’s only become recently aware to this writer, that part of what the attorney makes for representing the case will be reduced by whatever they spend over the pre-approved budget. This means, limited or inefficient expert witnesses. There is no questioning tests or evaluations from the prosecution’s side, mounting a limited defense with only a best ‘hope,’ that it ‘may,’ work and all the while preparing cases for three or four other clients who occupy their time. These folks only make $1,000.00 - $3,000.00 per case usually, and may only handle 150 cases per year (that is if they’re abiding by state rules, which has often times been proven not to be the case). And, out of the $150,000 they make in a year (minimum), they will have to consider half of that to go back into the company. So, while they still make good money, they don’t want to lose their jobs and maintain that high level of cases so that their $75,000.00+ per year jobs aren’t reduced by even one case. This was a strategic development strategy employed by the government to create the illusion of having a complete and solid defense for the public’s knowledge and in a court of law, while secretly leaving people to suffer so that the giants may feed.

 Like I wrote earlier, the fear isn’t in feeling for the pain of another. Far too many people in this country have allowed their televisions, computers and their own daily strife to cloud their judgment and blind them to the pain another feels. It is not something that people will readily change any time soon. Look at the in-school shootings, IRS Bombing, 9-11 and other cases where the entire nation seemed to be in an uproar, but dissipated over night. Even the floods from Katrina have still left a wake of destruction behind them, and yet, that story has merely, ‘faded away.’  What you should be concerned about, is that you are, and you will be, next. No, there is nothing that exempts you from this situation. Every profession, lifestyle, age and background are being taken away. Even those who have lived good and pure lives are being taken away. Ask yourself, when you read or hear about a person who was convicted of being a child predator or someone who plead guilty to the crime, how often do you hear of a child involved? How often do you hear the news rattle off some minimalistic garbage about some child pornography on that computer? You have not been around for months to see what hell that person went through. You have not heard all there is to hear about the computer, that person’s lifestyle or activities, and yet, what is your first thought? You hear the words "child predator," and your mind too, is made up. This is where Juries become dangerous and court rooms become criminal. Word of mouth is spread. Anonymity or a completely fair trials have both been denied. And, yet, what of your computer? Have you received spam? If so, there’s a 50/50 chance you have child pornography on your computer right now. Have you been to an adult website or even accidentally redirected to one? Then there’s an 80% chance you have child pornography on your computer while you are reading this. Do you have any open accounts, including your computer, or have you checked your IP address this last month with any of your utility companies to ensure that nobody was hacking your system? Great, now you’ve checked it. Check it again later tonight. Then again, tomorrow. Then again later on. It may seem strange to some, but these things can happen at any time when you’re on, or even not on the internet (for your own, personal computer, it's when your open internet connection such as Broadband or DSL combined with a turned on computer that puts you at risk).  That means, you’re at 70% chance of getting caught doing something you haven’t, without taking into consideration enemies, vengeful ex's and hackers. You have an obligation to yourself, to your friends and to your family to fight. You have an obligation to end the oppression and see to it laws are re-established that ends this crude industry and that the giant is put down. It has been going on unchecked long enough, and if those of you who have remained ignorant to the truth say nothing, than at least tell your children you love them now, because very soon, you may never have the chance to even speak to them again.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Protect Children First Act

A bill was proposed to the Attorney General's office in Oregon (when it was still Hardy Meyers) entitled: The Protect Children First Bill. This bill would serve as model legislation for ALL states and the Federal government. While many of the laws in most states already contain the elements guidelining the practices of LEA, with the advents of computers in a new, technical era, those guidelines are being conveniently, overlooked. This bill would be the first of its kind to thoroughly describe and discuss computers and computer-related technology. It would provide for new requirements in evidentiary matters whereby the State and Federal Governments could no longer cheat the American Public out of justice and would have to try cases based on solid, evidence.

The focus of this bill is in the handling of Child Pornography cases - although it could very well be applied [with only minor modifications], to any and all cyber-related crimes. While many argue that these strict, evidentiary requirements make it far too easy for 'criminals,' to get away with dirty deeds, the failure in that argument is:

Most criminals who lie, WILL eventually be caught- they always are
The theory that it's okay to convict an innocent person in the hopes of convicting a guilty one is criminal itself
Stricter evidentiary requirements will result in easier and faster convictions of guilty individuals
Stricter evidentiary requirements will result in more guilty offenders being locked up than innocent people - better guaranteeing the safety of our children.
Stricter requirements on LEA and prosecutors will also result in the change in direction of current political agendas to put a greater focus on stopping the source of this material and not waiting until AFTER abuse has occurred.

The most important factor - and the reason the bill is named as such - is that it puts our children, first. By not allowing adults to run around with a mob mentality and hunt whomever they find, we are adequately providing our children with the examples, that we, the grown-up Americans of this country are responsible for providing to ensure that they grow up with the principals of equality, fairness and the security that their life, liberty and freedom are truly protected by the Constitution of this great country.
    
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »