About Me

Name: CyberMom
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Whitewashing the Country-part 1

[note - this is a 'rough' draft 'excerpt' I've worked on, addressing the many ways that explain the downfall of our Great Nation...)

Whitewashing - to cover up or gloss over -

For this entry I submit to you: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain). I submit to you also, that there was an underlying reasoning behind Mr. Clemens producing literature under an alias: he was making a political statement the likes of which was unheard of during his time. You see, for me, Tom Sawyer whitewashing the alley fence is more than just imagery of kids playing tom foolery pranks on one another, but a reflection of the Government and its people. So - let me set the scene for you (characters adjusted to today's political climate):

  • The fence is America: "...compared the insignificant whitewashed streak with the far-reaching continent of unwhitewashed fence.."
  • Tom Sawyer is The new, up and coming Government: The one sent to "cover up," the fence, leaving Tom feeling sad: "...He surveyed the fence, and all gladness left him and a deep melancholy settled down upon his spirit...."
  • Old Missis is the enforcer: "...She say she spec’ Mars Tom gwine to ax me to whitewash, an’ so she tole me go ‘long an’ ‘tend to my own business...."
  • Jim is the poorer working class/Ben the wealthier: "...Jim never got back with a bucket of water under an hour – and even then somebody generally had to go after him.."
  • Aunt Polly is the courts/regulating agencies: "...retiring from the field with a slipper in her hand and triumph in her eye..."

First - remember that Tom Sawyer was produced in 1876, during a time when Hayes was elected President through a very "sketchy" resolution, the National Convention had both parties absolutely divided and slinging mud at one another, slavery was disenfranchised, but black Americans were not yet given freedom and America, recovering from Civil War, was still in a state of turmoil. The problems that existed between parties and regions of peoples were not resolved, but instead, were being "glossed" over. Mark Twain saw the beginning of something disastrous occurring (where I also believe that Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn both represent a portion of the two, separate parties as well). So - with that said (knowing that Clemens did not get to know the disastrous, financially corrupted government of today) - let's see how Tom Sawyer has brought us forward to today's governmental body:

America is in trouble. We can either FIX the problems, or just whitewash over it - which is what we've done. For example, taxes and penalties are called: fees. High unemployment is called change. And, corrupt officials are called our 'best' hope. So, here comes Tom Sawyer ('ol Uncle Sam), lookin' at that Looooonnnngggg fence, realizing just how big of a job this is for just one person (or the handful of governmental agents), and finds himself overwhelmed. Then along comes Jim (the people). The people are the ones who aren't 'eager' to have to rush to bring up the water from the well - it'll get there. They don't care about 'corporate' deadlines or policies - they're just doin' what they're told, because 'ol misses said so. (We all do what we're told we have to do: work - pay taxes. Work - pay taxes). And, Jim's afraid of 'ol misses, cause if'n he don't do what he was tolds to do, 'ol misses is gonna whoop him up something fierce! Hey - wear your seatbelt, cross in cross-walks, don't slander authority!!

But Tom (uncle sam), doesn't like doing the work. And, when they ask for Jim's help he says: No - it's your job - and even if I'd wanted to do your job for you - I'd be in trouble for not doing my own work. But Tom's crafty, you see.... You want freedom? You want protection? You want money to purchase - and Jim says: YES! (to seeing a bandaged toe and letting Tom go down to the river for him). What happens? Well, Aunt Polly, the Courts and regulating agencies comes along and whaps the people out of the way to scold Uncle Sam and get him back to work! He has to "cover up," the underlying problems of America. Then comes along young Ben, and unlike Jim, Ben was eager for new "stuff" and new "things." So, after a bit, Tom hornswaggles the young lad into doing the worked, convinced that it's something he WANTS to do - but - in exchange for his apple. And, this went on and on until Tom went from poor - to the rich kid on the block.

Now - let's play this out in more 'modern,' terms. Sure - there's money - if you consider "IOU's," (which is what American paper/coin currency is worth - an IOU), wealth. But, you see - to have the "privilege," to work - NOT getting the things we have to do in our own homes and lives done, we gotta pay. An apple here, a kite there.... TAXES. Tom made something that was INVALUABLE (paper money), valuable, by learning that the value of an object or task is based upon the difficulty in attaining that object or completing that task. Soon - corporate greed - not in private enterprise, but through government and taxes, creates corrupted officials. It's not just the money - but the authority the government craves. And, if we want things like: FOOD, WATER, AIR, POWER, SHELTER - the BASIC necessities of life - we have to be willing to give up. But, what happens when we give up our apple?

We're hungry. Whitewashing the fence bought me this fake money that has no reward in it and I'm still hungry. So - in turn, the boys play the same game that Tom did (the start of capitalist America), taking from one another. But, Tom's no fool - he's in on EVERY piece of action by eventually saying: hey - I'll let you whitewash this fence for a fee - but in turn - you gotta pay me another fee to let someone else whitewash YOUR fence, and let me charge THEM a fee. And, like blind sheep who are told by the wolf that the grass is greener on the other side - we did it. We kept doing it. Until, eventually, we have doctors and lawyers who charge $200 per hour and up. TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR!?!? That makes NO sense!! But, you see - their worth is based on the 'difficulty,' to attain that position. And, unlike the 'older' days, now - only those who have more to give are permitted this privilege. But, because they gave more, they in turn need to charge more. And this DEADLY cycle continues.

Where's ol misses? Well, the enforcers still require the people to follow the rules and need authority. But, Uncle Sam (Tom), has gained control of the authority. So, they too, must give up to Uncle Sam in turn for a piece of that authority - and the birth of law enforcement and the end of freedom falls like a deadly, silent shadow, blanketing the whole of this country. Uncle Sam's still getting his fence whitewashed - still covering up the REAL problems in America - but he's using 'ol misses (aka the cops, fbi, et. al.) to do it for him he has gotten so lazy.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whitewashing the Country - Part 2

(continued from: Whitewashing the Country - part 2)
 
So now, not only must you pay Uncle Sam to continue in this unsuccessful, dreaded fashion and not only has it dominated our lives and lead to corruption - we're also paying Uncle Sam's henchmen to be OUR henchmen!!??
 
"There are wealthy gentlemen in England who drive four-horse passenger-coaches twenty or thirty miles on a daily line, in the summer, because the privilege costs them considerable money; but if they were offered wages for the service, that would turn it into work and then they would resign."
 
Need more proof of this? How about this: The government lists driving as: a privilege. The government defines working as: a privilege. The government defines voting as: a privilege...
 
And the government defines freedom as: A privilege. Don't believe it? Government politics, executive information and the like: knowledge of these things is a privilege, not a right, that is why we are not permitted to know these things. In this article, rights vs. privileges are examined and it is quoted in law that: "The servant cannot complain, as he takes the employment on the terms which are offered him."
 
You can read here how it was the purpose of the Republican party to fight for freedom and abolish slavery. And, today we are seeing just how the left is treating freedom - you can have the blue or green shoes - but at least you get shoes. That's freedom? No. That's the abuse of freedom underneath the same type of tyranny that is used by Kings and monopolies. It's not that I'm saying: Hey, you want protection from the bad guys, you shouldn't have to pay for it.... but, you shouldn't. The bad guys are the ones taking away your freedom in that case, and even if we mount arms against it, we're still losing our freedom under extreme work methods and taxation and what not.
 
If you don't vote, are you exempt from the rules? Nope - in fact, you're blamed for not voting for a better party. But, if you're in trouble with the law, you're ability to vote is taken away from you. So, is voting a "right?" Rights are that which cannot be interfered with by the Government - they are endowed by God and the human intellect. The term: the right to vote, is then used as a "whitewashing," of the truth, to be used a punishment against you when determined by the government to do so and FORCE you into obedience with their laws. Is that a right? Is that EVEN a privilege? No - in that case - it's neither. In that case, the whitewashing of the fence, that you paid to wash, which isn't even your fence, will lead you and those around you further down the spiral.
 
Now - some may argue about the driving thing: it's a privilege, because one has to be educated and pass the tests! Really? You mean, the tests that "certify," a person to drive, for a COST to Uncle Sam (isn't that back to whitewashing the fence...?), to sit behind a dangerous, 2000 pound chunk of steel in heavy-duty traffic, miserable (remember... it was a looonnngggg fence!)? While I won't get into my opinions on the driving matter, I simply present these issues to you in the form of Tom Sawyer's Whitewashing to show you that:
 
The government is not 'fixing,' the problem (the cars are not set to 55 mph only and constructed in a fashion to prevent accidents), they are simply glossing it over (monetizing the debt?). And, to make matters worse - when the parties that support socialism force you to wash the fence - then there is no freedom, liberty or rights involved at all. When someone's in need, (welfare), does the government offer: Hey - let's give back some of these riches we have? Can the person simply go out and play the same game (although there are no fences left to paint and they can't afford the paint?)? Or, does the government come forward to you, the painters who have already sacrificed and say: hey - that person's in need - there's no room for them on the fence to paint with us, so, until that happens, I need you to give up more of your stuff to them [so they can then, later on, pay the government for the privilege to wash the fence]. This is charity/welfare and the rest all rolled into one.
 
What's happening folks? How long before the other boys in town realize what Tom's done and come a 'knockin' at the door to tear it down? How much longer before someone calls on those "IOU's?" How far can Tom Sawyer go? Well - like the book said - he would've gone all day and bankrupted EVERY boy in town, except he just ran out of fence!!
 
How far will Uncle Sam go? Probably until the boys let him know enough's - enough - but by then, I fear it may be too late.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When schools fail, children suffer

Oh people - how do I put this to you in a way that doesn't sound so disgusting that we would rejoice at the financial devastation the schools have suffered with this current economy crisis? Let's see - I think we'll start by addressing what I believe is the foundation of education:
 
It is my personal belief, as the grandson of a highly credited and honored teacher of younger children, that the entire purpose for the education system is to offer our children the opportunity to advance their lives, starting from the point where ours come to an end.
 
Confusing? Let me 'splain - no, that would take to long, let me sum it up: Rather than reinvent the wheel from scratch, rediscover electricity, or repeat historical disasters, an education should be designed so that, by the time our children graduate and are prepared to head out into the world, they will have a foundation of knowledge upon which to build. So, instead of cutting rocks until they're shaped like a tire, they can take the rubbery treads and try to make something better. Instead of hooking a key to a kite string to determine the foundation for electricity, they can take the knowledge they've gained and design renewable energy sources and advance electrical production in a way to help all the world. And, instead of recreating the events of the world that involve war, death, famine and other atrocities, they can develop a better life for themselves.
 
But, the day that the government took over the education system, applied 'lottery' monies as the source for financial support and developed an educational standard that is substandard to the rest of the entire (non 3rd world countries) world, is the day we let down our children. I present to you this article:
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31131902/: School cancels graduation ceremony to teach cheaters a lesson.
 
Now, let's reanalyze just the title of that article: the school, the educational institution whose obligation and duty is to our children and the betterment of their lives, cancels the 'ceremonial,' rite of passage (Joseph Campbell insert here!!), that seniors go through before heading out into the world, to teach cheaters - students who broke the rules of the curriculum - a lesson (you know - lesson - as in what the school should have been providing students PRIOR to the graduation ceremonies). So, is it just me, or does that make you wonder how an ENTIRE, senior graduating class cheated? Wait a second - they didn't!! That's right - a select "few" cheated. And, as is customary for the school systems of today, rather than hold the students who did this responsible (because we wouldn't want to teach students accountability or responsibility as that would just be a silly thing to pass on before they head into the world), they are punishing everyone. In fact, part of the school's justification for this is because they "believe" (again, their all-knowing 'perceptiveness') that other seniors knew about it and didn't report it. Well, thank goodness the schools are failing to teach the importance of holding guilty students responsible, but holding those who don't feel they should betray their fellow men to the authorities for something as *gasp* terrible as cheating, because, otherwise - it might make it more reasonable that we also allow these same schools to teach our children about s - e - x!!
 
But, let's step back for a moment.. shall we? One of the tests that was cheated on (again, they 'believe) was: Early Aztec Indian History. WHAT? Wait up! Hold up, homie G. Step back, my brother. You mean that these HORRIBLE, terrible, out of control seniors DARED try to step into the modern world, amongst their fellow men, having failed to fully grasp the actual facts behind EARLY AZTEC INDIAN HISTORY? How DARE THEY! After all - the history books in schools are so accurate that - EVERY YEAR - they have to be modified to include new and updated facts!! But, let's not dwell on the point of teaching inaccurate information and focus on what's important - knowing when the aztecs planted maize in the fields vs. when they developed their ancient calendars! WoHO! These students are definitely OUT OF CONTROL!.....
...
Okay - I'm sure I'm just being silly here. Because, truthfully, we all know the REAL reason the school is upset - right? Because the students lied! I'm sure that's it! As Superintendent Holden stated, it was impossible for the school to separate the "wheat from the chaff," amongst the cheaters, non-whistleblowers and.. oh yeah.. those students who had gotten to the end by working hard. So, Holden has held to the Biblical principal - don't try to tear out the bad wheat, or you'll accidentally pull the good wheat with it (parable of Our Lord, Jesus the Christ)!! Of course, Holden and the others have failed to acknowledge that you're supposed to actually then harvest the WHOLE field and afterward separate out the bad wheat (aka - do the ceremony and then let those that cheated fail - although, I'm not sure how their cheating in world cultures or AZTEC INDIAN HISTORY, is going to cause them life failures - I know it's helped me out so many times - when watching JEAPARODY!!). Well, of course, there's also the Biblical principal that you can't know what's in the heart of another - only your own - and without FACTS - without WITNESSES - without the ACTUAL EVIDENCE - you can only assume - and therefore - CAN NOT PASS JUDGMENT. But, Holden and the others - you know - the superintendent, principals and teachers who are all supposed to be highly educated - seem to have MISSED that part of THEIR world cultures studies!!
 
But folks, this is NOT what I'm upset about. Oh no - this is not even the BEST of the story. You see, the best part of this story is about to come - the part where the school must hang its head in SHAME, where the ENTIRE school district must be put to the utmost scrutiny and punished for this. Why? Well, I know many of you are still feeling that the school is justified. Many of you are still believing the school is in the right because we shouldn't let cheaters through - even if it's only for world cultures and stupid information that's not going to help the non-future archaeologists - even if it means punishing the innocent along with the guilty (and yes -the innocent are punished when their rite of passage - a VITAL part of growing up and the ENTIRE point of working hard in school is to achieve success and feel the good effects of their accomplishment through that Rite). So, let me point out the painfully obvious that, thus far, has apparently been missed:
 
The school didn't "catch," the cheaters. Oh no - the school "noticed" HIGHER THAN EXPECTED GRADES - and it brought to their attention the potential for cheating. STOP! HOLD ON - and let's rethink this. "Higher - than - expected - grades." So... the school noticed that students were getting high grades and this was concern for cheating? Well, I mean - of course, why not? After all, we wouldn't expect our students in American schools to actually be getting good grades, right? It's just silly to believe that students might be doing good - or that the TEACHERS ARE DOING THEIR JOBS!! Okay - who's lost? Who doesn't get the point I just made? Those of you that are missing this - get up - go wash your face off with cold water - and re-read the article, especially the part about the parents holding their own ceremony and the school not being welcome. Reread the part about one student having the test and still failing - and that this is one of the highest, academically rated schools in the state!!
 
Just remember - because it is one of the highest rated schools, wouldn't mean much if the graduating grade-level of a high-school senior is less than the fourth grade (no, that's not an insult to the students - but to the educators and the system teaching them). The students were SO disinclined to care about world cultures, so unmotivated by their teachers - so worried about a teacher who obviously likes to make the "tough" tests that they feared they wouldn't pass - that they cheated. Do students cheat because it's easy? Maybe - but fear and guilt always play a factor in that equation - such as fear of not knowing info on the final - so the usual answer is - NO. Students cheat when they're worried about their grades, about not passing - because - whether it's their fault or the teacher's - they didn't get the information. Now, not knowing the teaching style in the classroom, here's the only thing I can say, and the point of all of this:
 
THE SCHOOL FAILED. Not the students who cheated or didn't "whistleblow," but the SCHOOL. Cheaters don't cheat others, they cheat themselves. Their going through the rite of passage would have been empty and unfulfilling and they would have been the ones to suffer for it (well, if we were talking about reading or math, albeit ANCIENT Aztec history is SO vital to getting a job at some big company like ... Congress). The school is withholding the ceremonial graduation because they are EMBARRASSED! They are humiliated. They are.. wait.. stupid. Why? Because - they could have held the graduation ceremony and notified the parents of the cheaters and not invited them. Wait - haven't schools done that in the past? Isn't that what happens for a student who doesn't graduate? Why, yes, it is!! The school could have kept this under the carpet, protected the HARD WORKING, deserving students (because those world cultures cheaters are so terribly bad!!), and maintained the ceremonial graduation and SAVED FACE in light of having had to realize that there were cheaters amongst them when their students, in their "highly accredited" school got good grades............. (sorry.... have to pause again as I am dumbfounded by the sheer ignorance of the school in making that public.........), and still operated in the fashion that a low-grade, poor-quality, American school usually does.
 
Folks - this is not a travesty - this is an absolute failure of the system. This is so degrading that it reeks of filth and putrescence. I am so disgusted by this, that my grandmother is rolling over in her coffin. If one of her students was struggling, if she thought that they felt the need to cheat, one on one, she would step up to the plate, talk with their parents, and try to help. My son's school will call me if they feel there are issues that my child is having, and open the lines of communication (expecting, as they should, that I as his dad should be responsible for my own child), to help my child succeed. They don't just assume he's stupid and should get bad grades - like the ENTIRE education system in OHIO! Ohio residents should be outraged. They should be terminating the ENTIRE school board system - and let them see what it means to punish the innocent with the guilty - then rehire the ENTIRE staff, weeding out the idiots. You see - the problem is that - the schools are not just failing in what level of education they provide, they are failing in how they operate:
 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,172416,00.html: Long Island School cancels prom, doesn't want to support orgy
 
Should I even bother? Should I even bother to tell you why this is wrong, and how wrong it is? Do you not understand? Yes - the parents that are supporting a pre-prom cocktail party are WRONG - and they should have to be dealt with. The police can sit outside wherever these students are having their party, raid it and make bank (as they were probably planning anyway). But, the school doesn't want to support an "orgy." First off - just publishing that is WRONG. These are young minds who have obviously been swayed toward the degraded, low-end of the evolutionary ladder. Do we need to call their prom an "orgy?" Are we not encouraging MORE of this behavior? The school is right not to support this - I agree. NO ONE should support participating in ANY activity which degrades a child, no matter the circumstance. Is a graduation ceremony for a "potential" cheater, degrading? No - not at all - it's their cross to bear and a disgusting treatment of the hard working students - but so is cancelling a prom that the parents are the wealthy ones sponsoring, and will sponsor anyways!! The kids are going to Disneyland to stay in hotels together without ANY adult supervision?
 
The REAL problem? The school cancels the prom because, under THEIR supervision - THEIR guidance (and sorry Kellenberg Memorial PRIVATE high school - but it is YOUR responsibility what takes place AT and DURING the prom), that Brother Hoagland (yes - "BROTHER" as in MAN OF THE CLOTH) felt had turned into an orgy. But, wait - that's not true. "During" the prom, while the students stand in a gym and dance, they are monitored. Oh no - hold on, my bad - the school has been letting them rent out some big house and hold the prom there, unsupervised, where the kiddies are fed alcohol - even though one of the parents thinks it SUCKS that THEIR good student, that they have helped instill with morals, shouldn't be TALLIED in with the guilty and FALSELY labeled and alcoholic and drug addict. So - who failed, the students? Yes, in part - because they are not so ignorant enough to understand that societal norms don't support their raging hormones getting themselves pregnant as teenagers. Did society? Oh - big time - I can't even begin to say this enough.... Did the parents? Yeah - if every time you give your kid money, peer pressure leads them to go buy alcohol or drugs - STOP giving them MONEY - duh (at least the parents said they're relieved and glad that the schools morals are "saving" them - not the kids - but the parents, from contributing to their child's delinquency....?? um.. what? What IDIOT said this? How did they become a parent? How have they managed to actually survive up until now without walking off the edge of a well-marked cliff-side?)? Did the school - YES. YES. and.. um, YES.
 
What takes place after the prom- that's NOT the school's responsibility. What takes before the prom - is not the school's either. If it's an alcohol issue - I'm sure that the Sheriff's department would have more than gladly (and probably delighted in it as they are sadistic), stood at the door and offered the 'quick-check' alcohol breath strip, if the teachers were too afraid to. Then - the kids with the responsibility and maturity level of a dog in heat - could have been kept out.
 
Finally, what does this all mean? What is the point of my long-winded banter? (hey - it's a blog - not a newspaper article!!). It means, that when the school has options to consider holding students accountable and responsible, yet fails to do so - it hurts the students. When a school punishes the innocent, it teaches them their hard work and efforts were for nothing and it hurts the students. It teaches the 'stray' kids that they can keep doing what they're doing and let the innocent take the fall. It means that these people are setting BAD examples for our children. It means these people have no idea what the purpose and value of an education is. School is MORE than just reading books - it's opening your mind. Of course - the school in New York has taught one valuable lesson - they're not going to keep letting history repeat itself - just only after it's happened over and over and over again and didn't "self resolve," magically. Hmm... I wonder if that's not the same, ignorant standard that the world leaders used when they ignored Hitler after he took one country... then another... then another... the problem not resolving itself, until finally, they took a stand. Hey - I guess history DOES repeat itself!! And, the school DID fail to teach a valuable lesson...
 
No... wait.. that's not good.. is it? Good luck!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »