About Me

Name: CyberMom
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Capitalism or Free Enterprise, part 1 of 2

When did we lose track? When did we suddenly decide one day that we are sheep, not people, and let those in charge blatantly lie to us? At what point did those in charge decide to start lying to us? I know I've addressed this issue before, but I have a couple more tidbits of "interesting," ideas to help this concern along... for you see, the United States Government has been misleading the people for quite some time. Through Capitalism, America has become a nation of greed and power. Through Capitalism, good people have been hurt. And, while many members of the media talk about America's right to be a 'Capitalist,' society, what they are really trying to refer to (I hope), is free enterprise. But, there's a huge distinction between a Capitalism and free enterprise, and it begins with the corruption of entire nations. Let's begin with an old, "conspiracy," that is not quite such a "conspiracy," as some people might believe:

Flouride. What's that you say? What does Flouride have to do with anything in politics and scandals? Well, I'll let you read the article for yourself. In fact, I encourage you to not just follow the links I've posted, but do your own research - at home or in a library. The sum total explanation is this: Flouride is a toxic waste product, that many scientific studies and EPA standards have validated is poisonous. In fact, one of the EPA reports I've linked to, confirms the facts I am presenting to you now. So, why is it in water? The aluminum industry is huge. In fact, it's so huge, that it has been a major, economic driving force since the post World War II era, when, for many years, the toxic dumping of toxic waste byproducts from aluminum manufacturing were legally deposited in landfills. However, around the mid-70's or so, based on the poisons found in the bloodstreams of millions, the EPA began to set landfill standards - including the refusal of dumping toxic chemicals in oceans, lakes, streams and landfills. Flouride was then a problem that one of the largest textile industries in the world had to deal with. And, thank goodness to Capitalism and money, they were able to buy their way into the water streams of every household and mouth of every person in this country and dispose of it through human ingestion.

Now, let's look at the FCC, television and commercials. You spend time watching your television, enjoying your shows about beautiful people in perfect bodies, with great teeth, a full head of hair and nice, thin waist-lines. This is quickly and FREQUENTLY interrupted by a series of commercials that do what? They tell you how IMPERFECT and UGLY you really are. They point out your bad teeth and the toothpaste you need, the Rogaine or hair coloring products you need for your head, the diet pills and excercise machines for your fat, the face creams and anti-aging products for your skin, and so on and so on. In other words, Hollywood, much like the American Dental Association (ADA), was offered a big, fat check for LYING to you. Hollywood tells you who's ugly, and who's not. Hollywood tells you what's popular and acceptable, and what's not. This marketing strategy is amongst the most corrupt and vile forms of subliminal messaging that is possible, today. Trust me, if you go to take advertising and marketing in college for four or five years, you'll get to see first hand how they mold you into working for the Capitalist markets. But, given these two examples, what has this got to do with Capitalism?

Mind you, I could have chosen from a myriad of tens of thousands of examples. However, I specifically chose two areas of our common, every-day life that we tend to take for granted. I did this, because you need understand, that Government "lies," are not limited to what takes place in "Congress." Forget Congress. The laws they have already passed, the agencies already in place and the people supporting Congress are the biggest threat to our lives. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - an agency set up by our Government and paid for through tax-payer dollars to regulate the safety of the environment and us, has passed regulations to dump toxic waste into the drinking water and do so under the guise: it's good for you! Remember the advertisements for cigarettes long, long ago? If you have a sore throat - smoke! It REALLY works! In fact, the cigarettes you smoke work so well that they'll numb your throat through the systematic destruction of the cells, providing you long-term relief. Hey, what about the ADA? It is a government established agency designed to regulate the administration of dental services, and along with the FDA, toothpastes, mouthwashes, etc. Go look at your tube of toothpaste right now. No - really, I'll wait. Go get it and come back........ (musical interlude)........... got it? Okay - now read the back: Warning: Harmful or fatal if swallowed - contact the poison control center immediately! [Sure - yours will be a variant of this - but you get the gist]. TOOTHPASTE WILL KILL YOU? Yes. Why? Flouride (amongst one or two other chemicals also contained in some toothpastes). But, that's not really the big one - the big one is a chemical whose initials are SLS. This is an industrial grade, silicon scrubbing agent that is abrasive and designed NOT to remove the plaque from your teeth, but the enamel. Don't believe me? Go ahead - you look this one up.

The point? The point is: The government is lying. And, when the government lies, WE THE PEOPLE SUFFER. I've been saying this for a while, but wanted to point out a couple small parts of your life here: the toothpaste you HAVE to buy to whiten your teeth so you can look like the perfect man or woman from your favorite, unrealistic reality show, is filled with none other than: Toxic waste and chemicals designed to make you need the services of a dentist. Capitalism people. Capitalism is NOT free enterprise. If you'd take a moment, there is a very well written article on Capitalism that was done in 2006, before the Obama era, that clearly outlines some of the major points of Capitalism. An overtly philisophical article was written in 1996 and detailed the failure of these two processes as functional together. The truth, which you will rarely find in many on-line articles and texts out there is this: Capitalism, by its sheer nature and definition, is a political structure that when, the leaders of an economy influence the decisions of a government - it becomes Capitalism. In the case of Democracy, Capitalism is the tip of an iceberg which will eventually sink the Titanic. Capitalism not only represents a minority few, but it represents those who want money. Its selfish greed is self-destructive and will inevitably destroy itself in sheer, Marxist Socialism style when arrogance marches headfirst into the arms of destruction.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Capitalism or Free Enterprise, part 2

While there are many angles of Capitalism to discuss, for the purposes of America and this article, I'll focus on Capitalism and Democracy.

Examples of Capitalism in Democracy:

Laws that are passed that do not include the voters, the interest of the voters or the interest of the welfare of the majority. Let's take for example the laws that were lifted from pharmaceuticals permitting them to advertise on television, and within a few years, the price of prescriptions 800% and people who needed prescriptions to survive, died. What about laws that permit the poisoning of our drinking water and the sale of toothpaste to children that contains poisonous chemicals like Titanium Dioxide? What about laws that govern the prices of our food, our oil, what we can and cannot buy, and so on? The truth is - I could detail some very disturbing facts for you about how our entire political structure has been commanded for many, many years now by Capitalist leaders (ie. DuPont - the leaders in Titanium Dioxide production), whose sole goal is money. But, if you don't already know this - by the computer you sit in front of, the number of televisions in your home, the cars in your garage, the size and mortgage of your home, the name brand on the clothes you wear, the cartoon/commercially driven to purchase toys in your child's room and the slew of other, obvious facts all around you- then I'm afraid you are the one I spoke of when I first wrote this article and asked: when did we trade being people - for being sheep?

This is just not wolves in sheep’s clothing. At least the wolves eat the sheep for the reasons of survival. This would be the equivalent of the shepard selling out his own sheep and leading them to the wolves in trade for a pocket of gold and all the wool he could want, shear free! This is NOT free enterprise.

So, what is free enterprise? Free enterprise is exactly what it says: a competition market where anyone can compete against one another. This is what creates good pricing – not the government giving sole rights for ISBN licensing to Bowker, LLC., so they can charge people whatever they want and control the market. Free enterprise allows people to build a better mouse trap and offer it on an open market, not create 3 credit bureaus with all their flaws and corruption to dictate the terms of an individual’s life. In an article by Robert J. Samuelson with the Washington Post, he attributes Capitalism’s ability to survive to its diversity and America as a whole. However, I would counter this and say that he is in fact, incorrect. Capitalism has not thrived based on a system of diversity. Anyone who invests at the upper echelons of the stock market knows this – because they know that companies such as Viacom, DuPont and others, are the parent/umbrella corporations for a vast array of companies below them, and in fact, there is little diversity in our current economy. Additionally, I would support this with the every-growing siege on America by Capitalism:

If Capitalism could thrive based solely upon its diversity – then why pay off government agencies (who have a dictatorial authority over the people through the enforcement of laws vs. the threat of prison and death) - to pass laws that permit the poisoning of our water? Why develop a nation of TV-brained imbeciles who don’t recognize the harm of constantly being told how bad they are, and then buy the anti-depressant from the next commercial to get their “pill fix?” Or, perhaps this is the Diversity that Mr. Samuelson refers to – even if he doesn’t realize it. Perhaps Mr. Samuelson’s references to “entrepreneurial culture,” and “work ethic,” as Capitalism’s building blocks are truly the masquerade upon which it keeps its victims as easy targets. No – there is NO free enterprise. Free enterprise is gone. I cannot go put up a stand on a corner in the middle of town, or outside my house, and sell my vegetables.

Why not? Taxation, regulation, ordinances, fees, licensing, permits, applications, limitations, infringements upon minority groups, and a slew of other nonsensical laws that the Federal Government – a body that was designed to represent the people and defend this country – had no business passing. If this were a free enterprise, I could build a car tomorrow and sell it. You say – sure you can – go ahead. You say, just fill out the forms, pay the fees, apply for the licenses, pay for your own advertising – and you’re good to go.

Really? Are you sure about that? What about the competitive clauses that I alone may not face as a small guy – but if I were to try and build, say 10 million cars – that would forbid me that right? Need a better example? Try looking up what Walmart has not only done to small business, but the added regulations Walmart has helped “encourage” in towns across America, in Federal and State Legislation, that kill those small businesses. In fact, many of those same laws have eventually come back to bite Walmart, hard, until it exerts itself upon our political leaders and forces through laws for its own special interest and success. Again – when government crosses over into free enterprise - it is no longer free. Greece had the perfect example:

Along the row of shops in the city, anyone could bring their wares, set up shop and sell them. End of story. Nothing else to tell. Now-a-days, if you try to set up shop, you get sued or some law is passed that forbids you to go into business. It would be like me contacting Toshiba, ordering 20 million computers and laptops, and setting up an on-line company to sell those laptops direct to consumers. Now we have a lawsuit issue with Dell, buyout options and government regulations galore. Sure – I suppose you can still argue that it is free enterprise – but as Samuelson said in his article: entrepreneurial culture. And, that is what Free enterprise is. So Capitalism stands upon the shoulders of that standard. Its foundation is the abuse of free enterprise and the systematic destruction of competition through political control. Else, why would Capitalism even need a hand in the political arena?

However, when the media and many others discuss the infringement on Capitalism by the Government’s march toward socialism, they are missing the mark entirely. Capitalism is the point in which free enterprise gives way to Socialism when it gets a boost from the politicians of the day who suddenly pass laws defending companies like Amtrak, because they are also invested in that company and have to protect their own interests. In the book: Corruption, Capitalism and Democracy, from Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, they discuss how the collusion between elitist politicians and elitist financially wealthy “capitalists,” (those who believe that the economy should dictate the laws – or He who has the gold “makes” the rules), are furthering the expansion of capitalist practive and market practice at the expense of democratic practice and public values.

So: Capitalism = free enterprise taking political control of the masses for its own, selfish gain; and in Democracy = the end of freedom. Thus, Capitalism = The end of freedom. But, you’re free, aren’t you? You can decide not to watch their shows, buy their “stuff,” and be independent, can’t you? HAHAHA – go ahead and try. The rules the government puts into place requires you to subscribe to the whims of Capitalism to keep it thriving. However, the greed on top never gets enough, the elitists get too fat, and the people just get poorer until there’s no more to give. This leads to rebellion and war (The Boston Tea Party for anyone interested in an example). Welcome to Free America. You’re free to shop and spend – and they’ll tell you to – a lot. It will be all around you; your iron will shall be shattered. Your beliefs shall be made frail upon your social condition. Your fear and hatred of your fellow man shall be made manifest by the infringement not upon your person – but your “stuff,” and how much it will cost you (or in a lawsuit – how much you’ll gain).  

But, what do you take with you from all of this?

Either you’re at home now, or you’ll be going home soon. And, you’ll need gas to drive your car. You’ll believe that you need 10 cops to every 1 person just to keep you safe on your journey. You’ll buy the food at the store that they make available, poisons or not. You’ll trust the FDA, the EPA, the ADA, the AMA and any other board that’s “government,” backed, because the government is SO honest – but regardless – you have to eat.

So when was it? When did we stray off the path? When was the point of no return? I ask these questions, because if you can discover the point that we were fooled by the Shepard, you’ll be able to see how and where the wolves got in. You’ll be able to be prepared for what’s coming. After all, with the entire Country up in arms over this president, a nation on the verge of frailty and fear, and a capitalist community just waiting for the opportunity to pounce, there’s no reason to fear, is there? It’s not like the fall of the government or the march to socialism will be replaced by Capitalists, is it? It’s not like the media is dishonest at all, is it? Or maybe – just maybe – if they know we can see them coming, the capitalists will lose their supporters – the sold out and self-righteous manufacturers that produce products that harm us. And, when we cut out our tax support, when the authorities no longer have a job in such great numbers, they won’t be as apt to stand up to us. When we turn off the television, they’ll lose their support.
 
I guess only time can tell if free enterprise shall rise from the ashes ever again. Until then, now you know, when you hear the word: Capitalism, what they really mean. Good Luck!
 
(by the way - when I reference a link - that does not mean I endorse it in whole or in part, but have found at least a portion of it to be useful - just fyi)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Democracy Inherently Fails

Sorry to say this - but Democracy has an inherent flaw within it which is doomed to failure if not held in the absolute perfection of brotherly love and human kindness:
 
population growth
 
Think about this: ten people vote tomorrow that they should have to get rid of foods high in salt. Six people vote yes, four - no. The result? Four people are going to not only lose the food they like, but they're going to have a nasty habit to kick.
 
Now - 300 milliion people are asked to vote on whether or not they should get rid of foods high in salt. 151 million people vote yes, 149 million people - no.
 
McDonald's is bankrupt!
 
HAHA - okay - silliness aside, the truth is: when you have a group of 10 people, most likely, they won't need to absolutely vote on things, because they can find ways to get along. When your numbers begin to reach 100 or more -- you may need some voting. However, when your numbers reach 300 million - Democracy, which is to support the majority - puts out 149 million people. Sure, 151 million's the majority. But, putting out 149 million people is a SIGNIFICANTLY bad thing. In fact, it WILL result in problems. Now..
 
Enter into the equation: capitalism and special interest groups. Now we can vote in laws that bankrupt people, screw the majority, and suddenly you see a big sign ahead of you: Welcome to America. *sigh* But I digress...
 
The Representative Democracy, which we have now, does NOT function. When we remove the people's vote - their power and their voice - and place it in the hands of the powerful - we SCREW OURSELVES. Case in point:
 
Recent news story: to save $400,000, some cities are turning off their night-time street lights. Hmm? Wonder why those lights are there in the first place, right? Maybe.. just maybe... security? Well, now people are in fear. Are they going to offer to turn the streetlights back on? Nope - they'll offer to hire more law enforcement. Will that stop the problem? Nope. But, when the politicians hire a $60k per year cop and charge you $80k - and pocket $20 - you'll keep quiet, or not only will you have the night-time dangers to deal with, the law enforcement will be on your tail. Think I'm wrong?
 
Ever been pulled over, or nervous, because your License Registration for your CAR is about to expire or is expired? Let's say, you register once with the DMV. They have you in a database. There you stay. But now, you have to PAY, every year to stay in that database. Why? Because - they want money. So, they create a law that says you'll pay them every year to do NOTHING, or else you get fined, maybe thrown in jail and possibly lose your car. By NOT registering after that first time, are you hurting anyone? Are you endangering anyone? Are you harrassing anyone or causing ANYONE IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD ANY problems? Nope. But, now, because YOU'RE NOT PAYING the DMV to KEEP WORKING, simply because they want you to, the cops can stop you and harrass you.
 
What else could the city do to save some expenses? I don't know - maybe they can quit building frivolous GARBAGE! Maybe they can take a paycut in their overhead? Maybe they could shut the lights off in the town hall at midnight? MAYBE they could condense the city police force (since there's already sheriff's and State police running around the city), and save some BIG bucks!? But, representative Democracy not only does NOT represent the majority - it represents the beliefs and power of that ONE person.
 
Not convinced?
 
Well then - final PROOF. There's a health care bill out there that ALL of America does not support - and yet Congress is still considering it. Why? They don't NEED us. They don't represent us. The people's vote does not count anymore. What do they say instead? They believe Obama's still in favor with the people because a recent "poll," shows 57% of the people in favor of him. Really? What 57%? you mean the 1,000 outrageously liberal, Democrats interviewed at Berkely University? I'm sorry - REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY does NOT MEAN, that 1/1 millionth of the PEOPLE represent the WHOLE! That's BACKWARDS and STUPID!
 
And so children, we close today with these simple words: After a Nation reaches a certain size, if you still have a Democracy, and those who are in charge are accustomed to ignoring the voices of HUNDREDS of millions of people, don't be surprised, when it takes on its final stage of evolution: Dictatorship.
 
Thanks!! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whitewashing the Country-part 1

[note - this is a 'rough' draft 'excerpt' I've worked on, addressing the many ways that explain the downfall of our Great Nation...)

Whitewashing - to cover up or gloss over -

For this entry I submit to you: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain). I submit to you also, that there was an underlying reasoning behind Mr. Clemens producing literature under an alias: he was making a political statement the likes of which was unheard of during his time. You see, for me, Tom Sawyer whitewashing the alley fence is more than just imagery of kids playing tom foolery pranks on one another, but a reflection of the Government and its people. So - let me set the scene for you (characters adjusted to today's political climate):

  • The fence is America: "...compared the insignificant whitewashed streak with the far-reaching continent of unwhitewashed fence.."
  • Tom Sawyer is The new, up and coming Government: The one sent to "cover up," the fence, leaving Tom feeling sad: "...He surveyed the fence, and all gladness left him and a deep melancholy settled down upon his spirit...."
  • Old Missis is the enforcer: "...She say she spec’ Mars Tom gwine to ax me to whitewash, an’ so she tole me go ‘long an’ ‘tend to my own business...."
  • Jim is the poorer working class/Ben the wealthier: "...Jim never got back with a bucket of water under an hour – and even then somebody generally had to go after him.."
  • Aunt Polly is the courts/regulating agencies: "...retiring from the field with a slipper in her hand and triumph in her eye..."

First - remember that Tom Sawyer was produced in 1876, during a time when Hayes was elected President through a very "sketchy" resolution, the National Convention had both parties absolutely divided and slinging mud at one another, slavery was disenfranchised, but black Americans were not yet given freedom and America, recovering from Civil War, was still in a state of turmoil. The problems that existed between parties and regions of peoples were not resolved, but instead, were being "glossed" over. Mark Twain saw the beginning of something disastrous occurring (where I also believe that Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn both represent a portion of the two, separate parties as well). So - with that said (knowing that Clemens did not get to know the disastrous, financially corrupted government of today) - let's see how Tom Sawyer has brought us forward to today's governmental body:

America is in trouble. We can either FIX the problems, or just whitewash over it - which is what we've done. For example, taxes and penalties are called: fees. High unemployment is called change. And, corrupt officials are called our 'best' hope. So, here comes Tom Sawyer ('ol Uncle Sam), lookin' at that Looooonnnngggg fence, realizing just how big of a job this is for just one person (or the handful of governmental agents), and finds himself overwhelmed. Then along comes Jim (the people). The people are the ones who aren't 'eager' to have to rush to bring up the water from the well - it'll get there. They don't care about 'corporate' deadlines or policies - they're just doin' what they're told, because 'ol misses said so. (We all do what we're told we have to do: work - pay taxes. Work - pay taxes). And, Jim's afraid of 'ol misses, cause if'n he don't do what he was tolds to do, 'ol misses is gonna whoop him up something fierce! Hey - wear your seatbelt, cross in cross-walks, don't slander authority!!

But Tom (uncle sam), doesn't like doing the work. And, when they ask for Jim's help he says: No - it's your job - and even if I'd wanted to do your job for you - I'd be in trouble for not doing my own work. But Tom's crafty, you see.... You want freedom? You want protection? You want money to purchase - and Jim says: YES! (to seeing a bandaged toe and letting Tom go down to the river for him). What happens? Well, Aunt Polly, the Courts and regulating agencies comes along and whaps the people out of the way to scold Uncle Sam and get him back to work! He has to "cover up," the underlying problems of America. Then comes along young Ben, and unlike Jim, Ben was eager for new "stuff" and new "things." So, after a bit, Tom hornswaggles the young lad into doing the worked, convinced that it's something he WANTS to do - but - in exchange for his apple. And, this went on and on until Tom went from poor - to the rich kid on the block.

Now - let's play this out in more 'modern,' terms. Sure - there's money - if you consider "IOU's," (which is what American paper/coin currency is worth - an IOU), wealth. But, you see - to have the "privilege," to work - NOT getting the things we have to do in our own homes and lives done, we gotta pay. An apple here, a kite there.... TAXES. Tom made something that was INVALUABLE (paper money), valuable, by learning that the value of an object or task is based upon the difficulty in attaining that object or completing that task. Soon - corporate greed - not in private enterprise, but through government and taxes, creates corrupted officials. It's not just the money - but the authority the government craves. And, if we want things like: FOOD, WATER, AIR, POWER, SHELTER - the BASIC necessities of life - we have to be willing to give up. But, what happens when we give up our apple?

We're hungry. Whitewashing the fence bought me this fake money that has no reward in it and I'm still hungry. So - in turn, the boys play the same game that Tom did (the start of capitalist America), taking from one another. But, Tom's no fool - he's in on EVERY piece of action by eventually saying: hey - I'll let you whitewash this fence for a fee - but in turn - you gotta pay me another fee to let someone else whitewash YOUR fence, and let me charge THEM a fee. And, like blind sheep who are told by the wolf that the grass is greener on the other side - we did it. We kept doing it. Until, eventually, we have doctors and lawyers who charge $200 per hour and up. TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR!?!? That makes NO sense!! But, you see - their worth is based on the 'difficulty,' to attain that position. And, unlike the 'older' days, now - only those who have more to give are permitted this privilege. But, because they gave more, they in turn need to charge more. And this DEADLY cycle continues.

Where's ol misses? Well, the enforcers still require the people to follow the rules and need authority. But, Uncle Sam (Tom), has gained control of the authority. So, they too, must give up to Uncle Sam in turn for a piece of that authority - and the birth of law enforcement and the end of freedom falls like a deadly, silent shadow, blanketing the whole of this country. Uncle Sam's still getting his fence whitewashed - still covering up the REAL problems in America - but he's using 'ol misses (aka the cops, fbi, et. al.) to do it for him he has gotten so lazy.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whitewashing the Country - Part 2

(continued from: Whitewashing the Country - part 2)
 
So now, not only must you pay Uncle Sam to continue in this unsuccessful, dreaded fashion and not only has it dominated our lives and lead to corruption - we're also paying Uncle Sam's henchmen to be OUR henchmen!!??
 
"There are wealthy gentlemen in England who drive four-horse passenger-coaches twenty or thirty miles on a daily line, in the summer, because the privilege costs them considerable money; but if they were offered wages for the service, that would turn it into work and then they would resign."
 
Need more proof of this? How about this: The government lists driving as: a privilege. The government defines working as: a privilege. The government defines voting as: a privilege...
 
And the government defines freedom as: A privilege. Don't believe it? Government politics, executive information and the like: knowledge of these things is a privilege, not a right, that is why we are not permitted to know these things. In this article, rights vs. privileges are examined and it is quoted in law that: "The servant cannot complain, as he takes the employment on the terms which are offered him."
 
You can read here how it was the purpose of the Republican party to fight for freedom and abolish slavery. And, today we are seeing just how the left is treating freedom - you can have the blue or green shoes - but at least you get shoes. That's freedom? No. That's the abuse of freedom underneath the same type of tyranny that is used by Kings and monopolies. It's not that I'm saying: Hey, you want protection from the bad guys, you shouldn't have to pay for it.... but, you shouldn't. The bad guys are the ones taking away your freedom in that case, and even if we mount arms against it, we're still losing our freedom under extreme work methods and taxation and what not.
 
If you don't vote, are you exempt from the rules? Nope - in fact, you're blamed for not voting for a better party. But, if you're in trouble with the law, you're ability to vote is taken away from you. So, is voting a "right?" Rights are that which cannot be interfered with by the Government - they are endowed by God and the human intellect. The term: the right to vote, is then used as a "whitewashing," of the truth, to be used a punishment against you when determined by the government to do so and FORCE you into obedience with their laws. Is that a right? Is that EVEN a privilege? No - in that case - it's neither. In that case, the whitewashing of the fence, that you paid to wash, which isn't even your fence, will lead you and those around you further down the spiral.
 
Now - some may argue about the driving thing: it's a privilege, because one has to be educated and pass the tests! Really? You mean, the tests that "certify," a person to drive, for a COST to Uncle Sam (isn't that back to whitewashing the fence...?), to sit behind a dangerous, 2000 pound chunk of steel in heavy-duty traffic, miserable (remember... it was a looonnngggg fence!)? While I won't get into my opinions on the driving matter, I simply present these issues to you in the form of Tom Sawyer's Whitewashing to show you that:
 
The government is not 'fixing,' the problem (the cars are not set to 55 mph only and constructed in a fashion to prevent accidents), they are simply glossing it over (monetizing the debt?). And, to make matters worse - when the parties that support socialism force you to wash the fence - then there is no freedom, liberty or rights involved at all. When someone's in need, (welfare), does the government offer: Hey - let's give back some of these riches we have? Can the person simply go out and play the same game (although there are no fences left to paint and they can't afford the paint?)? Or, does the government come forward to you, the painters who have already sacrificed and say: hey - that person's in need - there's no room for them on the fence to paint with us, so, until that happens, I need you to give up more of your stuff to them [so they can then, later on, pay the government for the privilege to wash the fence]. This is charity/welfare and the rest all rolled into one.
 
What's happening folks? How long before the other boys in town realize what Tom's done and come a 'knockin' at the door to tear it down? How much longer before someone calls on those "IOU's?" How far can Tom Sawyer go? Well - like the book said - he would've gone all day and bankrupted EVERY boy in town, except he just ran out of fence!!
 
How far will Uncle Sam go? Probably until the boys let him know enough's - enough - but by then, I fear it may be too late.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Key turning points in recent US History - part 2

The next major turning point: The March to Capitalism; (1937 - 1955)

Prior to WWII, a lot of folks who had been working on military surplus items were laid off, and soon, an economic depression fell upon the US. President Roosevelt worked hard to overcome many of the hurdles of this depression and mitigated a few, but not enough of them. We were hurting in a bad way. One of Roosevelt's solutions was to encourage capitalism... the beginning of what has brought us to our knees today. It was also the beginning of a Fascist/Marxist Social regime. Roosevelt's "New Deal" allowed the government to grow larger, turning to private enterprise in order to create jobs. We were well prepared for another war, but allowed growth in a variety of areas that gave rise to American complacency with the government being injected into multiple facets of their personal lives - since the people were hungry - they needed jobs and accepted these terms. And, as I've written in previous posts, Capitalism and Democracy make strange bedfellows. The Reuther Plan, through an interest in selfish, capital gains, encouraged a fear amongst the people, and through unions, to seek government contracts - all the while - driving up taxes in the background. Through the Lend-Lease act, America helped Russia and England fight the ongoing war with $32.5 billion in exports. A boone to the economy without us being involved. Just as the government had learned, they could drive up taxes without the people. Capitalism was leading legislation, and thusly, taxation. What appeared to be our 'salvation,' was being lead by corrupt people with intensly, selfish, personal agendas; and that's NOT a good foundation for salvation...
But,  it wasn't enough for private capitalists and military leaders wanting more. Pearl Harbor met its fate in 1941 (a conspiracy I won't address here in any further detail). Now, Roosevelt's declaration of what we 'needed' a year earlier, would come to pass. Our economy would be 'transformed' into the "Arsenal of Democracy." So, now, using the fear of the people, even though we had been building a huge arsenal, that arsenal had been sent to slaughter, and the Government, the instigators of that attack, knew how the people would react. They would want us to be more prepared. They would want us to retaliate. And Capitalism and Democracy, sitting in their big, bureaucratic chairs, were rolling in the dough. And, for what? The cost of a few hundred.. even a few thousand American lives? Of course, the government's spending did NOT go to the general public as Roosevelt had intended - he was not the arbitrator of this downfall in our history. His administration was taken advantage of, and military spending budgets, government budgets and the private capitalists they were in bed with went primarily uncontrolled. Taxation even began to be taken out of the American worker's paycheck - no longer as a lump sum. Not only were the good contracts NOT going to the people - but now they were going to make less money, without their vote, without their consent, but also - without their willingness to retaliate due to the fear that had occurred with the attack on American soil. See - American vessels had been attacked already, as it had been in WWI - but that wasn't enough. People blamed WWI for the great depression (mistakingly, as I've pointed out), and had a bad taste in their mouths. So, the government had to 'step up' the whole matter and have an 'attack' on American soil.
 
Prosperity was at hand. The benefit from murdering people was MORE money in the pocket. Thanks to labor unions, capitalist control in legislature and a larger, world-wide economic base, our economy grew. Everyone was being offered jobs, even those of non-white heritage during a time in which segregation was still an issue. The people graciously accepted governmental control - it was their savior. This is a VERY dark period in our history. What's that you say? How can I see an economic boost as a downpoint? Simple - greed. Greed causes blindness. We turned a blind eye to the fact we had been developing the atomic bomb, or missles with nuclear capacity. We turned a blind eye to the development of stealth bombers with the capcity to carry large, nuclear payloads. The government was building weapons of mass death, and our wallets were growing. We had gone from broke to rich overnight!! Had the depression NOT been there - this wouldn't have happened. While I won't theorize that the ENTIRETY of the depression and WWII was a scheme intended on having this effect, I will say this: the government had learned well from WWI - and in this turning point in American history, had injected into society a blinding GREED. The same greed that gave way to investors BLINDLY giving to Bernie Madoff (ie.. should we blame madoff, or should we allow those who blindly gave to him, so desperate to get rich quick, that they never checked on their own funds?).
 
But, this was not all. The control of the radio airwaves, newspapers, and even hollywood was rampant. Government had learned their lesson well - propoganda, propoganda, propoganda. And, the new technologies coming out were 'exciting' to people. While they were developing stealth bombers in 1945 and installing partical accelerators using technology eons in advance of what the people had seen in their homes, the idea of a 'radio wave' and now, a 'television,' had sparked everyone's minds! By 1960 - the U.S. GPS satellite system would be in place. By 1950 - televisions would be considered a 'standard' in households. Media was injected at all levels of life, using hollywood and movie theaters to define the 'wealth' status of individuals by what they owned: bigger and better cars, bigger and better gadgets, and men who 'loved' their women, made sure to have all these things. Meanwhile, work on inventions such as the 'electric car', had been quietly subdued by the controlling Capitalists (which, by the mid to end of the war included many members of Legislature), to ensure their investments in oil and other such markets would go unchallenged. We were SO blinded by victory (which truly, was NOT ours to celebrate), greed and what appeared to be a promise of a great tomorrow, that we just ignored everything going on in the background.
 
Nobody noticed that America, determined to be the center of the world's economy, had set up the new, international center of peace, in Japan, right where we had dropped an atomic bomb. Nobody noticed that we had spent hundreds and hundreds of millions (equivalent to almost a trillion today), to turn our so-called, 'communist adversaries,' into the center of the world's peace meetings. Nobody noticed that the history books incorrectly recorded multiple concentration camps with gas chambers, or falsely recorded the number of camps raided by American troops. Hollywood, feeding on the greed, the unions, the wealth (and, noteably - being fed larger sums of money than ANYONE else... also going unnoticed by the people), and whatnot, began to prepare themselves to be interjected into daily television where they would continue to burn the WWII torch LONG after it ended. The stories of soldiers who died in the war would go hidden for many years (until even more recently, when we could look upon it with the apathy we have today), and in the wake of segregation's end, the government, wanting to profit from that, too, would develop a national holiday for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (a scholarly gentleman and amazing individual who I admire greatly), while all the time slowly pulling back his message of "equality," and developing a 'new' type of segregation, pitting colors and races against one another.
 
What was the result of this turning point:
 
1. No longer would gvt. need to rely on the people for support, since capitalism cleared the road ahead. Laws could be passed FOR the "people", all the while containing special interest inclusions, never informing the people of the consequences.
2. Military could develop whatever they wanted - their budgets were unrestricted and they could create weapons of death... and as we shared that technology - the need to create MORE of them to maintain a 'balance of power', would necessitate a greater lack of restrictions on the military/government spending.
3. Bailouts of corporate companies, such as American Motors, proved the FDIC's control of the banks, the economy, and peoples' lives. What appeared to be good for the people in the way of unions and private capital had been usurped by privatized, government agencies, and people were not prospering as well as they thought... the capitalists... the banks... (in bed with gvt), had to step in and take control - they were now the 'heroes'
4. People like hugh hefner found that morality in the country had reached an all-time low, the irrational actions of the 'troops' and their 'women' helped encourage an industry that would soon expand into dangerous territory. Mind you - there were other magazines before - but as the government went from full control of the media to partial control after the war, many restrictions had been lifted, and the FCC had not taken full control yet - not with capitalists still in control. (this is further exemplified by the birth rate increase in new york due to the 1965 blackout...)
5. Controlling the media when people were scared may have been easy before, but controlling it when you're filling their pockets was easier still! Subliminal advertising quickly took the place of propoganda (Which was, in and of itself, a blatant abuse of 'subliminal' advertising'), and both the government and media quickly understood their power. Even the 'FCC', wouldn't be exposed as an agency that had been accepting private monies to look the other way until the last several years.
 
Generally, so much happened during this period of time in the way of revolution and change, that it's hard to narrow it all down. However, what is clear is that:
 
War no longer meant something. We didn't fight for "our" freedom, or to support "our" allies, we fought when it benefitted us.....
 
People were not eager to go out and kill, but like sheep, could be easily led to the other side of the hill if the grass is "greener"....
 
Government could openly commit acts in contrast to the people, but now learned that it was just easier to keep the people blind and do what it wanted in the background, such as hiding their budgets through 'creative' finance.
 
A larger, domestic police force was needed to help the people feel 'safe,' - or supposedly so since the government had been instrumental in helping them 'not feel safe'.
 
The political administration, the office of the President, was not a position subservient to the people - and neither was Congress. Their power and their control had become absolute. The country's gold had been consolidated, its communications put under an umbrella of watchfulness, and as long as the people were kept 'appeased,' the gvt could pretty much do what they wanted...
 
But folks, capitalism is not a governmental agency that is destined to survive....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Strange Bedfellows: Capitalism and Democracy

     There is a false belief that Capitalism begets Democracy. This belief is based on the principals that growing nations (currently, what we see as Asian, third world countries such as singapore, and even larger countries such as russia), will create a 'middle class,' whereby the class system will demand greater freedoms and rights leading to a Democracy. While this may appear, at face value to hold some validity, in practice, it is not a reasonable belief. Democracy has never been based on a class system. The foundations of Democracy rely entirely on a representation of the masses, from rich to poor. Democratic decisions which favor one class over the other, or garnish the votes of one class over the other, do not represent the principals of Democracy.

      Take for instance, the recent law (in Oregon), where insurance companies were no longer to be allowed the right to use credit reports to offer some people discounts, and would have to stop discriminating against others. Had this been a Democracy, the bill would have passed unquestioned because that meant a fair system of cost for each person, and qualifications for increases to insurance would be based on a historical basis, putting all people into the same, level, playing field. That is equality and fairness in its purest example. Instead, it was voted down by a majority of voters. These voters were discovered to be the wealthier class. In fact, commercials were broadcast prior to the election that spouted lies, supported by the wealthier individuals of this State claiming that it put an unfair burden on the wealthy to share the overall burdens of insurance costs. What was not stated, was that their discounts, rely upon the poor to pick up the slack and be burdened with the costs that the wealthy don't have to pay. One politician sought to endorse Democracy and make this a level playing field, while private enterprise commanded the results of the election. Looking to third world countries such as Singapore and India, an other countries we mustn't forget several facts:

That the funding of additional education for their youth has come from American, tax-payer dollars, and it is we, not they, who have sacrificed the education of our own children to send 100's of millions of dollars to students overseas to fund their education. 
  1. It is contracts made with American Companies that undercut the American payroll to offer a far, lower rate to the overseas people (such as call center help for Dell, or loan callback agents with First Union Bank); whereby the companies offering overseas jobs qualify as the grant winners of monies that come from tax-payer dollars. 
  2. Other countries such as England and France which exist in a capitalist-type economy don't have a Democracy, but operate under Kings, Queens and a parliamental system.
Others make excuses for capitalism, such as the following excerpt:

Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.

This definition goes only so far in varying, economic conditions. One example is that it works up until the point that taxation leads to the prevention of ownerships of property such as taxation creates a, 'rental,' situation in which property can be taken by the government should one fail to pay their taxes; and morality is sacrificed. I refer to this article by Andrew P, written for EnergyGrid, in which Democracy is placed in its proper context:

It is very easy to assume, because every few years we vote for our choice of government, that we live in a Democracy. After all, the definition of Democracy is a form of society in which the supreme power is vested collectively in the people, and this is primarily exercised by free choice of government. But, although the form of our society still seems democratic, and although we still go through all the same democratic rituals, there is a very worrying trend of power migrating from the people to big business. Democracy is eroding as our leaders, more concerned about controlling society and pleasing their paymasters - the corporations - turn their backs on the interests of ordinary people. (read the rest here)

       The main component of Capitalism that challenges Democracy is: Wealth. Capitalism is the system whereby each and every person may work toward the goal of bettering themselves financially for the purpose of moving up in social and financial status. The underlying, human mechanism that poisons this growth is known as greed. Wealth is not obtained through the fabrication of resources from thin air, but from the work done by one class to support another class. And, as the scales tip downward for the rich, they tip upward for the poor. Democracy is born not from Capitalism creating a middle class that demands their fair share, but perhaps it is better stated to be a by-product of Capitalism due to a greater separation of socio-economic classes in which enough of the poor, demanding fair representation, must be heard due to overwhelming numbers. Democracy is not born from an economy, but war. However, in their purest forms, one cannot exist with the other. Capitalism which can be governed by greed, exist as a socialist standard or a bartering system without a government, cannot support a standard of equal rights for all individuals.

      In the beginning of the USA, maybe it appears as if Democracy's roots were embedded in the principals of a trade/barter system. However, do not forget that it was greed and selfishness that brought us to this country, took the land away from its native inhabitants, and then relied on slavery and endentured servitude to lay the foundation for American economics. Democracy is doomed to fail in the presence of Capitalism. This happens when the private corporations of America mold the lawmaking process and when the Government no longer represents the masses or protects their interests, but creates punishments that lead to the wealth of the Government. For example, the seat belt law: This law does not affect anyone else. A person is not a better or worse driver or a greater or lesser risk to others because they do or do not wear, a seatbelt (the argument, everytime against those who disagree with me - is busses; especially, schoolbusses). The law is nothing more than the Government abusing its power to increase income. Yes, I know the argument that it is far more expensive for the taxpayers when a person is hurt without a seatbelt and more resources have to be spent transporting that person. What I don't buy in that story, is why 16 cop cars arrived for one person hitting another, one ambulence, two tow trucks, and 10 of the 16 officers standing around and doing nothing for the entirety of the accident. Money is wasted and it is a Capitalist-type law. When the government makes laws that support the 3 credit reporting bureaus and checksystems as methods to control an individual's life (their job, ability to have shelter, food, transportation and many, other factors); and leave it in the hands of private enterprise, thereby endorsing that we [the people of America], are to answer to private corporations who thrive on their lust for wealth, then the money makes the rules - and America Government is now acting, Capitalist.

      It is a growing concern, nationwide, that our Government is moving farther and farther away from the people. That their political campaigns are skewed and poorly done, that it's become obvious that they are merely for show, to hide the truth behind them. No true Democracy can survive, for those who seek wealth, seek power. They know that power will further endorse their wealth. Thus, those who have gotten into positions of political power in this country are either corrupted, or will be soon.... The two opposites do not make for very good bedfellows. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »