Posted by
CyberMom on Monday, May 18, 2009 2:47:50 PM
Yes, Nancy Pelosi is the victim of her own moral standards. She was not meant for politics. In fact, I feel quite bad for Ms. Pelosi at the moment in time and wish there was some way I could help her. And, yet, with all she's done that has been egregious toward the people of this Country, it's a fact that she is at the receiving end of what she helped contribute to. Why? More of her outrageous commentary? No - in fact - it's because she's finally being honest. She's finally telling people the truth, and now, nobody will believe the little boy who cried wolf....
You see, Ms. Pelosi did NOT lie when she said that members of our 'intelligence' agencies (the CIA, the FBI, Internal Affairs, etc.) lie to Congress. When Newt Gingrich, ex Speaker of the House, spoke on the Sean Hannity show saying that Nancy Pelosi was undermining and attacking the innocent and pure "intelligence" agencies of this country and berated her, HE LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Why? How? Because - If - IF - Nancy Pelosi is telling the truth, then guess what? That means that old Newt knew the truth as well. In fact, it is HIS integrity that is on the line, not the integrity of our "intelligence," agencies. Quite frankly, the words government and intelligence are not only oxymorons, but rather strange bedfellows. What really makes this a 'major' issue that has unleashed such a horrid attack on Nancy Pelosi (and for those of you desensitized to the media - the attacks are outrageously extreme in comparison to ANYTHING else going on right now), is that it also puts 'Ex-Senator,' Mr. Barrack Obama, the current President - on the line for also knowing the truth about the lies AND contributing to it. You see - there's evidence. Not just the Guantanamo Bay garbage, but SO much more -
(I'll reflect on only a select 2 or 3 topics in this paper - as the FULL list would take a lifetime to present to you)
When the
Adam Walsh Act was initiated, its intentions seemed to be in support of the need to protect our children. However, there is a very dark and underlying agenda to this act. The
American Prosecutor's Journal published a "guide" to understanding the Adam Walsh Act. It includes statements such as: "Prosecutors will find some very helpful language contained in the Congressional Findings..." and "Discoveries are not final appeable Orders," et. al. What does all that refer to? It refers to the prosecutors of this country, the D.A.'s that I wrote about previously who supposedly "support the Constitution," in full, relying on language in that bill that allows them to circumvent the Constitutional right for a Defendant to have access to all of the accusatory witnesses and accusatory instruments to be used against him or her. In fact, it outright limited and diminished the ability of any defense attorney to provide a Constitutionally adequate and sufficient defense. Of course, prosecutors love this. They are no longer bound by Constitutional laws protecting everyone. Don't misunderstand - you soccer mom, paranoid schizophrenics of the world out there - we're not talking about the rights of the guilty - only the accused. What's the difference? While you may be so insensitive that you don't care if a person's guilty or accused - you find guilt in everyone - like the good, God-fearing, loving, American you are...... what should scare the living crud out of you is that an innocent person no longer has the right to prove their innocence - and the guilty one continues to stalk the streets - and OUR children. Sorry, but unlike the ignorant masses of this country - I want the GUILTY person caught - because I can either accept that someone's potential innocence leaves a potentially guilty person walking free, or I can understand that jailing the wrong person (beyond our tax dollars going up), means the guilty ARE walking free!! BIG distinction. A chance and a risk I am willing to take, is to allow someone freedom to represent their FULL innocence, so I can make sure that guilty person is still not walking around, unknown and free.
What does this have to do with Congress and intelligence agencies lying? They lie, and they use security officials, "intelligence" agencies to do so. One of the very first court cases (I forget the reference - I apologize) to occur following the institution of this act brought to light the fact that Congress declared hard disks inaccessible to defense experts at their place of business because they wanted to prevent the spread of such materials. However - as the Judge found out - NO such thing has ever occurred. And, he would not uphold a standard in his courtroom upon which lies predicated Congress' decision. You can read
Dean Boland's technology blog to see for yourself additional violations of Congressional trust:
(2/26/09) "Although a study was released last month by the Internet Safety Technical Task Force that reported a safer Internet than parents and others had imagined. Nevertheless, two politicians from Texas, Jon Cornyn and Lamar Smith, have each filed in the senate and house, respectively, their own versions of the Internet Safety Act, otherwise known as Internet Stopping Adults Facilitating the Exploitation of Today's Youth Act."
So - hold up - the ISTTF reported the internet's quite safe these days. So, what did these other two politicians do? They promoted free wire-tapping and forcing ISP's to keep permanent IP records of everyone. The consequences? IP records DON'T identify a person (go ahead google that phrase and see what you find). However, based on false information that is being presented to Congress - stop - go back - re-read "FALSE INFORMATION" - Congress must pass a law. Based on the presentation of the FBI to Congress that there is a risk of data loss if hard drives are given to defense, forensic experts, Congress must pass a law. Where's the "two-sides," to these arguments? Where's the Constitutionality? Well.. on that matter... I digress. Because, what's important here is evidence that "intelligence" sources have and ARE continuing to misrepresent data to Congress, falsely, and are causing laws to be irrationally initiated. So, where does the President/ex-Senator fit in? Mr. Obama claims his place of infamy in the "Protect Our Children First Act," which expanded upon the Adam Walsh Acts I & II, and further supported DHS' continuing removal of children from homes - even where children were never harmed, were quite safe and happy - and placing them into homes where they are lost, afraid and oft times are raped or abused (and in rare instances murdered).
Did our President want this? No, I don't believe he did. I believe he thought he was doing what was right based on the false information presented to him by DHS and federal authorities (who compiled false data from local law enforcement agencies), that allowed him to stir up Congress and win a feather in his cap for future elections.
But, when Governments lie - we suffer. Now, Nancy Pelosi, who has tried to tell the American public that lies were presented to Congress and Congress acted upon false information, initiating extreme actions that are potentially harmful in every way with every grain of cruelty and abuse that is Anti-American and UnConstitutional, is facing losing her job, her career, her credibility and so much more. Ms. Pelosi is trying to tell people the truth - but when the little boy who cries wolf does it over and over again, soon, no one will believe them. Well, Ms. Pelosi, as much as I am NOT in support of you maintaining your position in politics (unless you have learned something and will begin to sing a different tune), I do believe you and feel for you. I believe you - because the facts are out there. But, Congress doesn't want to be defaced. Newt Gingrich is scrambling to cover his tail in the wake of publishing his new book. The President doesn't need another bad mark on his record. So - you're the fall guy (or, er, um.. gal.. hee hee). You're the whipping boy, the scapegoat... the bobo doll! You are - at the receiving end of all the wild and outrageous verbal commentary you threw out against the American people.
But, I fear that no one else will believe you. People believe their televisions. The pendulum swings in one direction, then the other - people go from one extreme to the other, and it takes a while to come back and yet, the pendulum does not stop in the middle. I'm afraid that no one but I, will defend you right now - and I am fairly right wing (surprisingly.. hmm?). I'm afraid that no one will aide you but me, right now, because you've not won the popular vote. You've not convinced the sheep they're in trouble. The sheep go where they're told, and trust what they're told. The little boy who cried wolf is the same one who lead his sheep to the slaughter. And, Ms. Pelosi - the sheep who are ignoring the truth about what you're telling them - will be lead to the slaughter. THEY WILL SUFFER, because of what you've done and what is happening now. They will NOT see the wolf coming, nor will anyone come to their aide. What you are now faced with is the devastation that a few misplaced, mistimed and unweighed words will have on the lives of the American people. The "intelligence" agencies will continue to lie. Congress will continue to issue out outrageous and uncalculated laws. Congress will violate the very Constitution of this country to initiate a witch hunt in the traditional style of the late 17th century and innocents will burn. But, only those who are sitting in are awaiting our cages, so that we may be held underwater for an hour to see if we come up breathing and are truly the witch we're accused of being, know the truth. And, we've been quieted. Nobody reads our work. Nobody listens to us. We have been defamed under false pretenses so that we no longer interrupt the wolf's feeding session.
And, now you know how it feels. Sorry -wish I could do more. Wish I knew how. Not solely to protect you - but mainly to protect the people.