About Me

Name: CyberMom
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! pt. 1

[This is a 4-part article covering the recent news coverage on the Health Care reform package and is not comprehensive on ALL the issues. If you read this through to the end, you will see that I list a course of action to take to help put a stop to this bill, and explain throughout, why it should be stopped and under what misleading pretenses the Left is attempting to push this through!] 

Yes, President Obama will be bringing forth his pitch for health care reform to the people once again, this time, in a State suffering from tremendously high levels of uninsured citizens. And, yes, YOU, the people, will once again be given an opportunity to hear the, "real," issues and put forth your voices! Once again, we the people, of this Democracy known as the United States of America, shall be empowered once more!
 
Oh wait... wrong story. I forgot, we get NO say in this - at all. It's now: "Obama vs. Congress vs. the People," and he wants to pressure leaders in Congress to go along with his plan (at least the 60 or so who are still standing up to him), or otherwise, appear as the, "bad guys," in front of the people and not get voted in next year (while he retains his office for another 3 years). Sorry - my bad - I apologize in advance. I, 'sort of,' forgot that it's not about the people or what we want, but using scare tactics and lies to force the people into drastic action - like sheep - for the politicians. Sort of reminiscent of those by-gone days, where the ancient Greek Gods would war with one another, and the people were just their pawns and in their way. Funny, I thought America was a country of people, not politicians - I guess that's just not the case - but I digress.
 
The reform will now cut the budget from the apparently, current cost of $2.4 trillion down to a mere, $900 billion, will take away the impositions against businesses to force-fund the program and relieve those with insurance from added tax debts. Additionally, it will increase the number of people covered to 95%, eliminating things like, 'pre-existing,' conditions, and co-pays for 'basic,' services; eliminate 'government run health care and create co-ops for the people to decide, while easing the tax burdens on the wealthy.

Yeah - hah - hahahahaha - no... wait for it.... wait.... yep - hahahahahaha! Okay - let's weed through this, shall we? Bloomberg AP News reports: Health care as it is now is getting really, REALLY expensive. If the government doesn't curb it - it's going to bankrupt the people!! But, some don't agree - they think the health care reform posed by Obama will cause a greater deficit and hurt the people more. Okay... sounds reasonable - two sides to the argument, right? The Hill reports: that the currently proposed reform to Obama's plan, being headed up by Senator Baucus(D), will reduce the costs to $900 billion, maintain 95% coverage (except to 'undocumented,' illegal aliens... vs. the 'documented,' illegal aliens who WILL be covered), and reduce the national deficit over a 10-year period. Senator Konrad (D) stated that he knows of 12 million people that are already positioned to sign up for co-op run plans! And, a committee will be established to find additional ways to cap medicare pay-outs and spending, in addition to the billions in cuts proposed, to help reduce the national deficit! Medical News Today reported that: the cut in spending on 'undocumented,' immigrants, makes up about 98% of the 50 million who would not be covered by this health care reform (47 mil). The [May] article in Medical News Today also quoted Sen. Baucus as saying that he is opting for business paid health exchange and a government run health care option. Senator John Kerry (D) stated that taxing the rich is senseless as it raises too little money, but you can't tax the working class because that would interefere in business success.

This blogroll on the ABC News website discussed the amazing fact that Congress is now seeking public congrats for having actually read Obama's health reform bill. My Central Oregon.com reports that: dependent coverage will be extended to age 26, a removal for 'denial,' of pre existing conditions for insurance, policies with premiums paid in full must be renewed, and gender biases would be stopped. Lawmakers will knock an additional $35 million out of medicare to help lessen the overall expense of this reform, and, the uninsured won't begin to see changes until 2013, with full coverage to those uninsured not being realized until 2018.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! pt. 2

  Now - with ALL that said - with all those issues laid out before you - the people who get to decide (no.. not vote.. don't be silly, this is America! We don't vote here! We just push Congress and threaten them with their jobs and not voting for them because we're a Democracy, duhh!!), let's break this down to REALITY:

1. The current cost of $2.4 trillion will be lessened to $900 billion. FACT: If you READ the article, you might notice that it is the current population of America, WITH health insurance, paying that $2.4 trillion - not Uncle Sam. Their health care reform is supposed to somehow lessen YOUR direct costs, while funny enough - the media/White House keeps reporting that we should be concerned about this health care reform because of the 'costs,' that will have to be charged in taxes. So.. wait? Are they lowering your $2.4 trillion by paying for the $2,399,100,000,000 ($2.39 trillion) in tax dollars? How does that 'offset,' your costs? Are they going to 'force,' health insurance companies into charging less? I suppose that's where their 'incentives,' options come in - but those incentives options STILL include our taxes - so, somehow, I think we've got the White House intentionally mixing apples with oranges and confuse the issues to make YOU think like they're lowering the overall tax deficit - when that's NOT true. So, were two sides of the story reported on? Those who think this will increase the deficit and those who don't? Yep - but the bridge between the two realities of a $2.4 trillion dollar, consumer-paid, private insurance bill and a $900 billion dollar government funding plan - was not gapped. In fact, when you listen to Obama talk, he refers to the previous administration (Republican), as being responsible for your $2.4 trillion dollar price tag on insurance and how he, as a (Democrat), will curb that. Sad as it is - he's not only trying to confuse the two issues, the President, and several others in Washington, are using the confusion as a battle-ground!!??

2. A Co-Op insurance option. A co-op was suggested at a government-paid (ahem.. tax payer paid) price-tag $6 billion. THAT would be on of those 'gaps,' that needs crossing. Have you ever HAD a co-op or been in a co-op, like a CC&R or power company? Is there any great 'savings,' there? I'm not talking the 'amount,' of the bill - I'm talking about the savings - because it doesn't exist. So, there's your $2.4 trillion, with an additional tax deficit of $6 billion on top of it already!

3. Eliminating 'pre existing conditions,' as ground for denial. Well, if you'll read about pre existing conditions and insurance as they currently stand, you'll see the 'real,' problem isn't denial - it's the added costs to those with this issue. And, in fact, when you read through the articles in the last post, you'll see that little, 'one-liner,' note in there. This bill does NOT deal with the current problem of added costs for pre existing conditions. In fact, this is a worthless addition to the bill designed to be propoganda intended to 'distract,' you.

4. No co-pays for basic services. Yes, that's right. For mammograms, check-ups, and other, preventative care visits, you'll pay no co-pay. Of course, that's REALLY going to help curb that increasing insurance premium, right? After all - no copays means the insurance company picks up the ENTIRE tab, right? HAHAHAHA - sure - that'll lessen your premiums.

5. Covering 95% of the uninsured. Yes, I know I detailed this in part already, but I'll repeat it here because... it's funny! Senator Baucus, seemingly the new spokesperson for this 'sub-reform-reform,' has stated that it's Washington's belief that they can cover up to 95% of the people who are currently uninusured! But, they're still working on a way to handle the undocumented illegal immigrants, because they won't be covered. So - 50 million by this new reform (seemingly, the 5% who won't be covered by the reform), consists of: 47 million undocumented, illegal immigrants. Forgive me if my math is wrong, but that means that 94% of the people who won't be covered by this health care extension include the 'undocumented,' illegal immigrants who will already NOT be covered by this health care plan, while the 6% may... or may not... include the 'documented,' illegal immigrants. Maybe I'm just stretching here.. but the current 95% coverage WILL cover the documented, illegal immigrants... who are, "illegal," and the 6% not covered will be American Citizens, that as Sen. Baucus states: are amongst those you can "always find," who won't qualify under this new plan. Aren't we back to apples and oranges and misleading information again? Isn't this 95% coverage for uninsured folks, talking about only leaving out, for the most part, undocumented, illegal immigrants? How much of a 'stretch,' is that - in reality?

Hmm... somehow, this still seems a bit shady. I think there's something more to this story, don't you?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! pt. 3

(continuing on from the last post)

6. Senator Kerry (D), has emphasized his support of not taxing the wealthy, because that would just not cover the bill. Wait? didn't we just go over the 'bill,' and the $2.4 trillion consumer paid vs. the $900 billion government paid? Sorry.. my head's spinning. Listening to the left spin their garbage out of Congress and into the streets can do that sometimes. Inversely, Sen. Kerry wants us to be careful about lowering the tax bracket of who pays for this bill too far, becasue we could interefere with employer businesses if the lower-class have to start paying. That is to say, he supports taxing the businesses, but if we tax the people and the businesses who can no longer afford to keep people on staff because of their dramatic increases in taxes per person, we'd be double taxing and inevitably causing an increase in unemployment. Oops.. I meant.. he 'inferred,' that - he didn't say it. My bad. Of course - he and Senator Konrad plan on supporting co-ops because white house studies show 12 million people currently in support of it. What 12 million people? What sector? It seems to me that if we shouldn't "lower," that tax bracket too far - that the 'lower,' tax bracket will NOT be the ones supporting the co-ops. (As a side note - let's also not forget many of these Senators are in that wealthy tax bracket who will pay out... AND... they are business owners - which it sounds like Sen. Kerry has covered his backside on both issues!).

7. Insurance companies who have been paid must provide insurance! Well, THIS was an awesome addition to the bill, don't you think? After all, this hits right to the heart of the issue, doesn't it? Okay, sarcasm aside - yes - THIS is a DISTRACTION, that out of 4,000 pages, was NOT newsworthy, but it's what the Congress and White House offered the people. Sure - they've read the bill. Was it to show the American people that they care and necessary to help 'sell,' the bill? No, and yes. It wasn't to show they cared, it was to find out what 'highlights,' they could offer the media and the public to 'appease,' us, while not discussing the 'other,' major issues.

8. Uninsured will begin receiving coverage in 2013! Yes, AFTER the next election. What a WONDERFUL way to wrap people up into voting for... well.. not those 'horrifying,' Republicans that opposed this bill! After all - you're all about to receive benefits thanks to Obama and the Democratic party! Do you really, REALLY, want to vote Republican and give ALL that up? Sure... and not everyone gets benefits until 2018. What a way to REALLY play this issue out. Didn't see it, yet? Let me 'splain: This $900 billion to be spent, will be "drug," out - including medicare payouts and the currently existing medicare program, to not really 'work,' until mid 2015. That means, that it will only cost about $450 billion by then (yes - assuming those numbers were accurate - which they aren't). That way, come election time, it looks like they've been saving the budget because the deficit's not as high, and JUST LIKE THE STIMULUS, they've "issued," the monies - but NOT spent the monies - and so they haven't had to "dramatically," raise taxes. Instead, the increase will be slow and steady over time where it won't "really," be felt for 5 or 6 more years and you won't "really," feel that pinch until then. But, make no mistake: If you buy something for $1000.00 - you OWE a $1000.00. AND - if you SPAN out your amortization on the "loan," you took out to buy that item, your interest will be HIGHER! So - that $1000, rather than costing $1400 in a 3 or 4 year payoff, will cost $2000 in the 6 year payoff, but by the third/fourth year, you will have only "seen," a $1,000 go out the door - and it will look GREAT on paper! Anyone who's EVER leased ANYTHING - will know about this - whether your lease was great or a pain. It's basic math, it's deceptive - it's LYING! YOU'RE going to PAY MORE - so THEY can look LESS like bad guys they really are! I'll remind you of this in 2012, if I'm still around - when this comes true.

9. Medicare cuts and caps will help curb the $2.4 trillion to $900 billion. I've saved this "special," issue for the end for a very, good reason: Medicare cuts of $35 million dollars, 'squeezing,' the system "after" they've cut billions out of it that well.. you know.. pay no attention to the man behind the curtain... ANYWAY - the committee (that will cost us), to arrange these cuts, will save us $2.39 trillion dollars! YAY!! Um... wait.. wasn't that $2.4 trillion what people currently, privately pay for insurance and has nothing to do with government spending? How will $35 million save $2.39 trillion? How will $35 million in addition to hundreds of billions, save $2.39 trillion? HOW WILL CUTTING Medicare INCREASE fair insurance to everyone?

Hold on - something's not right? (see why I saved this one?) Holy Medicare Premiums Batman - the math isn't working??!! Neither is the logic.. boy wonder!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! finale

Guess what? If you've been reading this little series on the current news media and reports from Washington on Health Care, you "might," be hanging onto your head.. or at least your seat right now, trying to understand what just happened to you.
 
Congress 'READ,' the Bill! They put their hard time and effort into it just for you! They did it so that they could either increase their ability to 'sell,' you on it, or raise concerns to Legislature that will really, really hit home and make sure this is the right bill for us.
 
Yeah... and I'm actually a good writer. HAHAHAHAHA.
 
Let's be real:
In May of 2009, Senator Baucus, the now self-proclaimed spokesperson for this bill and the leader of the sub-reform reform bill intended to sway the rest of Congress, said: We need businesses to bear this burden! We need an insurance health exchange! We need a government-run health care option!
 
Today, Senator Baucus - the same one - who is supposedly "reforming," the health care bill, is saying: we shouldn't burden businesses. What health exchange? Let's do a co-op! And, don't be silly, a government run health care option would be pointless. Don't worry, I'll make sure that 95% of the people without insurance get it!
 
Thank goodness. Thank goodness that a man who has consistency, integrity, honesty and high-moral values is in charge of our reform. Thank goodness Obama's going to a state to speak to people suffering without health insurance to pass his bill. And, thank goodness everyone in Congress took the time to read that 4,000 page bill, because they were told to vote before their "1-month, vacation," which has now been postponed until September - in which they'll do NOTHING during August.
 
Yechth! Sorry - have to wash out my mouth for spitting out all that garbage! Folks, I've made brief references to the health care bill, explaining the current system needs reformed and the logistics behind that. However, the Democrats (and again, I hate taking "sides," but this IS what THEY are doing under President Obama), are now saying: Look - see how much more expensive this is getting by waiting? And, they're now going to wait another month. Why? So they can JACK UP that $900 billion price tag. They're saying that if we don't act "fast," and vote ASAP - that $2.4 trillion current expense will skyrocket! And, guess what - if the reform bill's NOT passed by Congress - Obama, in his special, "private," meetings with AARP, will make sure it HAPPENS! The pressure's on. It's Obama's signature move. It's what he does. He goes to the people so YOU feel empowered, getting you to pressure Congress - to institute a bill which will devastate us - proving that we were NEVER empowered in the first place!
 
Squeezing medicare costs? Capping medicare payouts? Sure - that'll work. That'll put a hefty burden on medicare patients. And, what about this $335 - $445 billion dollar cut in medicare that's supposed to "lessen," the $2.4 trillion to $900 billion? Oops.. sorry - I'm mixing the same apples and oranges Congress did. Don't want to play that: MISLEAD YOU AND LIE TO YOU game they're playing. Instead, let's address the fact that: they are now talking about preserving your health care rights. So - your $2.4 trillion that is increasing - will continue to increase! Your insurance premiums WILL rise. Why? Well - we're 'capping,' the insurance companies, aren't we? We're controlling 'gender,' biases (which is unlawful in the first place), aren't we? Sure we are - now the gender that insurance thinks is at higher risk can be insured - but it will cost you more. The 26 year old kid's going to cost you more. The lack of co-pays is going to cost you more. The addition of pre-existing/high risk patients will cost you more. The lack of lifetime caps will cost you more. It's impossible NOT to! These are the SAME, EMPTY promises Obama made during his campaign!
 
I'm going to give you more, give you this, give you that, cut spending in half, and everything's going to be peachy-keen! Are we THAT stupid? *sigh - don't answer... - we know the answer* You can't CAP insurance companies, lessen their rates, and expect them to provide MORE? In truth - what we should be REALLY inflamed about, is that Congress has now claimed to read this bill, and yet, they haven't provided us with answers to explain a drop from $2.4 trillion to $900 billion (yes, apples and oranges - but since they've said it - explain how this 'drop,' in the deficit will occur?). And, uninsured people who get sick or need medicine NOW - CAN'T wait until 2013 when THEY'RE going to be covered.
 
Hold on - when "they're," going to be covered? I thought Senator Baucus said: No, to government run health care and that private insurance will remain as is with you getting to pay your own bills as it is now? What's this $900 billion for, then? It's not ALL for the 2013 - 2018, 5-year period of covering the uninsured. Is he, lying? Perhaps even, misleading us? Are we getting 6 pages out of the 4,000? YES! The answer to ALL those questions is: YES.
 
What to do now? "Now's the time for all good men (and women), to come to the aide of their country!" (Charles E. Weller).
 
Yes - head to the typewriter, the pen and paper - the computer if you must - but get going! Don't just tell Congress - "No - or I'll vote you out of office," tell them: "NO - AND IF YOU DON'T STOP LYING I'M GOING TO VOTE YOU OUT OF OFFICE AND CONTACT THE SUPREME COURT AND ASK WHAT I NEED TO DO TO IMPEACH YOU FOR LYING TO ME."
 
Okay - a little, "brash," perhaps, but I'll let you refine it however you feel is necessary. Now is the time for action. Now is the time for all of us to stand. You cannot implement government mandated health care controls and restrictions without also making it a 'government,' run, health care system. You cannot determine (in advance), the appropriate and only acceptable treatments for medical problems that doctors may implement or choose from, without making it a government-run medical program. However they're trying to 're-label,' what they're doing, Senator Baucus, in his hopefulness that we're all too stupid to think for ourselves, has done us a favor. You see, he raised the issues in 100% support of Obama, waited for the public outcry and what seemed to be our dilemma, then strategically helped partake in a very well organized plan to 'rework,' the reform to appear as something different while still supporting Obama 100%. He played the propaganda game to the hilt - and if alone - I'd liken him to the skills of Winston Churchill. However, if you don't see it yet, I'll just lightly present this to you: if he's not alone and only a patsy in the bigger scheme of what's going on: the entire Democratic party has run one of history's greatest campaigns since World War II. But, I'll let you decipher that for yourselves. Thanks - and God Bless you all!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Economic forecast follow-up... again

UPDATE** (especially for Donnie) - yup - housing starts SOARED 11% - so obviously - we're getting all better, right? Hmm.. check this out:
 
While Washington reports a soar in housing starts, from the other side of America, I report this: privately owned housing unit building permits were 8.7% up in June from May, 2009 - but 52% lower than June 2008. Privately owned housing starts in June were up 3.6% above May (this is that 11.3% referred to by Washington), but are 46% BELOW June 2008. Housing completions were 4% below the May, 2009 numbers, and 27.7% below the June numbers. But, the single-family housing completions were 8.9% above May's figures!! Although... in buildings with five or more units (you know - apartments, townhomes, etc.), were more than half that number.
 
Just remember - "privately owned housing rates," = single family dwelling all by itself. Single family housing rates = apartment. And, don't forget, with the bottom falling out on the housing market, and the interest rates cheaper - "why" those people who have the funds to do so are building new homes!! (Do I really, REALLY have to explain this? Please say no...). And, don't forget why people are moving out of their "privately," owned homes into townhouses/apartments - because they're broke! And, no, I'm sorry to report, that Government Motors.. erm, um, I mean, GM & Chrysler are not doing too well. The cash for clunkers program? Well, check this out:
 
"Cash for clunkers will end Nov. 1 or when the $1 billion in subsidies expire, whichever occurs first. Congress must decide later this year whether to approve legislation extending it into 2010."
 
Want a little feedback on what that really means? AAA reports that as of 2008, there are 230 - 250 million cars on the American roadways. Let's see, at $4,500 a piece (oops.. reread that statement.. as MUCH as $4500 a piece... hmmm...), that's about $1.125 trillion dollars. Or.. about 8.8 x 10 to the negative fourth PERCENT of the total cost for everyone to trade in their cars. (yes... less than 1%). So.. till November 1st or when the $1 billion runs out. Sounds like a push... sounds like someone trying to "force," people into cars without reading all the writing. Wait.. wait a second... hold on? Isn't that what Obama's doing with the... you know.. Health Care bill? Wow... guess what!? He knows how to just get things into place without giving people a chance to see what he's really doing!! So - I suppose there'a a GOOD reason that the "cash for clunkers," program, is NOT stimulating American consumer confidence....
 
And, yes, unemployment rates continue to remain DRAMATICALLY low - but - what does that mean? How long has the Bureau of Labor Statistics been recording job rates vs. unemployment rates? Well, in 1935, of course, in RESPONSE, to the Great Depression. That means, BOLI, has about 74 years of statistics - although - we can probably imagine, those first ten to twenty years were absolute turmoil and we don't "really," know. That, of course, doesn't account for the fact that not every State jumped on board immediately - and - oh yeah - unemployment statistics only account for those CLAIMING it - not those whose claims have expired! And, finally, if you've read the EIA's statistics on gas prices, you'd see that since 2007, the prices skyrocketed, then magically plummeted in November of 2008! Well, thank goodness that Obama paved the way for people to drive once more, raising the supply and demand curve! Of course, we shouldn't forget that gas prices are set by analysts "predicting the future!" Yes, that's right - 'analysts,' who have a crystal ball, set the prices for gasoline in response to what's going on. Seeing that America didn't explode, they decided in November - that 'oops,' maybe we went too far. They fell for the Obamamania that struck America. Funny though - gas prices seem to be rising dramatically again? Wouldn't that be in response to the Obamamania going on right now? Of course.. if you look at a much more "thourough," chart,  maybe you too, will decide - this "media," trend of forecasting that everything's getting all better, really is STUPID.
 
Thanks to Donnie for the hilarious input! Yes - we're all better now. Obama's saved us. OPEC is gaining an iron hold on the economy, prices in gas are being driven up, people are refinancing and buying what they can while it's cheap, the wealthy are investing in apartment complexes, planning on families having to give up their homes and unemployment benefits are running out for everyone! Yes!! Things are getting SO much better, SO fast it makes your head spin! Wheee...... (<---that's the political rollercoaster known as "government," and unfortunately for him, Obama's at the front and the Democrats are in tow. But, just like a rollercoaster, don't forget - in the Amusement Park of politics - the one you get on - is the one you stay on - there are no 'alternate,' routes - and you drag the whole of America along with you!!)!
 
Good Luck!
=========================
Original Article below:
=========================
 Well, the media's done it again! Home Mortgage applications are up! That's EVIDENCE that the economy is turning around and people are ready to start buying homes again.
 
Of course... analysts "do" tend to admit, that more than 90% of those mortgage applications are actually refinance applications being done while the interests rates are down. Sort of, takes away the glamour of that whole "economy turning around," thing.. .doesn't it?
 
Maybe it's just me, or that remaining 10% may have something to do with the fact that homes in foreclosure are being sold for a fraction of what they cost - like many here in this area where homes that 'were' $300k and up, can be purchased for as low as $80k? I don't know about you.. I'm just thinking out loud, here! :)
 
Thanks media - you've done it again. Just more evidence of foot in mouth disease. Didn't they recently announce there may be a cure for the swine flu? Maybe they'll work on the "falsely interpreting economic signals and announcing them out of turn, misrepresenting what's really going on," epidemic, next?
 
It's fun to dream....
[huey freeman]
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Truth About Health Care

   Well folks, you can thank Glenn Beck for failing the American public as of this morning, July 23, 2009. In fact, I would go so far as to say he embarrassed the whole of the Republican party this morning. In life, there are some things you can joke about that are funny - there are some assumptions you can make that are generically okay - and setting political correctness aside; there are some empty arguments you can blindly toss out there and it's still okay. But, there are some you can't, and health care IS one that you can't attack empty handed. Barrack Obama told a story about a woman who paid into her health insurance but they refused to pay for her cancer treatments, and a story about a person who lost their job and ended up with an exorbitant debt from a life-saving surgery. All that Beck could focus on, was that we "don't know the cancer woman's whole story," and it's probably her fault, and that the guy who lost his job was too "stupid" (yes, word that Beck used ver batim), to get Cobra. He spent plenty of time making fun of both of them simply because Barrack Obama, rather than dragging out a speech with all the details, gave those two highlighted examples of problems with our health care system. They should have never been the brunt of his jokes because: 1: Insurance companies have had an infamy for refusing services they are supposed to provide and 2: because we don't know that the guy with the debt DIDN'T have Cobra. Ignorance only begets ignorance.
 
The problem? People like Glenn Beck with insurance, who are not disabled and haven't hurt, don't know. Glenn will profess that unless you've been an alcoholic and gone through recovery you can't possibly understand things about that system that he does; and he's right. The same goes for health care. But, those of you listening to his show may be in the same position he is, and rather than weeding through ignorance and getting the truth - you had more ignorance blasted in your face. It is now REALLY upsetting me that EVERY FORM OF MEDIA coverage has seem to "Magically," *poof*, forgotten the stories we've had about the health care system since Obama suggested socialized medicine. Sure, there are plenty of stories of people leaving socialized medicine countries and coming to America so they can get the treatment they need, "in time." How do they get their treatment, by paying for it? NO. They come here, broke, and get their treatment through the: SOCIALIZED portion of health care system as it is now??!! Oops - forgot to mention that when attacking socialized medicine, huh? Did we forget that there are LITERALLY thousands of people, EVERY YEAR, leaving THIS COUNTRY to go to Europe, Canada and OTHER countries to get alternative treatments because our health care system won't provide them? Oops - forgot to mention that little caveat when discussing the "evil," socialized medicine, huh?
 
Have we so quickly forgotten the woman in southern california desperately trying to cross the border to Mexico so that she can get an alternate form of cancer treatment for her 5 year old little boy so that he didn't have to be radiated for cancer because he BEGGED her to save him - but the LAW - the LEGAL SYSTEM - the JUSTICE OF AMERICA - sent the authorities after her, blockading roads, and FORCED her to relinquish her child to the medical community to radiate the CR@P out of him? Did you forget that? Did you forget how the GOVERNMENT ALREADY forced people into treatments they didn't want through fearmongering and absolution of power? Oops... sorry... yeah.. forgot there are just a few, bugs, but only a few, right - isolated stories, right? Well, maybe we've ALL forgotten the young lady in Oregon, who was only in her 20's, that needed a LIFE SAVING SURGERY, but her INSURANCE COMPANY wouldn't authorize it until her family initiated a LAWSUIT, and then, when the insurance company conceeded and gave in to actually having to "spend," money to save someone's life - it was TOO LATE AND SHE %^##$%^#@ DIED! Yeah - um - isn't that the "evil," of "socialized," medicine that the Republicans such as Glenn Beck are professing against? You know, the ones where the government gets to decide what treatments you have or makes you stand in lines until you die? WE are NOT a socialized medicine country and yet we have ALL of the same problems as SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
 
If Socialized medicine was SO BAD, in countries where you get to ELECT your leaders (and America's not the only one people), they STILL don't leave that system. Why not? If it's SO BROKEN, why are we the ONLY country not to use it? from Wikipedia on Socialized Medicine:
 
"Most industrialized countries, and many developing countries, operate some form of publicly-funded health care with universal coverage as the goal. According to the Institute of Medicine and others, the United States is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not provide universal health care."
 
[Note - please be aware that the above does NOT ALSO consider that the issues I raise in this article about the welfare system, and the medical coverage in the Military - considered to be some of the best available - fall within the LIMITED spectrum definition of Socialized Medicine in respect to the way that the radio talk show hosts use the term]
 
Look - I'm not advocating for it - not at all. What I don't like is when people like Glenn Beck go on the radio and talk about how "stupid," some kid was for not getting Cobra, stating that it's a government mandate that businesses offer to you and HE IS WRONG. He obviously hasn't done his homework, which he proclaims so "ADAMANTLY," that he does. You CAN be refused Cobra - including for reasons of termination vs. self-terminition. You CAN be refused Cobra if you're disabled and have a pre-existing condition. Okay - so - I'm gonna let you ALL in on a little secret -
 
I'm disabled. I don't have health insurance. Why? Don't I qualify? Sure I do! Even with a pre-existing condition and HUGE bills, I would qualify. You see, for $215 per month, I could pay for a program that requires only a $15 copay per doctor's visit and a 50% copay on my meds. So, every month, my $150 in prescriptions (that's the minimum - it's much larger but I won't tell you how much), would only cost me $75!! Every three months, seeing my doc would only cost me $15, not the usual $180! Yes, $180 for a 15 minute visit to renew my prescription. I have an extremely RARE disorder that does require a specialist I'm afraid. NO - I AM NOT ON WELFARE or State paid assistance. I pay out of pocket. But, let's do the math: I can pay $210 per month (averaging out meds and doc visits), to get EVERYTHING I NEED without health insurance, knowing that if I'm injured, I'm screwed, OR I can pay $295 per month (same avg), knowing that if I'm injured, because of my disability, I would only be covered up to 50%. Let's see, spend an additional $85 per month for that "safety net," that covers 50% of my needs, OR, try to use that $85 to help cover the $400 per month I'm going in the hole because of the entirety of my health needs? Hmm... tough choice... it REALLY, REALLY is. But, I can't afford the middle man ON TOP of the middle man. You see... my doc doesn't really get $180 for the visit - he gets probably half of that. Half of the $90 left over is taken by the clinic while the other half goes to pay into the CURRENTLY EXISTING socialized medicine program we have, for those without insurance who are covered by the government. I don't take advantage of the system even though I qualify, I don't ask for a hand out and am trying hard, on my own, disabled, to make it, and yet I currently have to pay for those who are without health insurance.
 
Is our current health care system broke? You bet it is. Maybe you forgot about the docs who complained with the health care system reforms in the 90's when the health insurance providers switched to a "get 'em in and get 'em out" method (of which HealthNet became infamous for), and the docs would only make money for shorter visits, less bedside manners and LESS tests. It's been in place for so long - because the GOVERNMENT supported it, that maybe you forgot how it changed bedside manners. When people like Glenn Beck argue against "socializing," services because it infringes on their money - they ONLY support Obama's position. He stands against GREED.
 
"Sorry - I don't want socialized medicine because I WANT MY MONEY - SCREW everyone else."
 
THAT IS NOT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S STAND on the issue. THAT IS GLENN BECK'S, and Sean Hannity's and Rush Limbaugh and they are making Republicans look greedy, selfish AND STUPID!
 
[Note to Glenn, Sean and Rush - I apologize in ADVANCE if that is NOT the message you intended - but maybe you need to STEP BACK and listen to your words - ie - Glenn - you wrote the book "Common Sense," of which I own five copies, four to still give away on top of the 3 I already have - but it should be COMMON sense to you to realize that this is EXACTLY what you are saying - IN CONTEXT - whether you mean to or not!]
 
Republicans, by the party-term and definition, are NOT greedy. We are NOT selfish - and I wish these guys would shut up - put up - or get off the air. In the infamous words of an infamous man, Lee Iacoca (sorry if I mispelled that), Lead, follow or get out of the way.
 
Argue against socialized medicine without appropriate checks and balances if you will. Argue against socialized medicine that deprives those who wish to pay for their own without penalties if you will. Those things make sense. But, do NOT argue against it because now you have to pay. A caller destroyed Sean Hannity two days ago and in my opinion ONLY (and it IS ONLY my opinion folks - please listen to his show and draw your own conclusions.. I trust you to do this), humiliated him and made him sound like a fool (which is sad, because he's not a fool), when Hannity when off on a tirade about Obama and ENTIRELY circumvented an answer because he had none. Do Republicans believe in the Defense of this country? YES. And, who pays for it? EVERYONE. IT IS SOCIALIZED. Do we believe in good education? YES. And, who pays for it - the parents of the children in school - or EVERYONE? You know the answer. Of course, both of those systems need reform, checks and balances and spending caps. But, that would be the same for medical coverage. We ALREADY have socialized health care under the "guise," known as "welfare," governed by the most idiotic and worthless agency in the WORLD - Department of Human Services. DO WE FORGET where the government buys its medication from to offer the prescriptions to the American people at cheap prices? CANADA, Europe and other foreign countries - NOT AMERICAN pharmaceuticals!!! DANGIT people - DON'T be stupid! Don't be lead like sheep. WHY does Canada get better prescription prices? SOCIALIZED MEDICINE! So - what have we learned?
 
Blindly jumping into socialized medicine - bad - the proof is in the pudding - as it were.
Blindly standing against it  - JUST as bad.
 
We ARE AMERICA. We are a nation that believes in helping the less fortunate. Ellis Island/The Statue of Liberty:
 
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!".
 
Did you forget that, too? Did you forget that we came to this Country under that VERY pretense? Did you forget the hospitality that was shown to us that we threw to the winds? Did you forget the meaning of care? I'm not a supporter of the Democrat party's philosophies. I DON'T support welfare - and if you've read my posts on here - you'd know that. I DO support a hand up. I DO support helping out. I DON'T support the government telling us where we'll give or spend our money - but I WON'T support the argument that: "It's MY money - so nah, nah," because I'm not childish, selfish or weak. If you are a Republican, and you care AT ALL about your party - you will write to Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, you will write to your State and Federal Representatives and you will say: STOP with the "rich" people bashing. Stop with the selfish "money" hoarding. That is NOT American. That is NOT what this Country is about. Consider a Health Care reform that better manages socialization issues and fair coverage for all people so that those with more money who wish to pay for more services - can do so WITHOUT added taxes or penalties - those without - can at LEAST get the basics with a program that is designed to HELP them recover financially and afford it on their own. But, we ALL share in school. We ALL share in postal and governmental and other issues - because we know these systems DO require a collaborative effort. And then, tell the officials, and those who represent our party on radio and television - SHUT UP. Quit acting like big, stupid, moronic babies without a clue. START doing what you promised - to report the truth. To act WITHOUT bickering over party sides and cover the issues that matter in an INTELLIGENT way. BE INFORMED. (Yes, the little Timmy Teetleburgermeyerwhaterverism was a funny story, well told and I enjoyed it - but ONLY insomuch as the story stood alone on the foolishness of "sob," stories, while the REALITY is that there are HORROR stories in the THOUSANDS happening daily that ARE very serious and CAN'T be ignored!)
 
Yes, straight forward socialized medicine instituted overnight would lead to massive problems, especially with under-estimated cost projections and other issues. Maybe we need more volunteers in medicine. Maybe if the government's going to spend money - it shouldn't be on socialized health care, but more free clinics for those who qualify or whose insurance companies have betrayed them. Maybe we need an FDA that is NOT corrupted and bought out by the pharmaceuticals (you can read more about this in my previous posts), but supports a WIDER variety of health services - including treating DENTAL health care with the same level of concern as regular, medical health care!!
 
Sorry that Glenn Beck bore the brunt of my complaint today, but it was too much and he just happened to be the straw that broke this old camel's back. I will say this: if the current health care reform bill passes - I pray for all of us - because the bickering and fighting will become even more moronic and baby-like and we'll see fighting and mudslinging that usually only children... or politicians... see. We will have massive problems financially and medically and we will see a decline in services just from the medical community that goes on strike and people WILL suffer. I pray for us all. But, remember this: the authorities YOU think YOU need to keep you safe from yourselves, I don't agree with, but I help pay for their services, too. The foreign military YOU think YOU need to keep us from overnight war fighting in foreign countries right now, dying and killing, I don't agree with, but I help pay for. The attorney general's the government FORCES us to pay for to PROTECT them from US, I DEFINATELY don't agree with, but we all help pay for. A reform is needed - YES. The one in play - NO. So - to that extent - the forces fighting this bill must AMASS in numbers and stand against it. But, DON'T do it blindly. DON'T do it because it will hurt your pocket book. Freedom costs - MIND, BODY, HEART, SOUL - BLOOD, SWEAT & TEARS. There is a price for freedom - and we must ALL be willing, as a collective, to pay for it. But, WE the people should be commanding what happens with it - NOT Uncle Sam - and THAT is the ONLY true argument to make.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How not to read an economic forecast, racism and more...

It is customary for our News media to report things that are, well, just not "entirely" accurate (the nicest way I can possibly say that). Many people don't know that the word: NEWS, came from: North, East, West, and South. News was originally intended to bring the facts of events that happened from around the area, via the voice of the people, to the various towns. Obviously, long before television, radio and newspapers. However, as times change, governments grow corrupt and take over what the news can and cannot report, and provide ever-increasing, false information to the news media to illicit specific reactions from the people - we [the listeners] - are no longer given the "facts," but are subject to the infamous, low standards of yellow journalism. Let's examine some headlines from this morning (and I'll relate what I can back to my previous posts where applicable to help validate that I am trying desperately hard to present all issues in an unbiased light):
 
"In Oregon, and on ABC News radio, it was reported that jobless rates are declining. There was a significant decline in the number of reported first time unemployment seekers. Likewise, the economy is showing signs of improving as retail businesses are showing higher than expected first quarter earnings." -
 
Now - for those of you that let these so-called, 'headlines,' skip by you with little to no care as to their contents, let me first say: that is a HUGE mistake. You let this information in one ear - it does not really come out the other, I'm afraid. The truth is, it sits in your brain, it gets processed, and whether or not it's on the back-burner of your daily thoughts, it exists and has affected you. The reason: in difficult economic times, in fact of hard-driven 'fears,' the idea of relief (especially if you're currently employed and would believe that lower reports of first time filers is somehow significant for you), is of great impact to you, even if only unconsciously. But, let's re-examine the situation: tens of thousands of small businesses have closed in the past year due to the economy consistently declining. That means, those people who worked there, are already laid off. Multitudes of corporations (again, in the tens of thousands), have condensed their operations, laying of millions of workers. There are only 185 million, working adults in America as of the last Census Bureau Report I read (which I believe was 2007). That number has dropped by a very large, significant portion.
 
What does that mean? Well, let's look at the second half of ABC's economic forecast: "The economy is looking up because retail businesses are reporting a higher-than usual, first quarter profit."
 
Oh really? You mean that, for example, Walmart (now Chinese owned), with its thousands of stores, no longer has to compete with more than 100 THOUSAND businesses in the industry of retail clothing alone (and as it's a multi-product store/mega-store, this carries over into every other facet of their operations), has condensed its operations and cut a huge portion of expenses from its usual overhead, and is reporting a "higher than expected/normal," first quarter earnings? Well, NO DUHH!!! Bad economy or no - that's a GIVEN. Walmart has lower prices, and their reports don't count for just one store, they count for THOUSANDS of stores - so naturally, they reflect a higher profit margin. Does that mean the economy's doing better? NO! Maybe, IF - and I STRESS: IF - the economy's doing better, it isn't because megastores are reporting high earnings. It isn't because car dealerships are reporting higher car sales - when the reason for Toyota having higher car sales is because GM cut out THOUSANDS of its dealers!! And, most certainly, the number of reported, first time unemployment seekers has NOT declined because less businesses are going out of business or losing - it's because THEY'RE GONE!!
 
C'mon, people! I like good news far more than bad, just as much as anyone else (okay, well, a LOT more than most people since it seems that today's "sheeple," look for bad news). But, I also DON'T like being mislead. And,  I cannot and will not believe that the "economic," forecasters, the so-called, 'experts,' don't know this information. I believe the unemployment department isn't reporting information as accurately as they "should." In fact, as the last bout of unemployment offerings came to an end about two months ago, in Oregon, it was suddenly reported that there were less people claiming unemployment and that was a good sign. WHAT? NO IT IS NOT! There were less people, because those who've been unemployed for a year or longer are now without ANY source of income, are not reporting unemployment because it's run out, and are STILL unemployed, and now in a financially desperate situation!!
 
Look, I'm not saying to be gloom, doom and despair! But I'm also saying - DON'T lie! Lying will not help anyone. Icing the cake, if the cake is made of poo, will NOT make the cake any better - it's STILL poo!! DUHH!? And, what about this shooting at the Holocaust Memorial Museum? A shooting - of a 'black,' security guard, by a white supremicist (supposedly), took place during a 'shoot-out,' which this terrible, hate-monger started. Seems pretty, well - 'black and white,' - doesn't it? Hmm... maybe not so for those of us that recognized the underlying concern: it was the holocaust museum. For those of you who have never been to one (and there are SEVERAL - for some reason - around the country), I can assure you, it is a reminder about how bad "white" Americans are. Am I being racist? No, in fact, I'm exactly the opposite, since it's the museum that is racist. If it was purely about the holocaust victims in WWII, then that would be pretty straight forward and without question. Why should it raise a red flag? Because: THE HOLOCAUST VICTIMS WERE WHITE JEWS. How is it, that a "white supremicist," has a problem with, "white jews?"
 
So, once you read the story (from ABC as linked above), you find out that there are several, including a "man," that stated that the shooter, Von Brunn (of course, German...) was a "pressure cooker," waiting to explode, and had, "underlying anger issues," and another clarified that Von Brunn was just, "crazy." Yes, for those of you asking the right questions, these were NOT experts, NOT his friends and NOT even people acquainted with Von Brunn in any other way than a rare, maybe once-per-year, quick, "hello." Let me add something else for you: Von Brunn was 88 YEARS OLD - and apparently, they claim that the election of a "black" president spawned his anger. Really? You mean, that Von Brunn, who is old enough to actually have lived THROUGH the holocaust, who had his social security cut, is unable to survive, walked into a holocaust museum, where MILLIONS of dollars supporting the propogation of hatred of Germans and White Americans is blasted (and if you've been in there - and your brain works - you know - that it's not just a tribute to those who suffered - which even I would support - but a segregasit, left-wing sponsored, liberal place to hate white people), upset because he could no longer survive, was losing his home and everything he'd worked for since the newly elected President put STIMULUS money from OUR taxes into holocaust museums while the elderly suffer, and brought a gun?
 
Yes. Did he plan on killing people? Nope. In fact, had it been one of the "white" guards that was shot - ABC might not have even let this story take a lead page (sorry - but racism is rampant in today's media, too). Von Brunn committed the well-known act of: Death by Cop (or in this case, security guard). Think about it - 88 years old - and a security guard, if Von Brunn was raising cain, could not have detained him? Remember what the article says - the other "guards" - (as in more than one), returned fire. It was Von Brunn vs. the museum's security guards. One, little old man alone - upset that our government is causing us to fall into misery - was ready to die. But, now, the black security guard is a hero and Von Brunn's going to go down in history as just a "crazy" old man. ABC reported that onne person who didn't even KNOW Von Brunn at all, knew there was reason to be concerned when Von Brunn gave away his computer and website, because people who give away precious things are usually at the end of their rope.
 
Really? I mean, a computer? Sorry, didn't know that was, 'precious/' And, he gave his website, which was obviously driven by racism, to someone who took it down. He didn't care to keep up the fight (that he thought was right) anymore. That's not "precious," it's not an heirloom, and it's most certainly NOT an indicator that Von Brunn was ready to die. Everything else in the article - that is - the FACTS about what Von Brunn was losing under this new administration - ARE reasons to have believed he was ready to die. And, of course, it was reported that white, hate groups are on the rise, and that it's a tragedy when white people are pushed because they'll snap. You mean, like in the Watts Riots? Or, maybe the South Central riots? Or, perhaps the Taliban? Oh wait - NONE of those folks are white - so isn't it more like - when ANYONE is pushed, they snap? And, what was Von Brunn doing? Yeah - he was saying on his website that he felt the time for talk was over, it was time to take action. Didn't we have an issue with an oriental student (born in America - identifying him by race for clarity), posted on web sites and to news stations for months his intentions to shoot college students, and when people ignored him, he did? Is that to say they should have raided Von Brunn? Of course not - the FBI raid people because they download music and upset Corporate America, not because they care about a few human lives...
 
Of course, Von Brunn was misguided. What he thought was a Federally managed conspiracy of Jews controlling our monetary system and government for the purpose of destroying white people, actually has much stronger ties to the Illuminati.... Okay - NON debatable points aside - the money is controlled by the government. The current budget threatens the very fabric of our economy. As I had posted yesterday for me, a Supreme Court Justice with a well-known prejudice in favor of Hispanics is using the race-card to gain support for her appointment and the President of this Country used it for his election. Is there a problem? Yes. Misguided as Von Brunn may have been, skewed by years of hatred (which obviously leads to the dark side....), at least saw the forest, just not the trees through the forest. Heck, Von Brunn wanted to place the Federal Reserve Board under legal, NON VIOLENT (hmm... sort of.. contradictory.. isn't it?), arrest for treason against our people. He claims to have been punished for the posts he made (sounds familiar.. where have I heard that before.. oh yeah - every radio show host crying out against the Fairness Doctrine for being attacked against freedom of speech and even myself currently being a victim of the same attack),
 
Finally, the sadness of all of this. The security guard (and it doesn't MATTER what the color of his skin is), was a father and family man. Good, bad or indifferent, a child will suffer from this. The people are trying to rise to anarchy, they are trying to speak out against the abuses of our economy and social lives by the Government. But, they are arrested, thrown in jail and left with fear tactics as the force against them. They are frightened - and when a frightened person - no matter their beliefs, is cornered - there will be consequences. I feel for Mr. Von Brunn, who wanted to leave this world, and if he doesn't, will pay a very serious price for this by the government. I feel for the guard, who paid a price already for his choice to be in a position that leads by fear. And, I feel for the people who did nothing when they heard this story.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How the media drives us with lies - pt1

Sure, I know what you're thinking - "Hey, I came here to learn about the truth of the government, not to hear conspiracy theories about the media!" But, what if.... I mean.... just - "what if" - a good portion of the government's lies and corruption include driving the media and leading us down the primrose path? Well, I mean - that's just insane - right? The media never lies. They never make mistakes. They're ALWAYS fair and balanced, aren't they?

Okay, fine, let's dispense with the idiotic mentality that we don't know that this is happening and get down to brass tacks, shall we? The commercial came on from the government sponsored 'protecting kids' campaign against 'online dangers.' Let me first repeat for you EXACTLY, ver batim, what the commercial states:

"You try to protect them. You want to keep them safe. You monitor what they watch. You set filters to control their content. But, are they really safe? ....... But, the truth is, you can't control your kids' exposure to sex, but you can control how they behave."

For those who MISSED it - let me point out the MAJOR areas of concern:

1. You - the parent, the role model, the guardian, the protector, the guidance counselor, the loved one, the creator, the provider - YOU - have NO control at all - YOU CAN NOT control YOUR CHILDS exposure to SEX because YOU can't stop the media - the ones broadcasting this commercial - from putting sex in front of them. YOU can't stop the abuse of the internet where idiots whose evolutionary basis for sex starts and stops at monkeys will post sex. YOU can't stop the kids at school from talking about it. YOU can't stop your own child's self-driven interest in it (aka their evolutionary development as you are NOT God).

2. But, you can control their behavior.

WHAT? Did I, um, miss something? Let me try this one on you: "Hey little Joey, I want you to say yes and no, sir and ma'am, thank you and please, never talk out of turn, always do your homework, do your chores, listen to every word I say, do as I say not as I do and behave...... But, what happens if they don't? Didn't the TV tell you that you could "control" their behavior? Oh, that's right - because the media is GOING to BLAST sex ALL OVER EVERY show they watch, every commercial they hear and do it so repeatedly that its effectiveness rivals hypnotherapy and subliminal messaging - you CAN'T control them. So, um, why... did the TV... tell me I could?

Because, in the face of Congressional laws coming out such as the "forced" community service, Congress wants to empower you to do as they say. You see - THEY CONTROL YOU. YOU - do not even control yourself. They DON'T need your vote. They DON'T need your approval. What they want - is your OBEDIENCE. But, you argue and say - "no, I'm NOT an idiot, I'm NOT your slave, this is a FREE country and I EXPECT the DEMOCRATIC process to allow me to put in my vote."

Now there's conflict. A resolution is needed. Congress says, "Well, we 'do' represent the desires of the people and we 'should' do what they want, but - naaaahhhhh - why do that? Let's scare them, weaken them, take away their power, screw with their heads - and when they're helpless - let's hit 'em below the belt!" You see, for those of you without children, let me 'splain.... no, wait, let me sum up (what movie? c'mon... you know which one 80's generation.. hahahaha):

We love our kids. We live in fear because we KNOW there are bad people out there, the police and court systems are inneffective and we don't want them hurt. Why? WE WENT THROUGH IT. The parents who are ignorant of what their kids are doing - didn't go through the hardships. WE KNOW. We do NOT want them to grow up. We want something DIFFERENT for them. We want a life of happiness and joy and one that doesn't involve strife and heartache. But, that's not always possible. We know that. And, we know that the media is just getting worse - and worse - and worse. I took my son to see a PG movie - and boy oh boy - what they get away with in PG movies is FAR more than I EVER wanted him to see. Learned my lesson.... And, what does the government do? They ENCOURAGE sex in media. The FCC throws a temper tantrum because Janet Jackson had a 'portion' of her COVERED boob pop out during the super bowl half-time because 'families' were watching - but.... it's okay to them that many of today's cartoons include kissing, sexual scenes, sexual jokes and the music videos that ALL the kids are watching include 'pimpin' the ho's' and the degraded value of idols such as Spears and Lohan.

Right, makes a TON of sense, right? I mean, why not let the SOURCES of the MAJORITY of children's media input include bare butts, skimpy outfits, pimped out sluts, superficial make-up jobs to attract sex, but SLAM down those FAMILY values because... oops... it happened at the Super Bowl in front of everyone? The answer's simple - mom and dad saw. They saw what the FCC was putting in front of their children. Anyone watching this season of South Park knows EXACTLY what I'm talking about. Only when mom and dad become aware does the FCC lay the SMACK down on anyone.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How the media drives us with lies - pt2

 (continued on from "How the media drives us with lies - pt. 1) -
 
Let's examine this in some detail, shall we? Quiznos Subs - their commercial "Dave, put it in me," as the guy looks down at his crotch and says, "Nuh-uh, I burn." Um, maybe in ANY other context, I might have laughed. Sure, I've got the 13 year old mentality that finds fart and sex jokes funny - I'm a guy - EVERY guy (even those who pretend otherwise) - has this mentality by nature. But, it wasn't. Why? For two reasons -
1. IT IS A SUBWAY SANDWHICH COMMERCIAL BROADCAST ON CARTOON NETWORK - THIS is in front of OUR children??? Dammit! My son's not so stupid to have caught the theme of it. They weren't even subtle about it! Sex and subway sandwhiches... gosh.... sex hasn't PERMEATED EVERY SINGLE FACET of hollywood, has it? But - the truth is - not even that was what REALLY peeved me -
2. The OVEN WAS A DUDE. They did NOT use a female voice for the sticking in of the 'torpedo,' sub, into its REAR entry. For anyone who missed it - go look it up yourself, 'cause I'm not gonna encourage it.
 
Is that to say that the subtelty of the absolutely GAY reference was wrong because it was a 'gay' reference? No. In fact, I'm not even sure that the company advertising for Quiznos thought it through. Hell - they STARTED with DEAD hamsters, modifying an existing internet song for their advertising career. What I am peeved about, is that THIS is the VERY issue I FIRST started with - the MEDIA - the people BROADCASTING THIS COMMERCIAL - are the SAME ONES - that told us we 'love our children, and because we do, if we WANT to be GOOD parents, we'll try to keep them away from sexual themes - but..... too bad, we can't.' And, why not? BECAUSE HERE IT IS - on the VERY channel my son watches, right in front of him. Not only is the sexual theme blatant, but the subtle theme is grotesquely exaggerated.
 
Now, in contrast, I absolutely LOVE the Burger King mini-burger commercial because the idea of a horde of hot, playboy-type chicks crowding around me, giving me full attention is actually kind of - cool. Of course, because I'm NOT an idiot and I know that no matter HOW many times I unwrap those mini burgers, women aren't going to flood around me - I try to find the 'subtle' hint - since SEX is the NON-subtle hint. And, survey says: Even overweight, fast-food eating, can't hook up with playboy models because they're not rich and sexy guys can get the rich chicks - they just gotta do what the commercial says. So - what does that do for kids? It LOWERS their standards. And, what's the problem? (and I quote) "You can't control your kids' exposure to sex." Well, not only that - but I am now faced with their lowered standards of what's beautiful, what the easy road promises (but in truth can never produce), and I, the parent - become the liar. SO HOW IS IT I CAN "CONTROL" their behavior?
 
Well - next comes the 'Osbournes' variety hour. No, that's not going to be the full representation of the degraded mentality and unevolved state of humanity, is it? Then what else? Another reality show that relies on the completely 'unrealistic' to survive? Bill Cosby's show in the 80's is considered one of the defining elements of the current troubled condition of the America Family based on media input:
 
The quick fix doesn't work.
 
Mom and dad fight, and in 30 minutes, are they back, kissing and everything is okay? Nope. Billy gets in trouble in school and in 30 minutes is it fixed? Nope. Hell - even today on shows like 'House' (albeit I LOVE that show and will otherwise speak no wrong of it): the people who lived in a way that screwed themselves up, at the end of 1 hour - everything's better. Can the kid's go out, get pregnant and do the same? Nope. Media REALLY took us away from the point of morality. And how, why? Here's something I LOVE - HULU!! I give these guys MAJOR props.
 
What do they offer? Cerebral, gelatinisizing shows.
Can you control them? Nahh... what are you gonna do, shut off your TV AND your computer?
What is their goal? An evil plot to destroy the world.
 
That's it. THAT'S IT! Right there - in black and white. It's not Quiznos or BK's openly sexual content that tries not to say the word, "sex," - it ACTUALLY says what they want. TV rots your brain. TV over the Internet rots your brain. And, what would be the eventual goal? World destruction. Simple. To the point. Heck, if our Government was THIS honest - we'd at least ALL be in a better place!! If we were this honest with ourselves - we'd be in a better place. "Hey, I'd say it's nice to see you today, Bill, but that would just be some empty form of flattery based on socially accepted norms, when in fact, I actually hate the way you treat your family, think your arrogant and stuck up and wish I never saw you."
 
But, will we do that? Nope. Why? FEAR. Yes, I actually sit up at night and wonder if Hulu IS really made up of aliens destroying us. Why? Because - that is WHAT they are broadcasting BECAUSE they KNOW we are SO far down the rabbit hole that we can no longer distinguish reality from fiction. We are the sheep that went to the other side, realized the grass WASN'T greener, and are now wandering around aimlessly. We are a greedy, selfish, "thing"-driven population. We DON'T want the truth. If it's given to us, we REJECT it. And, the point of ALL of this?
 
The government knows this. They feed us what they want us to hear. Obama received 100,000 questions to answer on-line? C'mon - let's NOT be stupid. They filtered out 100 MILLION to only 100,000. And, the majority were about legalizing pot? Yeah - SURE they were. The MAJORITY were questioning his budget policies. And, what did he answer?
 
Four. Four out of 100,000 (out of 100 million). Four questions based on "how will you help lower my tuition?" That is CRAP. Sorry for the foul language - but the truth is - his 'people' chose questions about 'children' to gain public support. It was a media campaign to get the public to like him because 'he cares about the kiddies.'
 
Yeah - but he can't stop their exposure to sex, right? Nope - but he can tell you that you can control their behavior, right? Sure - so long as Congress has a SLEW of pre-determined bills sitting on their desks that they will pass, one at a time, slowly, that will place GREATER control on us. And, they KNOW better than to start with the adults. While the majority of America's made up of the gooey-mush brained television watchers, there are enough people (aka Glenn Beck) who will talk about the truth and raise Cain. So, let's do what the Nazi's did - go after the kids. The kids are easy targets. FORCE parents to believe they're in control - create a RIFT between the kids and the parents - and you have a nation of children willing to turn in their OWN parents to the Nazi regime...
 
Sound stupid? Maybe... in fact... I HOPE and PRAY that you're right and I'm wrong. Because, folks, it's happened before - and it WILL happen again.
That which is, was once before, and that which will come, already has been. Ecclesiastes.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Poking fun at the media

Yes, I know this is off topic of governmental conspiracies, and I apologize for that - but I couldn't resist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5rejhaYDOI
 
CNN Caption: Obama on Marijuana
 
and:
 
(where in the same speech Obama plans to) Smoke Out Terrorists

What does all this mean?
For a President who has so ADAMANTLY spoken against the legalization of marijuana, if left to himself and the media (and the fallacy of the American language), one *might* assert that Mr. Barrack Obama has a public relations issue that rivals George Bush Jr.
 
So.... the next time our so-called 'responsible' media people, (aka the liberals), rag consistently on Bush for his "mispronunciation" of the American language, they might want to consider Mr. Obama's "misuse" of the American language. Because, quite frankly, I'm not sure what's funnier - a President whose accent gave him trouble with the word 'nuclear,' or a President who is On Marijuana and smoking out terrorists.
 
Silly - yes. Worthwhile... maybe not. But, fun nonetheless!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We don't need Mary Poppins - we NEED the TRUTH (pt 2)

Continuing on... you see... one of the very, most precious gifts that the Lord has seen fit to bestow upon me is: vision. You can call it prophecy, strangeness, illusions, delusions, dreams, whatever. Personally, I don't care what you call it. When you read the following, perhaps you'll see what I mean:
 
You see, I saw this army. They were slothful and fat. They were dumb and lazy. They fought amongst themselves, hurting each other. They stayed in their armor, dirty, smelly, constantly stuffing their faces, falling asleep in between everything they had to do and so on. Why? Because, the government that commanded them, that ordered them to kill and commit corruption and help them get away with anything they wanted, that government knew, that the BEST way to control these people was to keep them happy - all the time. Keep the wool over their eyes. If these people weren't fat and eating themselves to death, they were tired and asleep. If they weren't doing either of those, they were doing what the government told them. If one of them got injured and complained (as I saw two of them fight, the bigger one cutting off the smaller ones' arm and the smaller one running around for help), nobody listened. Nobody responded. They let him bleed to death and die. Everybody was too preoccupied with themselves to care. They wore their 'armor' like it was some kind of security blanket. They believed their personal power and authority to be absolute because they were given whatever they wanted.
 
Meanwhile - the people suffered. That food did not come for free. It came from the starving homes of children. They were fed sweets and candies and all sorts of "goodies", that were, in reality, very, very bad for them. Their sense of 'justice,' hurting the innocent, even one another, without consideration for morality, lef them to self-indulgance. Their constantly falling asleep simply kept them busy and out of the way. Whenever someone cried out for help, there may have been a spark.. an inkling of interest... but it soon faded. How does this relate to our current society?
 
Simple: we have been lead into self-indulgance, greed and desensitization by the very authorities we trusted to be the shepards. Think I'm being an 'extremist?' Maybe you haven't noticed the cars on the road - the people who pass by the starving and homeless, desensitized to the fact that there REALLY ARE quite a few people out there in need, even if they appear not to be, and instead, pay CASH to 'beautify' the hunk of INANIMATE steel that they call their vehicles - as it's their status symbol. Maybe you haven't noticed your dependence on radio and television. Maybe you haven't noticed that when a news story comes up and we all get excited, it disappears and switches to the next topic before it's ever done and we don't even remember what the last one was! Still don't believe me? How many of you remember who Terri Schiavo is? C'mon - how many? What was the case about? Hey - doesn't matter that the media should have stayed the hell out of it and the law was wrong to intervene in the way they did - but the truth is - who remembers? Who knew about the thousands and thousands of OTHERS who are in hospitals, at the same time Shiavo was, suffering from the same fate? Or, about the millions who have been suffering that fate for the past 30+ years?
 
Here's the one truth above all others I can COMPLETELY assure you of:
 
You don't want to know the truth.
 
I mean that. Not as a 'warning,' but as a 'matter-of-fact' statement. You, personally, would rather NOT know the world is ending, NOT know the economy is failing, NOT know that bad things are going to happen. And, the media KNOWS it! They've been training you, at the order of the shepards (government), for countless years now. They've been masterfully convincing you that death, gangs, violence and such factors are not really, "that big of a deal." Well, that is, unless the Feds suddenly 'want' it to be, and suddenly, there's a "crisis!" Remember the 80's? Remember the stories that made people live in fear in big cities, that you would be carjacked, at gunpoint, at every intersection? You don't? Either you're too young... and it's time you realize that you NEED to be educated for YOURSELF... or you were trained to ignore it and move on. How many of you remember the "AIDS" epidemic? Where did that go? The "Killer bees?" The "Bird flu".... people.. "ANTHRAX?" Where have these things gone? Go ahead - take a sealed, manilla envelope to a courthouse, with documentation to turn in, stand in line and try to open it up in front of the court clerk. Know what he/she's going to tell you? GO OUTSIDE and do that. They're not allowed to let you open the envelopes in the courthouse because of the Anthrax concern. You can't bring sealed documents into a courthouse for that reason!! But... where'd the story go? Since when did we ALL become the terrorists?
 
It's simple. Mary Poppins... isn't real. Sorry. Hate to spoil it for you, but she's only the representation of the good within each and everyone of us if we ever chose to look for it. Her umbrella is love. Her smile is charity. Her gift was not profit, for in truth, it came with a price. If we want things to be better in our lives, we have to WORK for it. No, I'm NOT talking about the daily, grinding, boring, unrewarding and unrelenting job you have simply so you can pay off some debts and continue to incur others, hoping against hope to stay in that "comfort" zone; I'm talking about yourselves, your friends, and your family.
 
This isn't a 'cheery,' lovey, make you feel all warm-hearted turn around. It's the truth. In the vision I was given, the one person who watched all of this pain could sit by no longer. They began to fight back. Sure, the guards... the people... who had been kept in limbo, were gong to suffer and be hurt. They were going to find themselves at the ends of boots and fistacuffs, not out of anger, but out of love. Something HAD to break their routine. Unfortunately, in the world we're in, there's only one 'wake up' call that can be severe enough to aid the vast majority now:
 
War. Not even natural disasters work anymore. Look at South west America. What happened to the south? What happened to the people? Do you even know? A tsunami SO powerful, that it flooded multiple CITIES, wiped out homes and destroyed lives... but... the media, who capitalized on it when it happened, quickly buried it to keep you from caring. What about the flood that hit asia and killed over 100,000 people? The orphaned children? Have you heard about them? It profitted the media... and then *poof*, just like magic, it went away. You see, when the media tries to be "mary poppins," they swoop in, make everything look good, take their money and then leave. But, unlike Mary Poppins, they don't actually fix anything. In fact, just the opposite. They end up making things worse because we never had time to deal with the original problems that were there and are suddenly encountering newer, even more devastating problems! Be afraid folks.. be very afraid. And if you aren't now.. you will be ... you will be. (no... I'm not paying Lucasfilms for that either.... nor am I getting paid, so we can call it even).
 
We need the truth. we need to know everything sucks. This isn't because we 'need' a downer. We're ALREADY in a depressed state. This is the most depressed nation of people in the UNIVERSE.. at any given time in all of HISTORY! But, when a person's down, what do you do? Do you sit in there and tell a manic depressive, "hey bud, it's gonna be okay,"? Do you look in at the person sitting in the bath tub, getting ready to slice their wrists open or drop a hair dryer in the water with them and say, "Don't look so glum, buddy, things are gonna work out!"? YOUR positivity makes people MORE depressed. Maybe things WILL work out. Maybe they'll just work out for YOU. But, by pretending everything's beautiful - we are only MASKING the truth. By ignoring the problem, we are only letting it GET WORSE. You have to step up to the people, you have to take 'em by the hand and say, "HEY - YEAH - things SUCK - things are BAD - and probably, they are going to get WORSE! AND, I can't promise you I can fix them, or they'll EVER get fixed, but sitting here sulking, sitting here getting ready to give up... even sitting here PRETENDING that your house is NOT on fire will ONLY BURN YOU."
 
What is it the President said that the news jumped all over? (now remember... I'm NOT an Obama supporter... but here's the truth): He said: People, the economy's bad. Things don't look good. We need change NOW. We need to do something immediately or we're all going to fail.
 
So, why did the government (aka controllers of and via the media), slap down the request for positivity. People WERE listening to the President and WERE trying to get prepared for the worst. They WERE watching the news and saying, "hey - we're all being cheated and lead like lambs to the slaughter - we NEED change." But, it wasn't the change the President wanted. The government didn't want us involved. Instead, they realized their mistake. Rather than us just accepting their totalitarian authority, we were going to rebel, and in order to appease the masses, they are filling our plates with "goodies," they are shrouding us in "armor," and they are trying to quietly separate themselves from us. The results?
 
Those "goodies," these "incentives", the "stimulus package," and other factors... are actually NOT good for us at all, and we will suffer for indulging in them.
The "armore," the 'protective blanket,' that tells people to spend, spend, spend, people to be okay with the idea their nest egg will return, people not taking action against AIG, believing the government is doing it for them, will wake up from their slumber only to find their armor was cheap ol' plastic and aluminum, and when the sword comes down, we will be hurt... badly.
And, their separation... well... you've read George Orwell's, 1984, haven't you? What about Ayn Rand's, When Atlas Shrugged? (1984 is on video for those of you lazy people.. like me :)... don't know if atlas shrugged is.. you can look it up if you want). If you have.. then you've been warned.. you're just ignoring it. If you haven't... then you're the ones who are going to suffer doubly, unaware that the tsunami will hit.
 
It takes one person, folks. A guy from Texas told the IRS - "I'm not paying taxes. You can't make our elected officials do it.. who are NOT above the law... you can't make me do it." Another gentleman followed after a senator and caught up with him in the white house, on camera, and video tapped his attempts at forcing the Senator to answer the question, "Why are YOU not being held responsible for your actions and how can YOU represent the people if you're cheating them?"
 
But, do you hear about them now? Nope. The news doesn't want you to hear that 'negativity.'?????
 
Finally... let's not forget one, important point. Mary Poppins - the REAL story of Mary Poppins - wasn't the kind nanny who 'shielded' anyone from the truth. She was adamant that the solution to the problem can only come when we face the REAL problem. She didn't tell the children the banks were corrupt or deceiptful. She didn't tell them their father was just another corrupted bureaucrat. She told him the truth about the world around him. The little old lady who feeds the birds really COULD use their support. THAT was a worthy cause. She didn't diss on the banks. She didn't tear into "father." She let them destroy themselves, but cound only do so by EDUCATING the children with the truth. You cannot defend yourself if you are not equipped. You need the truth. You need to believe in what's right. You need to stand up. You need to not let the few who have tried be the only ones. No one rose up after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. fell, and because of it, his dream was corrupted (referring back to the post regarding the boondocks and segregation). The impoverished CAN'T do it alone. YOU - ALL of you - must fight. Think you're going to risk what you have? What have you got? Really... what is it? What is so valuable to you that you don't believe in freedom? Your stuff? ... too sad for me to comment on.... Your family? Sure.. till they get hit with the 200 - 400% tax increase, and money will tear everything apart.. war will tear it apart....
 
Maybe your wealth? What you profit from today, will have to be taken away tomorrow - when you'll need it the most - to pay for everything you were given today. Your life? What life? What are you here for? What are you working for? What are you doing? Don't be afraid to be the one. It has to be a chain.. it has to continue.. and only when our voices raise.. only when one.. after another.. after another.. fight.. die and care MORE about the future then themselves.. does change happen.
 
Just look at Christ. If it was good enough for the Son of GOD, to die as a mortal, to save the people; and His disciples to do the same, then should we not quit inflating our egoes and also stand up?..... think about it... not today.. not tomorrow.. but soon....
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We don't need Mary Poppins - we NEED the TRUTH (pt 1)

It's all over the news; the media has been having a feeding frenzy on the issue: positivity. Barrack Obama needs to be more 'positive' in his speeches. The media needs to be more 'positive'. There are articles being published, calling for the media and press to start reporting 'good times,' not negativity.
 
But, does trying to transform the President and the media into a virtual 'Mary Poppins,' come with a price?
 
The answer is: yes; a very, very steep price. Here's the truth:
  • The economy has failed.
  • Democracy has failed.
  • Capitalism has failed.
  • Greed has led us down the poophole.
  • Churches have quit offering the truth.
  • The government's level of corruption is at an all-time high.
  • Government spending is out of control.
  • Our future generations are about to be totally screwed.
  • We NEED change NOW - not tomorrow or in a few years, NOW.
  • IF change doesn't happen, all of us alive today, WILL feel the terrible effects before it's over - and we WILL suffer too.
 
Sound very positive? No? Let me "Mary Poppinize" it for you in the way the media would like to see it:
  • Hey, the economy will get better, don't worry.. spend, spend, spend!
  • The Government's not responsible... past government's were, and this is a brand new day and age of honesty and integrity!
  • Don't blame corporate America, corporate greed is a good thing, it stimulates fair growth for small businesses and all of us.
  • You have every RIGHT to DEMAND MORE money... and we SHOULD spend more.. it's a good thing...
  • Separation of Church and State is an 'old school' philosophy, we need to do it Rome's way, where the government commands religion and policies exist to FORCE specific variations in faith...
  • Our politicians are there for US! They love us and care! They won't do ANYTHING that we wouldn't want them to do!
  • Don't worry about the 'free' money, we'll print more. After all, if you still have checks in your checkbook, are you REALLY broke?
  • The future generations don't know what's good for them. We do. We'll fix it.. just wait it out and see.. and if it's too late to fix it later, well, then we can all look back and laugh at this, right?
  • Change will come, just keep trudging away in your lives, and you'll see... aren't things getting better right now?
  • It's our job today, to care about tomorrow, and we can make the difference, we'll just add the taxation later on... and of course, there's no need to concern ourselves with a 400% tax increase on future generations... they'll have TONS of money, won't they?
Hmmm.... well, I don't know about you, but I feel SO much better! Whew! What a relief! Things are looking GREAT! I'm not gonna worry about unemployment, failing small businesses or HUGE government spending bills. I'm not gonna let AIG or the banks get me down! I'm going forward now! I'm preparing for my future! I'm... what's that? What do you mean I didn't have the money to spend? What do you mean the stock prices are still falling and I've lost everything? What do you mean I have nowhere to live? What do I do now?
 
What do you mean you have no answers because we wiped ourselves out? Didn't Mary Poppins save us? Didn't her umbrella of protection against the storms bring us new hopes? Didn't the bank hire back the family head that they fired so brutally and unjustifiably (as he finally stood against their greed), and give him a raise and higher rank and position? WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE MOVIES AREN'T REAL???
 
Folks, it's called the primrose path:
Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,
Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven,
Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine,
Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads
And recks not his own rede.
 
Hypocrisy. It's pure and simple. The doctor is dedicated to healing people... which is to say, 'he cares about people,' .... but only those who can afford it, which is, in contrast, to say, 'he doesn't care for people.' The politician is dedicated to representing the interests and needs of the people who elect him, which is to say, 'he is there to serve the people,' .... but passes bills without them, generates money for the government and his own raises, which is, in contrast, to say, 'he serves himself.' The police officer is dedicated to enforcing laws against lawbreaking citizens, which is to say, 'he serves the interests of justice for the safety of the people,'.... but instead, matlock isn't real, the detectives constantly attack and berate innocent people, shoot innocent people, imprison innocent people, stalk the people assuming their guilt and constantly lie because they don't care about hurting the innocent majority to get a few bad guys to get their money raises and exert/show off their power, which is, in contrast, to say, 'they serve their personal agendas.' This list goes on...
 
Congress just announced that they are going to, "end this foolish, automatic, cost of living increase, which, in these hard economic times, is ridiculous and unfair to the people." [They are now going to require a vote to pass cost of living increases]...
 
.... okay... stay with me on this one... (trying not to laugh out loud here)....
 
Congress did NOT, just announce, that they are going to stop giving "themselves" continuous raises, but rather, they are going to stop seeing to it that the American public, the PEOPLE, stop getting cost of living wage increases unless it is voted upon. Wait a second.. wasn't it... "we the people," who voted in to have the cost of living increases? Who remembers this? C'mon --- I know YOU do! YOU remember that YOU WANTED your employers to be forced to adjust their minimum wage levels for cost of living increases!! But, it doesn't MATTER what YOU want. YOU'RE JUST the PEON voter who means NOTHING in a Democracy. Now, Congress will vote on it.. FOR YOU. In fact, the cost of living increase vote also helped limit the old, Congress-giving-themselves-automatic-raises-whenever  the heck they wanted to, procedure. But, now, Congress will get to reinstate that. Fix the "old" Bush ways that were so screwed up.. you know... the ones that said the people's wages have to be adjusted for the cost of living increases? Remember that now?
 
When we are LIED to - when we are lead to believe that everything's 'beautiful,' we are NOT dealing with the Mary Poppins' of the world.. oh no... we are dealing with the Bernie Madoffs. We are dealing with the Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's. We are dealing with the CORRUPTED, GREEDY, SELFISH people that are trying to get their OWN agendas by you by "snow-jobbing" you. Why do they want you to be happy? Well... let me 'splain.... in part 2.. hee hee hee
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Fall Guy - Madoff not guilty?

So, you've heard the news, the hype and the reactions... Bernard Madoff, an elderly man, has plead guilty to 11 counts of investment fraud that supposedly began in the 90's during a 'recession' time then. Of course, Madoff, a 70-year old man, is expected to spend the rest of his life in prison (although I'll digress on how stupid this is - you can read my other posts on the 'budget'). And, the money? Well... it's just GONE! Yup - BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars: *poof* up in smoke. Could Madoff have lessened his sentence, or perhaps gotten out of jail altogether? Sure could; all he had to do was lead them to the dough. What about accomplices? There's no way this man did all of this alone.
 
And, that's the interesting part.
 
For those of you who have already considered this, I commend you. For those of you who are about to be in for a shock (if anyone ever acually read any of these... hahahahaha), I have already warned you about the danger of TV brain - and this should be proof enough - for you. Madoff is taking a tremendous hit. He's too old to live super long in prison, has a family he loves dearly and may also never get to see them again. There's no 'bargaining' chip to get out of prison. In fact, had he 'shown them the money,' two major problems exist:
 
1. The government would have pocketed it all. End of story. Then, they would have gone after more. Of course, the responsible thing for our Government to do (the key word being: responsible, as in, something that Uncle Sam WON'T do), would have been to set up Bernie Madoff as the executor to a specialty fund, with all of that money in it, so he could respond to everyone who had lost their earnings and write out checks until everyone was paid back. That way, there would have been restitution for those who lost, and Madoff would have been the one to pay that restitution and be left with nothing. Harsh, but a LOT more sensible than US SPENDING money on him to sit in prison. Unfortunately, that's NOT why he's being quiet....
 
2. The second problem - and here it is, the 'conspiracy theory' for those of you who are argumentative - Bernie Madoff is a fall guy. He WAS NOT in this alone. At his level, his fraud involves top level, corporate executives, politicians and the like. C'mon - after this last "stimulus" spending that put BILLIONS into the pockets of corporate executives rather than fund operations - which was a DIRECT VIOLATION/ACT OF FRAUD by the individuals, was overlooked by our Government and shoved to the background by putting the attention on MORE stimulus spending. So, why is Madoff a fall guy? I'll tell you:
 
The man loves his family. He has children and grandchildren. I don't know if he has great grandchildren or not, but in this economy, with a government gung-ho on convincing the people there's a 'crisis' and gaining their support for law enforcement to go out there and start arresting everyone, all of the people involved with Madoff are scared. And, scared people resort to some pretty unscrupulous tactics. Sure, the FBI could offer Madoff immunity, but not his family (that's governmental 'logistics' for you). If your entire family - your brothers, sisters, daughters, sons, great grandchildren - INNOCENT - children, were in danger, what would you do? "You're on, I'm deeply sorry for what I did......." and accept a life rotting in prison. What's the scenario? Oddly enough - television - finally has its day! Just like in the movies, these guys walk into Madoff's office, toss down photographs of his family in front of him, maybe even visit his great granddaughter (or whomever... not totally familiar with his family.. sorry), his friends, somebody, and they let him talk to them through a telephone where he says, "If you hurt a hair on their head...." And, they respond, "You're in no position to bargain. You wanna see them alive, you just do as you're told...." And, on the other end of the phone we hear, "Grandpa, is that you, grandpa?" And, finally, Mr. Madoff says, "Fine, I'll do it, anything you say."
 
And, what happens at the FBI? "Mr. Madoff, just tell us who else is involved. Where's the money? We know you didn't and couldn't spend it all... just tell us, and we'll do our best to protect your family. Do they have them now? Are they in danger?" But, what if he answers? Police sirens that can be heard for DOZENS of blocks come blaring down the street, and the guys in the black clothes with the hoods on, take the tied up family members, put a gun to their head and the last words they hear are, "I guess gramps didn't love you enough to save your life... too worried about himself."
 
And the shot is fired.
 
What? You don't think that happened? Or... you don't think that COULD have happened? What if it were you?
 
A) You stole billions and you WANT to pay restitution, would you keep the money hidden and go to jail? How is THAT, restitution?
B) You stole billions and you WANT to keep the money, but are going to jail for the rest of your life and are hoping to secretly bribe your way out? Why didn't you leave the country and go into hiding in ADVANCE of all this?
 
Look at ALL the possible scenarios - shut down that DAMNABLE television, and read between the lines. Folks, it doesn't talk a person with even HALF a brain to figure this out. I've looked into Mr. Madoff's eyes, and although this sounds strange to many of you - I can assure you with my heart and soul - that man did not plead guilty because he was. He plead guilty to protect someone. He is covering up. No good reason to take a fall for the others who profitted... after all... if that were the case... he should have expected them to come to his aide OR take them down too (unfortunately, it's an unscrupulous world). Nope - that's NOT what happened. Mr. Madoff is hiding the money (most of which, is probably BACK in the hands of his partners except the amounts he has kept hidden for his family), hiding his partners and preventing the FBI from having a paper trail. And, now, it's all over the news for 2 reasons:
 
1. The FBI WANTS his partners to see this because they know, as long as he's on his way to prison, there's still a chance he'll break... and they want to scare the others into coming forward... especially his family (that's sort of how law enforcement works for you who haven't been exposed to it - they prey on the weak - sorry, but that's just how they roll), hoping to get more victims.
 
2. They want to infuriate the public so much that they create a panic, and can put the pressure onto Congress to pass some other bogus bill, based on NO facts, but scare tactics forced upon the people, in order to get more access to people's personal records and lives, in order 'prevent' future issues.
 
After all - that's what it's all coming down to, isn't it? Predictive punishments? Didn't I write last time that it's REALLY about the fact we're all guilty, we're all on conditional release, and by operating in this mindset, the authorities can act in 'advance' of crimes by having access to our lives, and SAVE us from OURSELVES by locking us up BEFORE we actually do any wrong.
 
Just think about it - okay? I'm not asking you to outright believe me because I have NO evidence. I am purely speculating based upon logic and reasoning... and rationalizing based upon my perceptions. That's ALL this is. But... think carefully.. for yourselves. Don't let the news media... who has OPENLY been lying to you and having to repeatedly apologize for it, tell you how to think. Even if it didn't go down remotely how I suggested in this article... something's not right and we're NOT getting the whole story - but in order to convince you otherwise - the news is playing audio feedback from investors who feel cheated and hurt including some calling Madoff a "maggot" who should crawl back under his rock and others saying that jail is worthless because "when the money runs out," how are they going to "feed their families?" These are EMOTIONAL drivers. These are NOT logic drivers. These are NOT facts. These are opinions meant to drive you emotionally. The question is - how will you respond? Will you continue to be lead like lambs to the slaughter as the news media and government have done for years, bringing you to where we are today? Or, will you finally stop following the wolf in sheep's clothing and stay close to the Shepard? God granted you free agency - free will - free choice. Why? To use it. The only thing separating us from our animalistic, primal instincts, is our ability to rationalize and choose. Animals act out of passion, killing, murdering, fighting to survive.
 
WE are not animals. We are a unique machine, created with a higher intelligence (although it's obvious by the State of the world that we rarely choose to use it), that is designed to distinguish us from all other life on this planet. How do YOU judge life on this planet? By who dominates? Then, I suppose the ANTS are heralded as the masters. By those who have treated it the best? Then certainly NOT humans. By those who have the mose innovation/technology? Then you should be looking to rare and endangered species such as tigers, who have overcome the 'technological' innovations of 'mankind', without our supposed 'higher' intelligence and without the so-called 'advantages' we have intellectually over them, to survive beyond us. But, if you judge life based upon those who have taken their natural born skills, given by GOD at birth.. NOT those empowered by mankind through life.. then perhaps, you SHOULD consider thinking for yourselves.
 
A change is coming. We all know it. We all feel it. We can ALL sense it. Is it 2012? Is it 2010? I don't know. But, it's coming. And, unlike the crap you hear on television and the internet, it's NOT the end of the world... but as written in the Bible, in Mayan prophecy, Hindu legends and almost EVERY other religion in the WORLD - it's the end of the world AS WE KNOW IT! And, we'll be given a choice on how it ends:
 
violently or peacefully
 
Through war and fighting where the stupid kill each other and the smart ones who head for the hills wait for it all to finish... or
 
Through an increase in our knowledge and love of one another, where we simply choose to think for ourselves.
 
There's no riding the fence this time, sorry. Gotta pick a side. And, I think the choice is pretty obvious.. or.. at least.. I hope it is. Is Madoff guilty? Maybe. But, there is MUCH more than we are being told.. and that should scare the CRAP out of us. To be lied to and deceived by our news media, by the authorities that we trust......... I wonder if the news and law enfocrcement are LESS or MORE guilty than Madoff? After all... he's guilty of deception, isn't he? But, that was with "money", (and as Timothy wrote: IS the root of all evil; so what else COULD you expect from it?). The news and the authorities are running deceptions with our very lives and trust in them to PROTECT us... and that, to me, is a FAR, far worse crime.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sleep Disorder - Naroclepsy - When the Justice System won't "Wake up"

So, you were tired, picked up the kids, got home from the office, set down your keys and have no idea where they are, huh? You went shopping because you needed something healthy for dinner, but it was a long day at the office, and when you got home, you put everything away, collapsed on the couch, turned on the television and sometime later passed out. When you woke up, you couldn't exactly remember everything you did, what you did, where you went, what you said and now - you can't find the dinner you purchased?? Or - even better, you left it out and it's dethawed, or you shoved it in the freezer in the bag you bought it in, lazily, and just shrugged off the fact that you did something extremely unusual for yourself, knowing you were just 'tired.'
 
But - if you're not sure what you did on your way home and you can't remember everything you said, where you went or even recall, in any detail, the trip home - how do you know you didn't run a red light, speed, say something that's going to get you in trouble, went somewhere you didn't mean to go or worse? Imagine living like this everyday of your life and depending heavily upon medication to counter it. Imagine waking up one day and finding yourself being accosted by the authorities because you just shoplifted, made a threat on someone's life or worse - got into a car accident? Before you read on - try to imagine every minute of your most tired day these last two weeks - try to remember setting down a pen or pencil right in front of you and suddenly not being able to find it, or going to do a task and suddenly realizing you forgot what you were doing. If you can remember this - at any time in your life - you're about to understand what 1 minute in the life of a narcoleptic is like, and what that means legally - and you should be very worried.
What was once considered a rare disorder is now a world-wide phenomenon known as: Narcolepsy. It is one of the many sleep disorders that affects an estimated 3 million people around the world. In America, it is estimated that over 200,000 individuals suffer from this disorder, but only 50,000 are diagnosed. Even rarer on this list are those narcoleptics who suffer from the many side effects such as cataplexy, hallucinations, sleep paralysis and the now infamous: automatic behavior. Automatic behaviors are cataloged as a parasomnia. We all have them and we have all experienced them at one time or another. Examples include: Driving home and not even realizing how you got there, being thoroughly exhausted and putting things away then finding them in the strangest places without any idea how they got there. This type of behavior is common to extreme exhaustion, a condition which narcoleptics face on an hour by hour, minute by minute basis. Narcoleptics have been misdiagnosed since they have existed. Due to the strange behaviors of hallucinations and 'voices,' that come with a severe lack of REM sleep (and if you don't understand, then imagine this: the possibility of schizophrenia being misdiagnosed as narcolepsy and treated with frontal lobotomies through the middle to late 1800's is at least 75%!!! That's a lot of innocent, dead people); the depression and anxiety from missed sleep; the social anxiety from seizure conditions; the esteem issues from rapid weight changes and so on have caused narcoleptics to work as hard as they can over the years to stay under the radar and avoid prosecution from doctors and even their own families.
 
It is common for people to mistake narcolepsy as a variety of other symptoms: drug use, alcohol abuse, manic behaviors and more. And, more often than not, narcoleptics go through the gamut of testing for every other disorder in the book until a doctor finally recognizes the totality of behaviors and refers them to a sleep specialist. The truth is: narcolepsy cannot be faked. It is easily tested and diagnosed, but it is still rare enough, that it is not - or in the past - has not been the first symptom on doctors' lists. But, in the past several years, narcolepsy and other sleep disorders (such as sleep walking), have not only hit the radar, but have appeared in news articles almost on a monthly basis. The truth is, what is really appearing in these news articles are the 'parasomnias' related to sleep disorders such as sleepsex, sleepmurder, and most recently, sleep emailing.
 
The fact is: any behavior that can be conducted awake, can be conducted asleep - and it is NOT limited to autonomous behaviors (redundant, simple behaviors such as setting down keys or brushing of one's teeth). Sadly, these behaviors are also not always seen as autonomous because they are complex in nature. An individual in Canada by the name of Lamb, murdered his mother and attempted to murder his father and woke up some time later covered in blood and immediately turned himself in with no knowledge of what he had done. This is NOT unusual. In fact, a search through case files, state by state, will reveal that thousands of individuals, nation-wide, have gone to the police after finding themselves in a comprimising situation, been caught at the scene of the crime with no recollection of what they had done or were later caught because they tried to clear the evidence having woken up to the frightening scene of murder, unaware of how or why they were there. This has gone on since the day the United States of America was conceived - AND EARLIER. The problem: only in the last ten years have 'sleep disorder' centers been springing up. And, only in the last 5 years have they begun to appear like wildfire. Almost every major hospital and University in America now has a sleep-disorders center, or a neurological specialist who focuses on sleep disorders. Picture 20 years ago - not a single sleep disorders center of any reknown or knowledge or fame and over 85% of all neurologists untrained and unknowledgeable in sleep disorders.
 
In fact, in the 60's, individuals with sleep disorders were sent to institutions for the insane where they were examined, poked and prodded and eventually diagnosed with the proper disorder after years of analysis. Did these individuals get out? Go look up the "real" records and find out that most, did not. The epidemic of mistreatment of sleep disorders is even more widespread than the mentally/physically handicapped or the elderly. Fortunately, only 40 years later, teenagers and children who develop this disorder are no longer berated and abused by their parents (a common act that still occurs, but not as severe as it used to), but are taken to doctors and properly diagnosed. Adults still suffer from losing jobs and the ADA has made NO leway in requiring workplace accommodations for any sleep disorder, including narcolepsy. Narcoleptics can include doctors, lawyers, police, judges (yes - this has come up - a LOT - in the last ten years), and other people who are trying to be functional, tax-paying members of society. However, they still find themselves in divorce, losing their families, their jobs, their dignities and their lives. But - it gets worse.
 
The changes in technology have certainly challenged the court systems over the last ten years and the laws are so far behind that the level of ignorance in court rooms and amongst judges, police, jurors, prosecutors and the rest of society is so large, that more crime occurs than not and there are an estimated 25% of all people in prison for computer related crimes who are innocent. Unfortunately, unlike DNA that has been exonerated prisoners at an astonishing rate, computers don't always come with such clear and concise footprints. Contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision that "It is better to let 10 guilty men go free than wronly imprison 1 innocent person," our paranoid society has done just the opposite, and without anything more than 'circumstantial' evidence, people are going to prison for life under the protest of their innocence, or pleading not guilty and taking plea bargains, losing their families, friends and livelihoods. But, even more challenging for the courts is the ever-evolving fields of psychology and neurology.
 
Neither of these are an exact science, and on a fluctuating basis either condemn people or set them free. There is no clear precedent, and what has been discovered today might be rediagnosed and rediscovered 20 years from now. Unfortunately, people with sleep disorders don't have 20 years from now. They are facing courtrooms on an alarmingly increasing basis. From sleep-rape to sleep-murder, epileptics, sleepwalkers, and others with parasomnias are finding themselves under scrutiny for 'mens rea': criminal intent. Did they intend to do the crime? Some might justify that an unconscious act is an obviously intentional one. Some might say that there is no such thing. But, as I stated earlier, these disorders are clearly identifiable, and don't think that anyone can just 'fake' their way through it. In fact - if someone tries, good luck. They can be connected to machines that will discover the truth. So, how do you tell if someone is acting intentionally because they are unconscious and it's their 'unconscious,' desire? Well, given that blanket determination and Freud's theory regarding the oedipal complex - we're ALL in danger! Eventually, we'll kill our fathers, and try to rape our mothers. But, how many of you who can remember your dreams can say that you've NEVER had a nightmare?
 
What if you think someone's trying to kill you and in defense, you automatically fight back? Have you never had a dream based on sex or violence ever? If not - I would dare say that either 1) You're not human, or 2) You're lying, or 3) You have no memory of it - and would be in even MORE danger than those who can at least recall some of their dreams. Now we come to emailing. This phenomenon is not new either (although it was recently and incorrectly reported by ABC that it is). Michelle Morandin, in March 2005, performed an analysis on Narcolepsy and automatic behavior and discovered to what extremely complicated extent automatic behaviors can occur. In fact, in the 60's, there is evidence of narcoleptics writing detailed letters and performing detailed tasks that they have no recollection of. Some of these were considered "incomplete," because they were not done without some level of intereference from being 'asleep,' while many, many others were considered 'complete,' because they were tasks performed very well and without any indication of the individual being asleep. This includes conversations, writing letters, walking around, driving, working and much, much more. But, on almost every occassion, something would be done or said, that while done functionally, was unusual for that person's personality.
 
For example, they may have made outrageously crude and cruel comments, argued or acted loving and sexual. At work, they may have mixed up formulas or patterns and functionally completed the 'wrong' task. They may have driven perfectly fine getting home, but at unsual speeds or with unsual driving patterns. How does this bode for the sleep disorders folks legally? Not well at all. A review of the NHTSA manual for visual recognition of driving under the influence, every last indicator is identical to an individual who has fallen asleep. While still dangerous, it is currently not a crime - but it will be treated as one. Shoplifting, even while on camera being asleep - is still illegal (even if the individual has the money and offers to pay or return an item for which they had no need, such as dog food for someone who owns no animals!!). But, what about sleep emailing or surfing the internet? Now the real trouble starts - two areas of law, technology and psychology, that are so severely incapable of keeping up with the curve, that the laws being relied upon for set precendences are completely inapplicable.
 
What if I send an email to someone claiming I want to kill them or I want to die? If I did it while asleep - I could have been dreaming. I could have had the television on at the same time and was being severely influenced by these matters. Worse, I would have no recollection of doing it, no reason to go look it up to see if I sent it (because I don't remember it), and no reason to believe that I would do that - challenging my own sanity!! But, in today's day and age, cyberhacking, viruses, pop-ups of an illicit nature and other such elements have become so commonplace, that it is an accepted given and the antivirus, antiphishing, anti-this and that industries have soared like eagles. What about this? How would someone who was surfing the internet, and passed out, but continued on surfing unconsciously, would they be able to handle pop-ups or redirects? Would they know where they're surfing or what they were doing? Would they know what they were doing during an ATM transaction or when working on a cash register?
 
One might argue that individuals with parasomnias shouldn't drive - but should anyone who is tired, drive? Should we take away everyone's license or install a device in every car to determine if someone is tired? Don't we have ENOUGH laws already? If the individuals can be on controlled medication, during the daytime, then they should have the same rights as everyone else. However, if anyone is disabled, such as a sleepwalkers, they make provisions to help them from walking at night. The same provisions could be made for others suffering from parasomnias as soon as the government is willing to recognize their disorder and begin to offer assistance. In the meantime -
 
If someone is impoverished and starving, and they steal bread: then they knowingly steal - there is a moralistic question, but the law is clear.
If someone is asleep and disabled with parasomnias out of their control, and they commit a crime: then they did NOT knowingly do anything wrong and may have no recollection of it. There is no question of innocence, only of whether or not they need added help to keep from doing the same act or ADA allowances to assist in their lives, but the law is NOT clear.
 
-Would you put someone who is a sleepwalker in prison for trying to commit suicide because they walked out a second story window? The law says you have to. Some might think it's hard to believe that would happen because they don't understand the disorder - but because the scientists have finally determined, after thousands of years of this disorder existing, that it 'exists,' the courts accept the lack of mens rea argument. Would you put a mentally handicapped person in prison because they saw a candybar they wanted and took it, not understanding that it was wrong? What about a child? We don't punish the disabled. America was founded by misfits of society seeking freedom from persecution because they believed and acted differently than society expected of its usual groups. How is this different for the disabled?
 
The laws, however, are slow to recognize parasomnias and even slower to keep up with technology. Nobody wants to create a loophole for criminals - period. But, ask yourself this: if you were to wake up one day with a sleep disorder such as narcolepsy (and yes - it really does happen that way - you wake up one day with it), and a criminal were to see you had it and knew that the laws were not yet up to speed on the topic, wouldn't we be creating a loophole by allowing them to falsely incriminate the innocent? It happens EVERY day! Mentally handicapped, chidlren, elderly, epileptics and so on are accused of things they did not do, and it allows criminals to get away with crimes. It makes us better understand why the Supreme Court wanted to keep innocent people out of prison: because if we don't, the guilty ones are left wandering free and are encouraged to continue falsely incriminating the innocent.
 
If you've read this whole article, and you think it's time that the law, "wakes up," then write to your Senators and your Congressmen - tell them that this cannot continue. Sorry that the courts are overwhelmed - but maybe if they quit making up new laws, without voter input, on a daily basis, to control every facet of our lives, the courts won't be overwhelmed. Quit wasting tax payer money for cops to perform road-side speed traps that cost us $60,000 per year and make only 1 tenth of that back in fines, and then if jail occurs, cost us even more - and work on 'REAL' crimes. Quit allowing the prosecutors of this fine country prosecute cases based SOLELY on circumstantial evidence? To do so - REALLY undermines the principals of justice. Require them to NOT force blanket laws with little applicability or pass judgments on presumptions of guilt versus facts of guilt, especially when dealing with disabled people such as sleepwalkers, narcoleptics and others, until they can get caught up and be rewritten, under the scientifically provable facts associated with sleep disorders (that can't be faked), to develop programs so that we don't falsely incriminate people.
 
This ISN'T the 1800's. We do NOT lobotomize people anymore!! At least - we're not supposed to. We are supposed to be a civilized society that seeks to help those who suffer from disorders and disabilities. A society that seeks to keep them productive members of our society and make use of their skills so that we can all work together. The scales of justice cannot be weighed down with gold bars on the prosecution's side merely because the government has the money to prosecute but the innocent are disabled and can barely afford their medication!!
 
Justice is blind - but it shouldn't be ignorant. It's time to wake up. And, only - with YOUR written input, your courage and your compassion, will this country change - yes - 1 person at a time - it has to start somewhere. I've started here - what will you do next?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »