About Me

Name: CyberMom
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! pt. 1

[This is a 4-part article covering the recent news coverage on the Health Care reform package and is not comprehensive on ALL the issues. If you read this through to the end, you will see that I list a course of action to take to help put a stop to this bill, and explain throughout, why it should be stopped and under what misleading pretenses the Left is attempting to push this through!] 

Yes, President Obama will be bringing forth his pitch for health care reform to the people once again, this time, in a State suffering from tremendously high levels of uninsured citizens. And, yes, YOU, the people, will once again be given an opportunity to hear the, "real," issues and put forth your voices! Once again, we the people, of this Democracy known as the United States of America, shall be empowered once more!
 
Oh wait... wrong story. I forgot, we get NO say in this - at all. It's now: "Obama vs. Congress vs. the People," and he wants to pressure leaders in Congress to go along with his plan (at least the 60 or so who are still standing up to him), or otherwise, appear as the, "bad guys," in front of the people and not get voted in next year (while he retains his office for another 3 years). Sorry - my bad - I apologize in advance. I, 'sort of,' forgot that it's not about the people or what we want, but using scare tactics and lies to force the people into drastic action - like sheep - for the politicians. Sort of reminiscent of those by-gone days, where the ancient Greek Gods would war with one another, and the people were just their pawns and in their way. Funny, I thought America was a country of people, not politicians - I guess that's just not the case - but I digress.
 
The reform will now cut the budget from the apparently, current cost of $2.4 trillion down to a mere, $900 billion, will take away the impositions against businesses to force-fund the program and relieve those with insurance from added tax debts. Additionally, it will increase the number of people covered to 95%, eliminating things like, 'pre-existing,' conditions, and co-pays for 'basic,' services; eliminate 'government run health care and create co-ops for the people to decide, while easing the tax burdens on the wealthy.

Yeah - hah - hahahahaha - no... wait for it.... wait.... yep - hahahahahaha! Okay - let's weed through this, shall we? Bloomberg AP News reports: Health care as it is now is getting really, REALLY expensive. If the government doesn't curb it - it's going to bankrupt the people!! But, some don't agree - they think the health care reform posed by Obama will cause a greater deficit and hurt the people more. Okay... sounds reasonable - two sides to the argument, right? The Hill reports: that the currently proposed reform to Obama's plan, being headed up by Senator Baucus(D), will reduce the costs to $900 billion, maintain 95% coverage (except to 'undocumented,' illegal aliens... vs. the 'documented,' illegal aliens who WILL be covered), and reduce the national deficit over a 10-year period. Senator Konrad (D) stated that he knows of 12 million people that are already positioned to sign up for co-op run plans! And, a committee will be established to find additional ways to cap medicare pay-outs and spending, in addition to the billions in cuts proposed, to help reduce the national deficit! Medical News Today reported that: the cut in spending on 'undocumented,' immigrants, makes up about 98% of the 50 million who would not be covered by this health care reform (47 mil). The [May] article in Medical News Today also quoted Sen. Baucus as saying that he is opting for business paid health exchange and a government run health care option. Senator John Kerry (D) stated that taxing the rich is senseless as it raises too little money, but you can't tax the working class because that would interefere in business success.

This blogroll on the ABC News website discussed the amazing fact that Congress is now seeking public congrats for having actually read Obama's health reform bill. My Central Oregon.com reports that: dependent coverage will be extended to age 26, a removal for 'denial,' of pre existing conditions for insurance, policies with premiums paid in full must be renewed, and gender biases would be stopped. Lawmakers will knock an additional $35 million out of medicare to help lessen the overall expense of this reform, and, the uninsured won't begin to see changes until 2013, with full coverage to those uninsured not being realized until 2018.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! pt. 2

  Now - with ALL that said - with all those issues laid out before you - the people who get to decide (no.. not vote.. don't be silly, this is America! We don't vote here! We just push Congress and threaten them with their jobs and not voting for them because we're a Democracy, duhh!!), let's break this down to REALITY:

1. The current cost of $2.4 trillion will be lessened to $900 billion. FACT: If you READ the article, you might notice that it is the current population of America, WITH health insurance, paying that $2.4 trillion - not Uncle Sam. Their health care reform is supposed to somehow lessen YOUR direct costs, while funny enough - the media/White House keeps reporting that we should be concerned about this health care reform because of the 'costs,' that will have to be charged in taxes. So.. wait? Are they lowering your $2.4 trillion by paying for the $2,399,100,000,000 ($2.39 trillion) in tax dollars? How does that 'offset,' your costs? Are they going to 'force,' health insurance companies into charging less? I suppose that's where their 'incentives,' options come in - but those incentives options STILL include our taxes - so, somehow, I think we've got the White House intentionally mixing apples with oranges and confuse the issues to make YOU think like they're lowering the overall tax deficit - when that's NOT true. So, were two sides of the story reported on? Those who think this will increase the deficit and those who don't? Yep - but the bridge between the two realities of a $2.4 trillion dollar, consumer-paid, private insurance bill and a $900 billion dollar government funding plan - was not gapped. In fact, when you listen to Obama talk, he refers to the previous administration (Republican), as being responsible for your $2.4 trillion dollar price tag on insurance and how he, as a (Democrat), will curb that. Sad as it is - he's not only trying to confuse the two issues, the President, and several others in Washington, are using the confusion as a battle-ground!!??

2. A Co-Op insurance option. A co-op was suggested at a government-paid (ahem.. tax payer paid) price-tag $6 billion. THAT would be on of those 'gaps,' that needs crossing. Have you ever HAD a co-op or been in a co-op, like a CC&R or power company? Is there any great 'savings,' there? I'm not talking the 'amount,' of the bill - I'm talking about the savings - because it doesn't exist. So, there's your $2.4 trillion, with an additional tax deficit of $6 billion on top of it already!

3. Eliminating 'pre existing conditions,' as ground for denial. Well, if you'll read about pre existing conditions and insurance as they currently stand, you'll see the 'real,' problem isn't denial - it's the added costs to those with this issue. And, in fact, when you read through the articles in the last post, you'll see that little, 'one-liner,' note in there. This bill does NOT deal with the current problem of added costs for pre existing conditions. In fact, this is a worthless addition to the bill designed to be propoganda intended to 'distract,' you.

4. No co-pays for basic services. Yes, that's right. For mammograms, check-ups, and other, preventative care visits, you'll pay no co-pay. Of course, that's REALLY going to help curb that increasing insurance premium, right? After all - no copays means the insurance company picks up the ENTIRE tab, right? HAHAHAHA - sure - that'll lessen your premiums.

5. Covering 95% of the uninsured. Yes, I know I detailed this in part already, but I'll repeat it here because... it's funny! Senator Baucus, seemingly the new spokesperson for this 'sub-reform-reform,' has stated that it's Washington's belief that they can cover up to 95% of the people who are currently uninusured! But, they're still working on a way to handle the undocumented illegal immigrants, because they won't be covered. So - 50 million by this new reform (seemingly, the 5% who won't be covered by the reform), consists of: 47 million undocumented, illegal immigrants. Forgive me if my math is wrong, but that means that 94% of the people who won't be covered by this health care extension include the 'undocumented,' illegal immigrants who will already NOT be covered by this health care plan, while the 6% may... or may not... include the 'documented,' illegal immigrants. Maybe I'm just stretching here.. but the current 95% coverage WILL cover the documented, illegal immigrants... who are, "illegal," and the 6% not covered will be American Citizens, that as Sen. Baucus states: are amongst those you can "always find," who won't qualify under this new plan. Aren't we back to apples and oranges and misleading information again? Isn't this 95% coverage for uninsured folks, talking about only leaving out, for the most part, undocumented, illegal immigrants? How much of a 'stretch,' is that - in reality?

Hmm... somehow, this still seems a bit shady. I think there's something more to this story, don't you?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! pt. 3

(continuing on from the last post)

6. Senator Kerry (D), has emphasized his support of not taxing the wealthy, because that would just not cover the bill. Wait? didn't we just go over the 'bill,' and the $2.4 trillion consumer paid vs. the $900 billion government paid? Sorry.. my head's spinning. Listening to the left spin their garbage out of Congress and into the streets can do that sometimes. Inversely, Sen. Kerry wants us to be careful about lowering the tax bracket of who pays for this bill too far, becasue we could interefere with employer businesses if the lower-class have to start paying. That is to say, he supports taxing the businesses, but if we tax the people and the businesses who can no longer afford to keep people on staff because of their dramatic increases in taxes per person, we'd be double taxing and inevitably causing an increase in unemployment. Oops.. I meant.. he 'inferred,' that - he didn't say it. My bad. Of course - he and Senator Konrad plan on supporting co-ops because white house studies show 12 million people currently in support of it. What 12 million people? What sector? It seems to me that if we shouldn't "lower," that tax bracket too far - that the 'lower,' tax bracket will NOT be the ones supporting the co-ops. (As a side note - let's also not forget many of these Senators are in that wealthy tax bracket who will pay out... AND... they are business owners - which it sounds like Sen. Kerry has covered his backside on both issues!).

7. Insurance companies who have been paid must provide insurance! Well, THIS was an awesome addition to the bill, don't you think? After all, this hits right to the heart of the issue, doesn't it? Okay, sarcasm aside - yes - THIS is a DISTRACTION, that out of 4,000 pages, was NOT newsworthy, but it's what the Congress and White House offered the people. Sure - they've read the bill. Was it to show the American people that they care and necessary to help 'sell,' the bill? No, and yes. It wasn't to show they cared, it was to find out what 'highlights,' they could offer the media and the public to 'appease,' us, while not discussing the 'other,' major issues.

8. Uninsured will begin receiving coverage in 2013! Yes, AFTER the next election. What a WONDERFUL way to wrap people up into voting for... well.. not those 'horrifying,' Republicans that opposed this bill! After all - you're all about to receive benefits thanks to Obama and the Democratic party! Do you really, REALLY, want to vote Republican and give ALL that up? Sure... and not everyone gets benefits until 2018. What a way to REALLY play this issue out. Didn't see it, yet? Let me 'splain: This $900 billion to be spent, will be "drug," out - including medicare payouts and the currently existing medicare program, to not really 'work,' until mid 2015. That means, that it will only cost about $450 billion by then (yes - assuming those numbers were accurate - which they aren't). That way, come election time, it looks like they've been saving the budget because the deficit's not as high, and JUST LIKE THE STIMULUS, they've "issued," the monies - but NOT spent the monies - and so they haven't had to "dramatically," raise taxes. Instead, the increase will be slow and steady over time where it won't "really," be felt for 5 or 6 more years and you won't "really," feel that pinch until then. But, make no mistake: If you buy something for $1000.00 - you OWE a $1000.00. AND - if you SPAN out your amortization on the "loan," you took out to buy that item, your interest will be HIGHER! So - that $1000, rather than costing $1400 in a 3 or 4 year payoff, will cost $2000 in the 6 year payoff, but by the third/fourth year, you will have only "seen," a $1,000 go out the door - and it will look GREAT on paper! Anyone who's EVER leased ANYTHING - will know about this - whether your lease was great or a pain. It's basic math, it's deceptive - it's LYING! YOU'RE going to PAY MORE - so THEY can look LESS like bad guys they really are! I'll remind you of this in 2012, if I'm still around - when this comes true.

9. Medicare cuts and caps will help curb the $2.4 trillion to $900 billion. I've saved this "special," issue for the end for a very, good reason: Medicare cuts of $35 million dollars, 'squeezing,' the system "after" they've cut billions out of it that well.. you know.. pay no attention to the man behind the curtain... ANYWAY - the committee (that will cost us), to arrange these cuts, will save us $2.39 trillion dollars! YAY!! Um... wait.. wasn't that $2.4 trillion what people currently, privately pay for insurance and has nothing to do with government spending? How will $35 million save $2.39 trillion? How will $35 million in addition to hundreds of billions, save $2.39 trillion? HOW WILL CUTTING Medicare INCREASE fair insurance to everyone?

Hold on - something's not right? (see why I saved this one?) Holy Medicare Premiums Batman - the math isn't working??!! Neither is the logic.. boy wonder!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Reform - YOU Decide! finale

Guess what? If you've been reading this little series on the current news media and reports from Washington on Health Care, you "might," be hanging onto your head.. or at least your seat right now, trying to understand what just happened to you.
 
Congress 'READ,' the Bill! They put their hard time and effort into it just for you! They did it so that they could either increase their ability to 'sell,' you on it, or raise concerns to Legislature that will really, really hit home and make sure this is the right bill for us.
 
Yeah... and I'm actually a good writer. HAHAHAHAHA.
 
Let's be real:
In May of 2009, Senator Baucus, the now self-proclaimed spokesperson for this bill and the leader of the sub-reform reform bill intended to sway the rest of Congress, said: We need businesses to bear this burden! We need an insurance health exchange! We need a government-run health care option!
 
Today, Senator Baucus - the same one - who is supposedly "reforming," the health care bill, is saying: we shouldn't burden businesses. What health exchange? Let's do a co-op! And, don't be silly, a government run health care option would be pointless. Don't worry, I'll make sure that 95% of the people without insurance get it!
 
Thank goodness. Thank goodness that a man who has consistency, integrity, honesty and high-moral values is in charge of our reform. Thank goodness Obama's going to a state to speak to people suffering without health insurance to pass his bill. And, thank goodness everyone in Congress took the time to read that 4,000 page bill, because they were told to vote before their "1-month, vacation," which has now been postponed until September - in which they'll do NOTHING during August.
 
Yechth! Sorry - have to wash out my mouth for spitting out all that garbage! Folks, I've made brief references to the health care bill, explaining the current system needs reformed and the logistics behind that. However, the Democrats (and again, I hate taking "sides," but this IS what THEY are doing under President Obama), are now saying: Look - see how much more expensive this is getting by waiting? And, they're now going to wait another month. Why? So they can JACK UP that $900 billion price tag. They're saying that if we don't act "fast," and vote ASAP - that $2.4 trillion current expense will skyrocket! And, guess what - if the reform bill's NOT passed by Congress - Obama, in his special, "private," meetings with AARP, will make sure it HAPPENS! The pressure's on. It's Obama's signature move. It's what he does. He goes to the people so YOU feel empowered, getting you to pressure Congress - to institute a bill which will devastate us - proving that we were NEVER empowered in the first place!
 
Squeezing medicare costs? Capping medicare payouts? Sure - that'll work. That'll put a hefty burden on medicare patients. And, what about this $335 - $445 billion dollar cut in medicare that's supposed to "lessen," the $2.4 trillion to $900 billion? Oops.. sorry - I'm mixing the same apples and oranges Congress did. Don't want to play that: MISLEAD YOU AND LIE TO YOU game they're playing. Instead, let's address the fact that: they are now talking about preserving your health care rights. So - your $2.4 trillion that is increasing - will continue to increase! Your insurance premiums WILL rise. Why? Well - we're 'capping,' the insurance companies, aren't we? We're controlling 'gender,' biases (which is unlawful in the first place), aren't we? Sure we are - now the gender that insurance thinks is at higher risk can be insured - but it will cost you more. The 26 year old kid's going to cost you more. The lack of co-pays is going to cost you more. The addition of pre-existing/high risk patients will cost you more. The lack of lifetime caps will cost you more. It's impossible NOT to! These are the SAME, EMPTY promises Obama made during his campaign!
 
I'm going to give you more, give you this, give you that, cut spending in half, and everything's going to be peachy-keen! Are we THAT stupid? *sigh - don't answer... - we know the answer* You can't CAP insurance companies, lessen their rates, and expect them to provide MORE? In truth - what we should be REALLY inflamed about, is that Congress has now claimed to read this bill, and yet, they haven't provided us with answers to explain a drop from $2.4 trillion to $900 billion (yes, apples and oranges - but since they've said it - explain how this 'drop,' in the deficit will occur?). And, uninsured people who get sick or need medicine NOW - CAN'T wait until 2013 when THEY'RE going to be covered.
 
Hold on - when "they're," going to be covered? I thought Senator Baucus said: No, to government run health care and that private insurance will remain as is with you getting to pay your own bills as it is now? What's this $900 billion for, then? It's not ALL for the 2013 - 2018, 5-year period of covering the uninsured. Is he, lying? Perhaps even, misleading us? Are we getting 6 pages out of the 4,000? YES! The answer to ALL those questions is: YES.
 
What to do now? "Now's the time for all good men (and women), to come to the aide of their country!" (Charles E. Weller).
 
Yes - head to the typewriter, the pen and paper - the computer if you must - but get going! Don't just tell Congress - "No - or I'll vote you out of office," tell them: "NO - AND IF YOU DON'T STOP LYING I'M GOING TO VOTE YOU OUT OF OFFICE AND CONTACT THE SUPREME COURT AND ASK WHAT I NEED TO DO TO IMPEACH YOU FOR LYING TO ME."
 
Okay - a little, "brash," perhaps, but I'll let you refine it however you feel is necessary. Now is the time for action. Now is the time for all of us to stand. You cannot implement government mandated health care controls and restrictions without also making it a 'government,' run, health care system. You cannot determine (in advance), the appropriate and only acceptable treatments for medical problems that doctors may implement or choose from, without making it a government-run medical program. However they're trying to 're-label,' what they're doing, Senator Baucus, in his hopefulness that we're all too stupid to think for ourselves, has done us a favor. You see, he raised the issues in 100% support of Obama, waited for the public outcry and what seemed to be our dilemma, then strategically helped partake in a very well organized plan to 'rework,' the reform to appear as something different while still supporting Obama 100%. He played the propaganda game to the hilt - and if alone - I'd liken him to the skills of Winston Churchill. However, if you don't see it yet, I'll just lightly present this to you: if he's not alone and only a patsy in the bigger scheme of what's going on: the entire Democratic party has run one of history's greatest campaigns since World War II. But, I'll let you decipher that for yourselves. Thanks - and God Bless you all!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Truth About Health Care

   Well folks, you can thank Glenn Beck for failing the American public as of this morning, July 23, 2009. In fact, I would go so far as to say he embarrassed the whole of the Republican party this morning. In life, there are some things you can joke about that are funny - there are some assumptions you can make that are generically okay - and setting political correctness aside; there are some empty arguments you can blindly toss out there and it's still okay. But, there are some you can't, and health care IS one that you can't attack empty handed. Barrack Obama told a story about a woman who paid into her health insurance but they refused to pay for her cancer treatments, and a story about a person who lost their job and ended up with an exorbitant debt from a life-saving surgery. All that Beck could focus on, was that we "don't know the cancer woman's whole story," and it's probably her fault, and that the guy who lost his job was too "stupid" (yes, word that Beck used ver batim), to get Cobra. He spent plenty of time making fun of both of them simply because Barrack Obama, rather than dragging out a speech with all the details, gave those two highlighted examples of problems with our health care system. They should have never been the brunt of his jokes because: 1: Insurance companies have had an infamy for refusing services they are supposed to provide and 2: because we don't know that the guy with the debt DIDN'T have Cobra. Ignorance only begets ignorance.
 
The problem? People like Glenn Beck with insurance, who are not disabled and haven't hurt, don't know. Glenn will profess that unless you've been an alcoholic and gone through recovery you can't possibly understand things about that system that he does; and he's right. The same goes for health care. But, those of you listening to his show may be in the same position he is, and rather than weeding through ignorance and getting the truth - you had more ignorance blasted in your face. It is now REALLY upsetting me that EVERY FORM OF MEDIA coverage has seem to "Magically," *poof*, forgotten the stories we've had about the health care system since Obama suggested socialized medicine. Sure, there are plenty of stories of people leaving socialized medicine countries and coming to America so they can get the treatment they need, "in time." How do they get their treatment, by paying for it? NO. They come here, broke, and get their treatment through the: SOCIALIZED portion of health care system as it is now??!! Oops - forgot to mention that when attacking socialized medicine, huh? Did we forget that there are LITERALLY thousands of people, EVERY YEAR, leaving THIS COUNTRY to go to Europe, Canada and OTHER countries to get alternative treatments because our health care system won't provide them? Oops - forgot to mention that little caveat when discussing the "evil," socialized medicine, huh?
 
Have we so quickly forgotten the woman in southern california desperately trying to cross the border to Mexico so that she can get an alternate form of cancer treatment for her 5 year old little boy so that he didn't have to be radiated for cancer because he BEGGED her to save him - but the LAW - the LEGAL SYSTEM - the JUSTICE OF AMERICA - sent the authorities after her, blockading roads, and FORCED her to relinquish her child to the medical community to radiate the CR@P out of him? Did you forget that? Did you forget how the GOVERNMENT ALREADY forced people into treatments they didn't want through fearmongering and absolution of power? Oops... sorry... yeah.. forgot there are just a few, bugs, but only a few, right - isolated stories, right? Well, maybe we've ALL forgotten the young lady in Oregon, who was only in her 20's, that needed a LIFE SAVING SURGERY, but her INSURANCE COMPANY wouldn't authorize it until her family initiated a LAWSUIT, and then, when the insurance company conceeded and gave in to actually having to "spend," money to save someone's life - it was TOO LATE AND SHE %^##$%^#@ DIED! Yeah - um - isn't that the "evil," of "socialized," medicine that the Republicans such as Glenn Beck are professing against? You know, the ones where the government gets to decide what treatments you have or makes you stand in lines until you die? WE are NOT a socialized medicine country and yet we have ALL of the same problems as SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
 
If Socialized medicine was SO BAD, in countries where you get to ELECT your leaders (and America's not the only one people), they STILL don't leave that system. Why not? If it's SO BROKEN, why are we the ONLY country not to use it? from Wikipedia on Socialized Medicine:
 
"Most industrialized countries, and many developing countries, operate some form of publicly-funded health care with universal coverage as the goal. According to the Institute of Medicine and others, the United States is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not provide universal health care."
 
[Note - please be aware that the above does NOT ALSO consider that the issues I raise in this article about the welfare system, and the medical coverage in the Military - considered to be some of the best available - fall within the LIMITED spectrum definition of Socialized Medicine in respect to the way that the radio talk show hosts use the term]
 
Look - I'm not advocating for it - not at all. What I don't like is when people like Glenn Beck go on the radio and talk about how "stupid," some kid was for not getting Cobra, stating that it's a government mandate that businesses offer to you and HE IS WRONG. He obviously hasn't done his homework, which he proclaims so "ADAMANTLY," that he does. You CAN be refused Cobra - including for reasons of termination vs. self-terminition. You CAN be refused Cobra if you're disabled and have a pre-existing condition. Okay - so - I'm gonna let you ALL in on a little secret -
 
I'm disabled. I don't have health insurance. Why? Don't I qualify? Sure I do! Even with a pre-existing condition and HUGE bills, I would qualify. You see, for $215 per month, I could pay for a program that requires only a $15 copay per doctor's visit and a 50% copay on my meds. So, every month, my $150 in prescriptions (that's the minimum - it's much larger but I won't tell you how much), would only cost me $75!! Every three months, seeing my doc would only cost me $15, not the usual $180! Yes, $180 for a 15 minute visit to renew my prescription. I have an extremely RARE disorder that does require a specialist I'm afraid. NO - I AM NOT ON WELFARE or State paid assistance. I pay out of pocket. But, let's do the math: I can pay $210 per month (averaging out meds and doc visits), to get EVERYTHING I NEED without health insurance, knowing that if I'm injured, I'm screwed, OR I can pay $295 per month (same avg), knowing that if I'm injured, because of my disability, I would only be covered up to 50%. Let's see, spend an additional $85 per month for that "safety net," that covers 50% of my needs, OR, try to use that $85 to help cover the $400 per month I'm going in the hole because of the entirety of my health needs? Hmm... tough choice... it REALLY, REALLY is. But, I can't afford the middle man ON TOP of the middle man. You see... my doc doesn't really get $180 for the visit - he gets probably half of that. Half of the $90 left over is taken by the clinic while the other half goes to pay into the CURRENTLY EXISTING socialized medicine program we have, for those without insurance who are covered by the government. I don't take advantage of the system even though I qualify, I don't ask for a hand out and am trying hard, on my own, disabled, to make it, and yet I currently have to pay for those who are without health insurance.
 
Is our current health care system broke? You bet it is. Maybe you forgot about the docs who complained with the health care system reforms in the 90's when the health insurance providers switched to a "get 'em in and get 'em out" method (of which HealthNet became infamous for), and the docs would only make money for shorter visits, less bedside manners and LESS tests. It's been in place for so long - because the GOVERNMENT supported it, that maybe you forgot how it changed bedside manners. When people like Glenn Beck argue against "socializing," services because it infringes on their money - they ONLY support Obama's position. He stands against GREED.
 
"Sorry - I don't want socialized medicine because I WANT MY MONEY - SCREW everyone else."
 
THAT IS NOT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S STAND on the issue. THAT IS GLENN BECK'S, and Sean Hannity's and Rush Limbaugh and they are making Republicans look greedy, selfish AND STUPID!
 
[Note to Glenn, Sean and Rush - I apologize in ADVANCE if that is NOT the message you intended - but maybe you need to STEP BACK and listen to your words - ie - Glenn - you wrote the book "Common Sense," of which I own five copies, four to still give away on top of the 3 I already have - but it should be COMMON sense to you to realize that this is EXACTLY what you are saying - IN CONTEXT - whether you mean to or not!]
 
Republicans, by the party-term and definition, are NOT greedy. We are NOT selfish - and I wish these guys would shut up - put up - or get off the air. In the infamous words of an infamous man, Lee Iacoca (sorry if I mispelled that), Lead, follow or get out of the way.
 
Argue against socialized medicine without appropriate checks and balances if you will. Argue against socialized medicine that deprives those who wish to pay for their own without penalties if you will. Those things make sense. But, do NOT argue against it because now you have to pay. A caller destroyed Sean Hannity two days ago and in my opinion ONLY (and it IS ONLY my opinion folks - please listen to his show and draw your own conclusions.. I trust you to do this), humiliated him and made him sound like a fool (which is sad, because he's not a fool), when Hannity when off on a tirade about Obama and ENTIRELY circumvented an answer because he had none. Do Republicans believe in the Defense of this country? YES. And, who pays for it? EVERYONE. IT IS SOCIALIZED. Do we believe in good education? YES. And, who pays for it - the parents of the children in school - or EVERYONE? You know the answer. Of course, both of those systems need reform, checks and balances and spending caps. But, that would be the same for medical coverage. We ALREADY have socialized health care under the "guise," known as "welfare," governed by the most idiotic and worthless agency in the WORLD - Department of Human Services. DO WE FORGET where the government buys its medication from to offer the prescriptions to the American people at cheap prices? CANADA, Europe and other foreign countries - NOT AMERICAN pharmaceuticals!!! DANGIT people - DON'T be stupid! Don't be lead like sheep. WHY does Canada get better prescription prices? SOCIALIZED MEDICINE! So - what have we learned?
 
Blindly jumping into socialized medicine - bad - the proof is in the pudding - as it were.
Blindly standing against it  - JUST as bad.
 
We ARE AMERICA. We are a nation that believes in helping the less fortunate. Ellis Island/The Statue of Liberty:
 
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!".
 
Did you forget that, too? Did you forget that we came to this Country under that VERY pretense? Did you forget the hospitality that was shown to us that we threw to the winds? Did you forget the meaning of care? I'm not a supporter of the Democrat party's philosophies. I DON'T support welfare - and if you've read my posts on here - you'd know that. I DO support a hand up. I DO support helping out. I DON'T support the government telling us where we'll give or spend our money - but I WON'T support the argument that: "It's MY money - so nah, nah," because I'm not childish, selfish or weak. If you are a Republican, and you care AT ALL about your party - you will write to Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, you will write to your State and Federal Representatives and you will say: STOP with the "rich" people bashing. Stop with the selfish "money" hoarding. That is NOT American. That is NOT what this Country is about. Consider a Health Care reform that better manages socialization issues and fair coverage for all people so that those with more money who wish to pay for more services - can do so WITHOUT added taxes or penalties - those without - can at LEAST get the basics with a program that is designed to HELP them recover financially and afford it on their own. But, we ALL share in school. We ALL share in postal and governmental and other issues - because we know these systems DO require a collaborative effort. And then, tell the officials, and those who represent our party on radio and television - SHUT UP. Quit acting like big, stupid, moronic babies without a clue. START doing what you promised - to report the truth. To act WITHOUT bickering over party sides and cover the issues that matter in an INTELLIGENT way. BE INFORMED. (Yes, the little Timmy Teetleburgermeyerwhaterverism was a funny story, well told and I enjoyed it - but ONLY insomuch as the story stood alone on the foolishness of "sob," stories, while the REALITY is that there are HORROR stories in the THOUSANDS happening daily that ARE very serious and CAN'T be ignored!)
 
Yes, straight forward socialized medicine instituted overnight would lead to massive problems, especially with under-estimated cost projections and other issues. Maybe we need more volunteers in medicine. Maybe if the government's going to spend money - it shouldn't be on socialized health care, but more free clinics for those who qualify or whose insurance companies have betrayed them. Maybe we need an FDA that is NOT corrupted and bought out by the pharmaceuticals (you can read more about this in my previous posts), but supports a WIDER variety of health services - including treating DENTAL health care with the same level of concern as regular, medical health care!!
 
Sorry that Glenn Beck bore the brunt of my complaint today, but it was too much and he just happened to be the straw that broke this old camel's back. I will say this: if the current health care reform bill passes - I pray for all of us - because the bickering and fighting will become even more moronic and baby-like and we'll see fighting and mudslinging that usually only children... or politicians... see. We will have massive problems financially and medically and we will see a decline in services just from the medical community that goes on strike and people WILL suffer. I pray for us all. But, remember this: the authorities YOU think YOU need to keep you safe from yourselves, I don't agree with, but I help pay for their services, too. The foreign military YOU think YOU need to keep us from overnight war fighting in foreign countries right now, dying and killing, I don't agree with, but I help pay for. The attorney general's the government FORCES us to pay for to PROTECT them from US, I DEFINATELY don't agree with, but we all help pay for. A reform is needed - YES. The one in play - NO. So - to that extent - the forces fighting this bill must AMASS in numbers and stand against it. But, DON'T do it blindly. DON'T do it because it will hurt your pocket book. Freedom costs - MIND, BODY, HEART, SOUL - BLOOD, SWEAT & TEARS. There is a price for freedom - and we must ALL be willing, as a collective, to pay for it. But, WE the people should be commanding what happens with it - NOT Uncle Sam - and THAT is the ONLY true argument to make.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop, Obama Time! The Changer!

Onto article two of Stop, Obama time! Where I (through assistance thanks to our wonderful system) will list some very interesting issues regarding our Presidential hopeful.... and without further ado, let us take a deep look into how Barack Obama will change this country for the better starting with health care:
 
Here is an excerpt from Barack's speech in Iowa in May of this year:
“We now face an opportunity — and an obligation — to turn the page on the failed politics of yesterday's health care debates… My plan begins by covering every American. If you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is the amount of money you will spend on premiums. That will be less. If you are one of the 45 million Americans who don't have health insurance, you will have it after this plan becomes law. No one will be turned away because of a preexisting condition or illness.”
 
And, how does the great and powerful Wizard of Oz.. er, um, Mr. Obama plan to effect these changes? Let's see:
 
Guaranteed eligibility. No American will be turned away from any insurance plan because of illness or pre-existing conditions.
FACT - most employer paid or partially funded insurance packages do not suffer from the pre-existing illness issue. It is those who must get insurance privately that suffer. And, the truth is - they are usually not turned away. The prices are jacked up and they can't afford it. So - did Obama offer ANYTHING in this little diddy about any functional reform? No, not at all.
 
Comprehensive benefits. The benefit package will be similar to that offered through Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), the plan members of Congress have. The plan will cover all essential medical services, including preventive, maternity and mental health care.
FACT: The same plan Congress has? Does that means that premiums can expect to jump about a 1000%? And, most health care programs do focus on preventative care and are almost always stipulated for care for maternity that's not already government funded. As to mental health care - the truth is - Obama will offer no more than what exists now. Those who really need it, still won't get it, because mental health care has never been cheap, and never will be.
 
Affordable premiums, co-pays and deductibles.
FACT: Ahh... the easy thing to say, isn't it? Didn't someone say this at least 20, 30 or more years ago? In an article I recently wrote about the fictitiousness of Free America, one of the topics covered was advertising driven media. In my article, I quoted another who wrote: Since 1997 when the FDA opened the door to prescription drug advertising to consumers, prescription drugs went up in price 200% to 1000% to pay for it. Non-prescription drugs went up with them. They get away with it because industry public relations claims, and we accept, that giant profits are needed to "develop new drugs."
Hmm, so - what happens to those who need life saving drugs and can't afford it? Well, they die. So - affordable premiums, and yet Obama doesn't even address what is massively contributing to driving up the prices. Wonder how that works?
 
Subsidies. Individuals and families who do not qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP but still need financial assistance will receive an income-related federal subsidy to buy into the new public plan or purchase a private health care plan.
FACT: So, essentially what we're saying here is.... welfare? Okay - makes sense. But, those who don't qualify for the other plans. So, they have to meet a certain set of qualifications - but which ones and how 'real,' will this be to the masses?
 
Simplified paperwork and reined in health costs. / Easy enrollment. The new public plan will be simple to enroll in and provide ready access to coverage.
FACT: HAHAHAHAHA - everytime the government writes something like 'simplified,' it usually means that they're cutting out everything that could have benefitted you, or that it won't happen in this lifetime. Providing easy access to coverage is a government-based standard that's been around for 30 years or so. For example, if there's a doctor within, say, 2 or 3... hundred miles of you, you can certainly reach them in one day and get back. That's easy access; if you have a car; if you can afford the gas; et. al.?
 
Portability and choice. Participants in the new public plan and the National Health Insurance Exchange will be able to move from job to job without changing or jeopardizing their health care coverage.
FACT: Those in the new, 'public plan,' or those in the National Health Insurance Exchange,' will benefit. Those who chose the private option because the others sucked or were ineffective, too bad. Those who move from a job to.. no job... also - wonder if they'll even see COBRA type insurance plans exist anymore? This is getting better, isn't it?
 
Quality and efficiency. Participating insurance companies in the new public program will be required to report data to ensure that standards for quality, health information technology and administration are being met.
FACT: This does NOT lower costs. This creates added paperwork, time and cost. I wonder if Obama actually plans things out or just writes ideas sporadically as they come to him? Let's see, which insurance company is going to write that the doctors are doing a bad job? Hmm... none come to mind. Which doctors' offices or insurance companies are not already swamped under paperwork... wow, except for the kinds of multi-billionaire level docs that good ol' Obama gets, I just can't think of any. So a change? Yes. For the good - so far, NO!

Employer Contribution:
Employers that do not offer or make a meaningful contribution to the cost of quality health coverage for their employees will be required to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of the national plan. Small businesses will be exempt from this requirement, and will receive a new Small Business Health Tax Credit that helps reduce health care costs for small businesses.
FACT: If this doesn't scare the living bajeebers out of you, you're either too rich, too dumb or flat out not reading this! First off - let's think about 'large,' employers, such as Walmart, that are so cheap they overwork their employees illegally. When this law hits - many of these stores and/or their growth, will cease. Those individuals that are poor and need walmart's services, such as its pharmacy, will pay the price. But, let's REALLY read this, shall we? Notice that employers who do NOT contribute a meaninful share, will do so out of their PAYROLL. I don't know about you folks, but somehow, it seems to me, that if I was a big business owner, I'd just stop contributing a meaninful share and then forcibly take the money out of everyone's wages to contribute my share - forcing them all to make less and PAY FOR THEIR OWN HEALTH CARE. This is NOT a mistake. This is NOT an accident. This is in direct support of big business. Holy cow - this is NOT Democratic, but Republican in its underlying nature, although severly hampered by unscrupulous principals. Glad Obama DOES state SOME of what he intends to do. That way, when people who voted for him are getting screwed, we can go back and tell them how STUPID they are and that they CAN'T complain because he told us in the beginning he was planning on causing this type of havoc.
But wait - there's more! The little guy won't suffer this indignity. Oh no, employers who just can't afford it won't be forced to have to take away from their employees earnings to force them into it. The government will do it FOR them. This small business tax credit - guess what, that's less taxes, and it has to be compensated somewhere. No - the cost of the health care doesn't decrease, but their income increases, but now they have to dish that out into health insurance anyway. And, everyone is still forced onto the same system. But wait - it gets better! When taxes have to be compensated for, others will have to pick up the slack. So the employees of big business that just got their paychecks reamed, will have to start paying.... yup - MORE TAXES!
MAN - I LOVE THIS GUY! He is the exemplification of the very strategy designed to destroy a nation, but look so good doing it, that NOBODY notices until it's too late! How awesome is that? The Liberals - the 'for the people,' people, are strategically targeting the people and the economy for a fall.

Mandatory Coverage of Children: Obama will require that all children have health care coverage. Obama will expand the number of options for young adults to get coverage, including allowing young people up to age 25 to continue coverage through their parents' plans.
FACT: All health care plans (well, okay, almost all), offer child health care coverage. The reason kids are not covered - NOBODY can afford it! Let's see - $85 per month for you.... $95 per month for your spouse, and.. oh yeah, $250 per child!!??? But now - it's required? How does that work? Do states start saving money by not making mandatory coverage for children while parents are forced to dish out this $250, lest DHS/CPS step in and take their children away for being bad parents? This is not only bad people - it's (insert HUGE explitives here) dangerous! Who is this man? Satan's hand puppet? And, allowing children up to age 25 for coverage through their parents? Well thank GOODNESS he clarified that. Cause currently, it's children who are still enrolled in school. Now little jimmy can drop out, live off of mom and dad until he's 25 and get all that health care coverage he won't need until mom and dad finally kick him out and he's unhealthy for spending 24/7 playing VIDEO GAMES! Personally - it seemed dangerous to begin with to have a president with such young children (putting family first is important in my book - but as President, you can't; yet, putting Presidency first as an obligation, hurts families and lowers any respect anyone could have for him). But, it's even more dangerous when the man has the foresight of a bat with a blindfold on that's heading toward a big rock and can't use sonar!!

Expansion Of Medicaid and SCHIP:
Obama will expand eligibility for the Medicaid and SCHIP programs and ensure that these programs continue to serve their critical safety net function.
FACT: Yes, expansion of these programs is what we need, because people who need them like the retired and disabled are not getting the services they need like affordable prescriptions or health care.. wait.. that's NOT what he said. He said: eligibility. Oh, I see, the same screwed up plan, just a lot more people to screw with it! Awesome!
 
Reducing Costs of Catastrophic Illnesses for Employers and Their Employees: Catastrophic health expenditures account for a high percentage of medical expenses for private insurers. The Obama plan would reimburse employer health plans for a portion of the catastrophic costs they incur above a threshold if they guarantee such savings are used to reduce the cost of workers' premiums.
FACT: Let's get this straight - employers who now contribute so little that they can dock the wages of their employees to cover the difference, will get reimbursed (in this case - free money to the business as they aren't the ones putting it out) for a 'catastrophic cost' that goes beyond the insured amount ONLY IF, that added amount will reduce the cost of the portion the worker's pay. Okay - let's see: I, the business owner contribute $25 per month (versus the $100 I used too! HAHAHAHA), and now deduct an added $75 from payroll - no specific employee - per person to cover that amount (while the employees currently pay their own $50 premium), but the injured employee is suing for an added $50k above and beyond the coverage limits set for them - I have two choices. I can A) Now have to pay more and further hurt my employees payroll my taking more from payroll to have higher coverage, or B) I can take the Obama Plan $10k they'll reimburse, pocket $5k, use $5k to tell the employees I'm lowering their premium by $5 per month (so now they only pay $45), but because of the lawsuit, the $40k and the bottom line, I can no longer contribute the full $25 I was before and can only contribute $15, so I'll have to deduct payroll an added $10 per person to compensate.
Man -oh - man - okay, quick poll: how many of you 'obama' supporters just woke up and realized you weren't laying in a field of poppies over the rainbow, but in the big pile of doggy doo that's building up around you? Just wondering.. show of hands.. come on now - don't be afraid...
 
Support disease management programs. Seventy five percent of total health care dollars are spent on patients with one or more chronic conditions, such as diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure. Obama will require that providers that participate in the new public plan, Medicare or the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) utilize proven disease management programs. This will improve quality of care, give doctors better information and lower costs.
FACT: Mr. Obama says... spend more money on equipment that doesn't necessarily work but is now required of you because we don't give a darn about actually trying to cure conditions like diabetes or heart disease. Now, Mr. Obama says, only those insurance companies that want to be cut costs by forcing health care into a vacuum tube that doesn't work and screw people but raise your bottom line, jump in on these new national programs. Now, provide better services for the currently, government subsidized individuals who aren't employed, are disabled or can't afford health care and don't qualify for the Obama Plan support through businesses.... oooohhh.. obama didn't say! No fixing the REAL underlying situation of lack of money for REAL services via government funding for you poor dolts!
 
Require full transparency about quality and costs. Obama will require hospitals and providers to collect and publicly report measures of health care costs and quality, including data on preventable medical errors, nurse staffing ratios, hospital-acquired infections, and disparities in care. Health plans will also be required to disclose the percentage of premiums that go to patient care as opposed to administrative costs.
FACT: Yes - do JUST as the government does. Tell us everything. Come on now, be honest. How many of you big, bad doctors are really providing poor quality to your patients? Tell us how you're inadequately providing services to those with health care. Tell us all the mistakes you personally make, not the mistakes because the system's screwed up. Also, we want to know if you deserve less staff and are screwing up the care of your patients. Also - JUST like the government, our model of absolution and truth, we EXPECT those of you in charge to show us, honestly, that you're not stacking paper to the ceiling while the clinic itself is hurting. Especially you insurance companies. After all - we KNOW how honest you are...
 
Align incentives for excellence. Both public and private insurers tend to pay providers based on the volume of services provided, rather than the quality or effectiveness of care. Providers who see patients enrolled in the new public plan, the National Health Insurance Exchange, Medicare and FEHBP will be rewarded for achieving performance thresholds on outcome measures.
FACT: YES! You no longer have to make services available to as many people as possible through the public... health... care... plan? What? Okay, um, you just have to show that you're doing a good job... at... it, and we'll give you.. more.. of... our... tax... money? HUH? I'm sorry, did I miss something? I thought Biden said that Mr. Obama was one of the 'clean,' black people, not one of the heavy pot smokers that gets high before making decisions. Oops - that was egregious- my bad. I apologize. Mr. Obama made a perfectly, um, somewhat, um, kinda... logical decision here?
 
Comparative effectiveness research. Obama will establish an independent institute to guide reviews and research on comparative effectiveness, so that Americans and their doctors will have the accurate and objective information they need to make the best decisions for their health and well-being.
FACT: Obama cares. He cares SO much, that he's going to take OUR tax money, create an institute that will mandate additional government spending on the effectiveness of research - no, don't be silly, not government money to actually help people or perform research, or look at it - so that we are told what we will and will not get. Wait! Hold on! I thought Mr. Obama was a liberal? I thought he believed in less government intervention into the private lives and practices of our people and economy? How is it - that the government will now GUIDE reviews and research? Doesn't that mean that they can pick and choose as they want, and there will be no governing authority over them? Doesn't that mean that pharmaceuticals like Phizer, with a bad rep for eating smaller suppliers and potentially (this is only heresay folks) contributing to the FDA who monitors the drugs they issue, will be able to, for instance, be on the favorable side of an opinion of some person who can now declare that only Phizers' way is right - and they can jack the meds and corner the market? Isn't this the foundation of Capitalism and an Empire? Wow, maybe I'm just reading it wrong. Guide the research on what works best and what will be done - hmmm - somehow, I can't see any other way to read that.
 
Tackle disparities in health care. Obama will tackle the root causes of health disparities by addressing differences in access to health coverage and promoting prevention and public health, both of which play a major role in addressing disparities. He will also challenge the medical system to eliminate inequities in health care through quality measurement and reporting, implementation of effective interventions such as patient navigation programs, and diversification of the health workforce.
FACT: Ahh, here we go - let's rewrite this to be more accurate: New laws governing smoking, drinking, driving, living, breathing, eating and more of our personal lives. And, no more lying for those health care providers. Now they will have to report their statistics and be honest. Cause, when they harm people, we KNOW, that they always tell the truth. Of course, now it will be a WHOLE lot easier for them to avoid some silly, government trap, because patient navigation programs will tell the patients what they will do, eat, sleep, tests they'll be subjected to, added visits with added co-pay and transportation costs and... what's this? Diversification of the health workforce? Um, maybe I'm wrong, but as far as I could tell, doctors come in all shapes, sizes, colors, sexes and more. Does this mean that the Obama plan actually has an underlying, hidden message that will force the health workforce to remove its qualified people and lower its standards? Well - at least we're being more fair in equality, even if those lowered standards mean more people die.....
WHO IS THIS NUTBALL?
 
Insurance reform. Obama will strengthen antitrust laws to prevent insurers from overcharging physicians for their malpractice insurance and will promote new models for addressing errors that improve patient safety, strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and reduce the need for malpractice suits.
FACT: Ah, so less cost for malpractice insurance. So - the insurance companies get an out and doctors will be directly screwed more often. I suppose that holds them accountable. Of course, in law-suits and the current justice system, the doc didn't REALLY have to do anything wrong. After all - everyone's honest, aren't they? But, of course, we'll promote patient safety - and in doing so - with added forms, disclaimers and effective intervention into the doctor's ability to do their job, this will most definately strengthen that doc-client relationship! No need for malpractice suits now! Wait... does that mean new stipulations on what qualifies for those suits? Maybe - this will be less cost to insurance companies, more risk for doctors, and even higher risk for patients. Cool! That's the way to win 'em over. Screw their wages, their health care and THEN - screw up the doctors. This is getting AWESOME!

Lowering Costs Through Investment in Electronic Health Information Technology Systems:
Most medical records are still stored on paper, which makes it hard to coordinate care, measure quality or reduce medical errors and which costs twice as much as electronic claims. Obama will invest $10 billion a year over the next five years to move the U.S. health care system to broad adoption of standards-based electronic health information systems, including electronic health records, and will phase in requirements for full implementation of health IT. Obama will ensure that patients' privacy is protected.
FACT: Obama loves people and is dedicated to their privacy. Therefore, he's going to jack the costs to the clinics and hospitals, dramatically re-route any IT they have in place, dampen the need to have paper records and back-ups by dramatically increasing IT costs (and thank goodness, we ALL know just how RELIABLE the computer industry really is), and keep it all under HIS watchful care by the U.S. government. Of course, to those cynics who think this is a conspiracy to get around making laws that open up medical records to courts and governments to continue the assault on the American Public by corrupted law enforcement, I can assure you: it's.. um.. well... Obama can assure you, that HE will personally protect your privacy. Nobody but you, your doctor, and the U.S. government will have control of your records. Whew! Wipe that drop of sweat from your brow. After all, a simple search at the DOJ / FBI / CERT, regarding computer security will show you that the FBI has been breaking the law, repeatedly, anyway, and getting access to records that they are getting away with or later having to apologize for and are only hacked about 1 million or so times per year. That's ONLY, 1 MILLION opportunities for the hackers to steal your records. What.. could... go.... wrong? At least you won't have to worry about law enforcement breaking the law to illegally take your medical records. Now - they'll have unlimited access. Oh yeah - and notice the $10 billion. How come we didn't get an amount anywhere else? I suppose that he didn't want us to see the measley $1 million being used for a part of the Obama plan that's to help cover the ENTIRE NATION!!??

Lowering Costs by Increasing Competition in the Insurance and Drug Markets: The insurance business today is dominated by a small group of large companies that has been gobbling up their rivals. There have been over 400 health care mergers in the last 10 years, and just two companies dominate a full third of the national market. These changes were supposed to make the industry more efficient, but instead premiums have skyrocketed by over 87 percent.
FACT: Yes, government support of big business pharmaceuticals and the FDA taking bribes (although - that's only heresay because they were donations), will no longer be an issue. Pharmaceuticals will have to give up that power to the little guys. This will FORCE them to lower their prices. On the other hand, the first time the government got involved, they screwed it all up. Now, instead of addressing the other mistakes the government made and taking responsibility for it, like allowing the public advertising of drugs that drove the market up 800%, they're going to make the pharmaceuticals accountable, just like they did with AT&T. That worked WONDERS... didn't it?
 
Barack Obama will prevent companies from abusing their monopoly power through unjustified price increases. His plan will force insurers to pay out a reasonable share of their premiums for patient care instead of keeping exorbitant amounts for profits and administration. His new National Health Exchange will help increase competition by insurers.
FACT: Yes, those insurers that join in this national program [only], will no longer be money making mongers, they will become insurers that pay out of the premiums to the doctors! This should lower premiums! This should make things better! Of course... it will be somewhat "funny," (and I use that term loosely), when the insurance companies then INCREASE the premiums to continue pocketing what they want and insurance will become unaffordable. Wow. It's one thing to make open ended decisions that have possibilities. It's an entirely different matter to back yourself into a wall that will actually HURT the masses.
 
Lower prescription drug costs. The second-fastest growing type of health expenses is prescription drugs. Pharmaceutical companies are selling the exact same drugs in Europe and Canada but charging Americans more than double the price. Obama will allow Americans to buy their medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and prices are lower outside the U.S. Obama will also repeal the ban that prevents the government from negotiating with drug companies, which could result in savings as high as $30 billion. Finally, Obama will work to increase the use of generic drugs in Medicare, Medicaid, and FEHBP and prohibit big name drug companies from keeping generics out of markets.
FACT: Didn't I say that it was the stupidity of government intervention that drove prescription prices upwards of 800%? Isn't it also true that European and Canadian markets don't suffer the same thing because of a highly-reduced, advertising-driven media vs. government/public funded media? But, of course, now WE can buy our medications from other countries. Thank goodness he invented that - just like Dan Quayle invented the internet! But, instead of the current system that lets us do that, the drugs will suddenly become inaccessible due to 'safety,' and the element of pricing. I guess, that really does hurt those folks who don't have insurance and can't afford the high-cost of drugs, because for them - they don't "fit," into the perfect, Obama Plan. However, Obama will no longer prevent the government from also taking part of the lowered prescription drug cost program - just like they did in Oregon. And oh, how it's benefitted SO many people with higher taxes, a limited range of available drugs and a whole, whopping, 10% savings over the stores! Wowweee! Thank goodness for that generic drug market now. After all, that was SO foreign to us... but I wonder... oft times we don't see a generic version of a drug because one doesn't exist. Hmm... I suppose it looked good on paper when he wrote it, but in reality - it means nothing. Guess that's not much different from everything else he's saying.. now is it?
 
That's all for now. Stay tuned for the next installment of: Stop, Obama Time! This time, we'll address Obama's miracle cure for the economy. This time, we'll show how this strong-willed liberal has full support of his party because he believes in:
 
Tax cuts for the wealthy, not those middle class losers!
 
Think he really didn't say this? HAHAHAHAHA - stay tuned believers!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »